Research Scientist, Prevention Research Center, Berkeley, California, USA.
Department of Sociology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(9):1313-1322. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2340986. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
: Research indicates that take-home naloxone (THN) is saving lives across rural Appalachia, but whether it also results in treatment for opioid use disorders (OUDs) remains unclear. This study involves a detailed qualitative analysis of interviews with 16 individuals who had overdosed on opioids 61 times to understand why a THN intervention does not routinely lead to OUD treatment. : This study builds upon a one-year (2018) qualitative study on community responses to opioid overdose fatalities in four adjacent rural counties in Western Pennsylvania. Using a semi-structured interview guide, 16 individuals who had experienced one or more overdoses were interviewed. Using NVivo, the transcribed audio-recorded interviews were coded, and a thematic analysis of the coded text was conducted. : Findings reveal that of the 29 overdoses that included a THN intervention, only eight resulted in treatment. The analysis derives five individual-level barriers to treatment: (1) opioid dependence, (2) denial/readiness, (3) opioid withdrawal fears, (4) incarceration concerns, and (5) stigma and shame. These barriers impeded treatment, even though all the interviewees knew of treatment programs, how to access them, and in some cases had undergone treatment previously. : findings indicate that there is evidence that the five barriers make entering treatment after a THN intervention challenging and seemingly insurmountable at times. Recommendations based on the findings include increasing efforts to reduce stigma of OUDs in the community, including self-stigma resulting from misusing opioids, increasing informational efforts about Good Samaritan Laws, and increasing familiarity with medication-assisted treatments for OUDS.
研究表明,阿巴拉契亚农村地区的家庭携带纳洛酮(THN)正在拯救生命,但它是否也能导致阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的治疗,目前仍不清楚。本研究通过对 16 名曾因阿片类药物过量而 61 次过量用药的个体进行详细的定性分析,旨在了解为什么 THN 干预措施通常不会导致 OUD 治疗。
本研究建立在宾夕法尼亚州西部四个相邻农村县对阿片类药物过量死亡事件的为期一年(2018 年)的定性研究基础上。使用半结构化访谈指南,对 16 名经历过一次或多次过量用药的个体进行了访谈。使用 NVivo 对转录的音频记录访谈进行编码,并对编码文本进行主题分析。
研究结果表明,在 29 次包括 THN 干预的过量用药中,只有 8 次导致治疗。分析得出了五个个体层面的治疗障碍:(1)阿片类药物依赖,(2)否认/准备,(3)阿片类药物戒断恐惧,(4)监禁担忧,(5)耻辱和羞耻。这些障碍阻碍了治疗,尽管所有受访者都知道治疗方案、如何获得治疗,并且在某些情况下之前已经接受过治疗。
研究结果表明,有证据表明,这五个障碍使得在 THN 干预后接受治疗具有挑战性,有时似乎难以克服。基于研究结果提出的建议包括加大努力减少社区中 OUD 的耻辱感,包括因滥用阿片类药物而产生的自我耻辱感,增加关于好撒玛利亚人法的信息宣传,以及增加对 OUD 药物辅助治疗的了解。