• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

500 例机器人肝切除术学习曲线分析。

Learning curve analysis after 500 robotic hepatectomies.

机构信息

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Digestive Health Institute AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, United States.

Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Digestive Health Institute AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, United States.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul;28(7):1039-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.04.012. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2024.04.012
PMID:38636723
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The robotic platform is growing in popularity for hepatobiliary resections. Although the learning curve for basic competency has been reported, this is the first study to analyze the learning curve to achieve long-term mastery on a decade of experience with more than 500 robotic hepatectomies.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, 500 consecutive robotic hepatectomies from 2013 to 2023 were analyzed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis using operative duration was used to determine the learning curves.

RESULTS

A total of 500 patients were included in this study: composed of 230 men (46.0 %) and 270 women (54.0 %), aged 63.0 (61.0 ± 14.6) years, with a body mass index of 28.0 (29.0 ± 8.0) kg/m, a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 7 (8 ± 3.0), an albumin-bilirubin score of -3.0 (-3.0 ± 0.6), and a Child-Pugh score of 5.0 (5.0 ± 0.7). Operative duration was 235.0 (260.1 ± 131.9) minutes, estimated blood loss was 100.0 (165.0 ± 208.1) mL, tumor size was 4.0 (5.0 ± 3.5) cm, and 94.0 % of patients achieved R0 margins. The length of hospital stay was 3.0 (4.0 ± 3.7) days, with 4.0 % of patient having major complications. Of note, 30-day readmission was 17.0 %, 30-day mortality was 2.0 %, and 90-day mortality was 3.0 %. On CUSUM analysis, the learning curve for minor resection (n = 215) was 75 cases, major resection (n = 154) was 100 cases, and technically challenging minor resection (n = 131) was 57 cases. Gaining more experience in performing surgical procedures resulted in shorter operative duration, lower blood loss, higher R0 resections, and lower major postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

The minimum number of robotic hepatectomies to overcome the learning curves for mastery of minor, major, and technically challenging minor resections was significant. Our study can help guide surgeons in their early experience to optimize patient safety and outcomes.

摘要

背景

机器人平台在肝胆切除术中越来越受欢迎。尽管已经报道了基本能力的学习曲线,但这是第一项分析长达十年经验的 500 多例机器人肝切除术以实现长期掌握的学习曲线的研究。

方法

在获得机构审查委员会批准后,对 2013 年至 2023 年的 500 例连续机器人肝切除术进行了分析。使用手术时间的累积和 (CUSUM) 分析来确定学习曲线。

结果

本研究共纳入 500 例患者:由 230 名男性(46.0%)和 270 名女性(54.0%)组成,年龄 63.0(61.0±14.6)岁,体重指数为 28.0(29.0±8.0)kg/m,终末期肝病模型评分 7(8±3.0),白蛋白-胆红素评分-3.0(-3.0±0.6),Child-Pugh 评分 5.0(5.0±0.7)。手术时间为 235.0(260.1±131.9)分钟,估计出血量为 100.0(165.0±208.1)mL,肿瘤大小为 4.0(5.0±3.5)cm,94.0%的患者达到 R0 切缘。住院时间为 3.0(4.0±3.7)天,4.0%的患者发生严重并发症。值得注意的是,30 天再入院率为 17.0%,30 天死亡率为 2.0%,90 天死亡率为 3.0%。在 CUSUM 分析中,小切除(n=215)的学习曲线为 75 例,大切除(n=154)为 100 例,技术上具有挑战性的小切除(n=131)为 57 例。在执行手术程序方面积累更多经验可缩短手术时间、降低出血量、提高 R0 切除率和降低术后严重并发症发生率。

结论

克服小、大、技术上具有挑战性的小切除掌握的学习曲线所需的机器人肝切除术的最低数量具有显著意义。我们的研究可以帮助指导外科医生的早期经验,以优化患者的安全性和结果。

相似文献

1
Learning curve analysis after 500 robotic hepatectomies.500 例机器人肝切除术学习曲线分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul;28(7):1039-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.04.012. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
A decade of experience with 530 minimally invasive robotic hepatectomies from a single tertiary hepatobiliary center: analysis of short-term outcomes and oncologic survival.单中心十年来 530 例微创机器人肝切除术的经验:短期结果和肿瘤生存分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Aug;28(8):1273-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.05.030. Epub 2024 May 29.
3
Robotic major hepatectomy: Is there a learning curve?机器人辅助肝大部切除术:是否存在学习曲线?
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):642-649. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.025. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
4
Single-Institution Early Experience and Learning Curve with Robotic Liver Resections.单机构机器人肝切除术的早期经验及学习曲线
Am Surg. 2019 Jan 1;85(1):115-119.
5
Institutional First 100 Case Experience and Outcomes of Robotic Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors.机构开展的首例100例肝脏肿瘤机器人肝切除术的经验及结果
Am Surg. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):200-207.
6
A Single Institution's Experience With Robotic Minor and Major Hepatectomy.单中心机器人辅助肝段切除术和肝叶切除术经验
Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):1387-1391. doi: 10.1177/00031348211047500. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
7
Robotic major and minor hepatectomy: critical appraisal of learning curve and its impact on outcomes.机器人辅助肝大部切除术和肝小部切除术:学习曲线的批判性评估及其对手术结果的影响
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2915-2922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09809-3. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
8
10 years, 100 robotic major hepatectomies: a single-center experience.10 年,100 例机器人辅助肝切除术:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):902-907. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10459-2. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
9
The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: Will it be more effective and smooth?2008年路易斯维尔声明后腹腔镜肝切除术的学习曲线:它会更有效且更顺利吗?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2895-903. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4575-1. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
Robotic Liver Resection: A Case-Matched Comparison.机器人肝脏切除术:病例匹配比较
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1422-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3446-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A decade-long prospective analysis of the learning curve after 435 robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies from a single tertiary institution.对来自单一三级医疗机构的435例机器人胰十二指肠切除术术后学习曲线的十年前瞻性分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 11;19(1):376. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02553-5.
2
Learning curve analysis of 100 consecutive robotic liver resections.连续100例机器人肝脏切除术的学习曲线分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2512-2522. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11551-5. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
3
Robotic Extended Right Posterior Sectionectomy with En Bloc Diaphragm Resection: Application of Minimally Invasive Technique for Perihepatic Organ Resection.
机器人辅助扩大右后叶肝切除术联合整块膈肌切除术:微创技术在肝周器官切除中的应用
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2474-2475. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16595-w. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for difficult posterosuperior segments: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗困难的肝后上段肝切除术:一项倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):64-76. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11428-z. Epub 2024 Dec 2.