• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿巴拉契亚农村地区阿片类药物过量和纳洛酮带回家干预措施:个体层面治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的障碍的民族志证据。

Opioid Overdoses and Take-Home Naloxone Interventions: Ethnographic Evidence for Individual-Level Barriers to Treatment of Opioid Use Disorders in Rural Appalachia.

机构信息

Research Scientist, Prevention Research Center, Berkeley, California, USA.

Department of Sociology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(9):1313-1322. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2340986. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2340986
PMID:38635977
Abstract

: Research indicates that take-home naloxone (THN) is saving lives across rural Appalachia, but whether it also results in treatment for opioid use disorders (OUDs) remains unclear. This study involves a detailed qualitative analysis of interviews with 16 individuals who had overdosed on opioids 61 times to understand why a THN intervention does not routinely lead to OUD treatment. : This study builds upon a one-year (2018) qualitative study on community responses to opioid overdose fatalities in four adjacent rural counties in Western Pennsylvania. Using a semi-structured interview guide, 16 individuals who had experienced one or more overdoses were interviewed. Using NVivo, the transcribed audio-recorded interviews were coded, and a thematic analysis of the coded text was conducted. : Findings reveal that of the 29 overdoses that included a THN intervention, only eight resulted in treatment. The analysis derives five individual-level barriers to treatment: (1) opioid dependence, (2) denial/readiness, (3) opioid withdrawal fears, (4) incarceration concerns, and (5) stigma and shame. These barriers impeded treatment, even though all the interviewees knew of treatment programs, how to access them, and in some cases had undergone treatment previously. : findings indicate that there is evidence that the five barriers make entering treatment after a THN intervention challenging and seemingly insurmountable at times. Recommendations based on the findings include increasing efforts to reduce stigma of OUDs in the community, including self-stigma resulting from misusing opioids, increasing informational efforts about Good Samaritan Laws, and increasing familiarity with medication-assisted treatments for OUDS.

摘要

研究表明,阿巴拉契亚农村地区的家庭携带纳洛酮(THN)正在拯救生命,但它是否也能导致阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的治疗,目前仍不清楚。本研究通过对 16 名曾因阿片类药物过量而 61 次过量用药的个体进行详细的定性分析,旨在了解为什么 THN 干预措施通常不会导致 OUD 治疗。

本研究建立在宾夕法尼亚州西部四个相邻农村县对阿片类药物过量死亡事件的为期一年(2018 年)的定性研究基础上。使用半结构化访谈指南,对 16 名经历过一次或多次过量用药的个体进行了访谈。使用 NVivo 对转录的音频记录访谈进行编码,并对编码文本进行主题分析。

研究结果表明,在 29 次包括 THN 干预的过量用药中,只有 8 次导致治疗。分析得出了五个个体层面的治疗障碍:(1)阿片类药物依赖,(2)否认/准备,(3)阿片类药物戒断恐惧,(4)监禁担忧,(5)耻辱和羞耻。这些障碍阻碍了治疗,尽管所有受访者都知道治疗方案、如何获得治疗,并且在某些情况下之前已经接受过治疗。

研究结果表明,有证据表明,这五个障碍使得在 THN 干预后接受治疗具有挑战性,有时似乎难以克服。基于研究结果提出的建议包括加大努力减少社区中 OUD 的耻辱感,包括因滥用阿片类药物而产生的自我耻辱感,增加关于好撒玛利亚人法的信息宣传,以及增加对 OUD 药物辅助治疗的了解。

相似文献

1
Opioid Overdoses and Take-Home Naloxone Interventions: Ethnographic Evidence for Individual-Level Barriers to Treatment of Opioid Use Disorders in Rural Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚农村地区阿片类药物过量和纳洛酮带回家干预措施:个体层面治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的障碍的民族志证据。
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(9):1313-1322. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2340986. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care.用于癌症患者和接受姑息治疗患者的阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD006332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006332.pub3.
4
The opportunity to save a life: A qualitative study of a point-of-care overdose education and naloxone distribution intervention.挽救生命的契机:一项关于即时护理过量用药教育及纳洛酮分发干预措施的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0326495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326495. eCollection 2025.
5
Agent-Based Model of Combined Community- and Jail-Based Take-Home Naloxone Distribution.基于主体模型的社区与监狱联合发放纳洛酮带回家计划
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2448732. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48732.
6
Organizational perspectives on the impacts of scaling up overdose education and naloxone distribution in Kentucky.关于在肯塔基州扩大过量用药教育和纳洛酮分发影响的组织观点。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 14;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00553-2.
7
Take-Home Naloxone in Opioid Dependency: An Intervention to Reduce Opioid-Related Deaths.阿片类药物依赖中的纳洛酮带回家计划:一项减少阿片类药物相关死亡的干预措施。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2025 May 2;122(9):240-244. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0030.
8
Does naloxone provision lead to increased substance use? A systematic review to assess if there is evidence of a 'moral hazard' associated with naloxone supply.纳洛酮供应是否会导致药物使用增加?一项系统评价评估与纳洛酮供应相关的“道德风险”是否存在证据。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Feb;100:103513. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103513. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
9
Factors Associated with Non-Evidence-Based Overdose Responses among People Who Use Prescription Opioids Non-Medically in Rural Appalachia.农村阿巴拉契亚地区非医疗使用处方类鸦片的人群中与非基于证据的过量反应相关的因素。
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(2):163-170. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2135967. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
10
Do heroin overdose patients require observation after receiving naloxone?海洛因过量患者在接受纳洛酮治疗后需要观察吗?
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2017 Feb;55(2):81-87. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2016.1253846. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonfatal Overdose Biosurveillance: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.非致命性药物过量生物监测:一项横断面试点研究。
Public Health Rep. 2025 Sep 12:333549251358671. doi: 10.1177/00333549251358671.