• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗困难的肝后上段肝切除术:一项倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价与荟萃分析

Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for difficult posterosuperior segments: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies.

作者信息

Giannone Fabio, Cassese Gianluca, Del Basso Celeste, Alagia Mariantonietta, Palucci Marco, Sangiuolo Federico, Panaro Fabrizio

机构信息

Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary, Oncologic and Robotic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.

HPB and Robotic Surgery Research Unit, Department of Research and Innovation (DAIRI), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):64-76. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11428-z. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11428-z
PMID:39623177
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of minimally invasive liver surgery for posterosuperior segments (PS) are still debated. Since the results of ongoing trials focusing on the results of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and robotic liver resection (RLR) in this setting are still awaited, the best evidence currently comes from retrospective propensity-score matched (PSM) studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes of RLR for difficult located lesions and to provide evidence for its use in clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LLR and RLR for PS segments. The Medline, Embase and Web of Science Library electronic databases were searched to identify available research published up to June 2024.

RESULTS

Five studies with a total of 2907 patients (RLR: n = 1084; LLR: n = 1823) were included in the meta-analysis. The RLR group had less estimated blood loss (EBL) (MD: - 88.3, 95% CI - 144.2-- 32.3; p = 0.012), fewer blood transfusions (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.39-0.80, p = 0.033), and a shorter operative time (MD - 27.3, 95% CI - 49.4-- 5.1; p = 0.027). No differences in postoperative morbidity, mortality and R1 resection rates were observed.

CONCLUSION

RLR for lesions in the PS segments are safe and effective, and may have superior surgical outcomes than LLR.

摘要

背景

后上肝段(PS)的微创肝脏手术效果仍存在争议。由于聚焦于此情况下腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)和机器人辅助肝切除术(RLR)结果的正在进行的试验结果仍未可知,目前最佳证据来自回顾性倾向评分匹配(PSM)研究。本荟萃分析的目的是评估RLR治疗位置困难病变的效果,并为其在临床实践中的应用提供证据。

方法

进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估LLR和RLR治疗PS段的安全性和有效性。检索了Medline、Embase和科学网图书馆电子数据库,以识别截至2024年6月发表的可用研究。

结果

五项研究共纳入2907例患者(RLR:n = 1084;LLR:n = 1823)进行荟萃分析。RLR组估计失血量(EBL)较少(MD:- 88.3,95%CI - 144.2-- 32.3;p = 0.012),输血次数较少(OR 0.70,95%CI 0.39 - 0.80,p = 0.033),手术时间较短(MD - 27.3,95%CI - 49.4-- 5.1;p = 0.027)。术后发病率、死亡率和R1切除率未见差异。

结论

RLR治疗PS段病变安全有效,手术效果可能优于LLR。

相似文献

1
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for difficult posterosuperior segments: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗困难的肝后上段肝切除术:一项倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):64-76. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11428-z. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗后上肝段:系统评价和荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Sep;26(9):1089-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in posterosuperior region: a retrospective study of consecutive cases.机器人与腹腔镜肝后上区切除术:连续病例的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4728-4736. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09952-5. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
4
Efficacy and safety of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性:倾向评分匹配回顾性队列研究。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Aug;18(4):1271-1285. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10658-6. Epub 2024 May 13.
5
Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic liver resection: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术短期疗效的比较:倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1126-1138. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000857.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Lesions Located on Posterosuperior Segments: A Meta-Analysis of Short-term Outcomes.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝后上段病变的安全性和有效性:短期结局的Meta分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Aug;28(4):203-208. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000562.
7
Initial Experience With Robotic Liver Resection in the United States.美国机器人肝切除术的初步经验。
Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):2933-2939. doi: 10.1177/00031348241259043. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resections for hepatolithiasis: an international multicenter propensity score matched analysis.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石病:国际多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5855-5864. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10051-8. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
9
Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除术的临床疗效:荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
10
An international multicenter propensity-score matched and coarsened-exact matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic partial liver resections of the anterolateral segments.国际多中心倾向评分匹配和粗糙精确匹配分析比较机器人与腹腔镜前外侧肝段部分切除术。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Aug;29(8):843-854. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1149. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
An Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patient with von Willebrand Disease Successfully Treated with Robotic Hepatectomy under von Willebrand Factor Supplementation.一名患有血管性血友病的肝内胆管癌患者在补充血管性血友病因子的情况下成功接受机器人肝切除术治疗。
Surg Case Rep. 2025;11(1). doi: 10.70352/scrj.cr.25-0188. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Laparoscopic Versus Open Caudate Lobe Resection: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.腹腔镜与开放尾状叶切除术:一项对比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 21;14(13):4421. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134421.
3
Comparison of robotic liver resection in obese vs. non-obese patients: a multicentric propensity score-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hemihepatectomy: The ORANGE II PLUS Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹半肝切除术的比较:ORANGE II PLUS 多中心随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 May 20;42(15):1799-1809. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01019. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
2
Learning curve analysis after 500 robotic hepatectomies.500 例机器人肝切除术学习曲线分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul;28(7):1039-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.04.012. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study of 10.075 Patients.
肥胖与非肥胖患者机器人肝切除术的比较:围手术期结局的多中心倾向评分匹配分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02303-0.
4
Postoperative Outcomes After Robotic Liver Resection of Caudate Lobe: A Systematic Review.机器人肝尾状叶切除术后的手术结果:一项系统综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 29;61(1):34. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010034.
5
Robotic liver parenchymal transection techniques: a comprehensive overview and classification.机器人肝脏实质离断技术:全面概述与分类
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 30;19(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02200-5.
机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术在各种情况下的比较:一项 10075 例患者的国际多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jul 1;280(1):108-117. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006267. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
4
Evolution of laparoscopic liver resection in the last two decades: lessons from 2000 cases at a referral Korean center.过去二十年腹腔镜肝切除术的发展:来自韩国一家转诊中心2000例病例的经验教训。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1200-1210. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10580-2. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for liver malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗肝脏恶性肿瘤的比较:倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):56-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10561-5. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
6
Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic liver resection: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术短期疗效的比较:倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1126-1138. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000857.
7
Propensity Score-Matching Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Limited Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: An International Multicenter Study.倾向评分匹配分析比较后上段有限肝切除术的机器人手术与腹腔镜手术:一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 1;279(2):297-305. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006027. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
8
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Open Conversion During Minimally Invasive Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study on 3880 Procedures Comparing the Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches.微创大宗肝切除术中开腹转化的风险因素和结果:腹腔镜和机器人两种方法比较的国际多中心 3880 例研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):4783-4796. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13525-0. Epub 2023 May 18.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in posterosuperior region: a retrospective study of consecutive cases.机器人与腹腔镜肝后上区切除术:连续病例的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4728-4736. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09952-5. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
10
The democratizing effects of robotic surgery: Nine HPB manoeuvres exactly reproduced by the da vinci system.机器人手术的民主化效应:达芬奇系统精确重现的九种肝脏、胰腺和胆管手术操作
Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;44:101822. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101822. Epub 2022 Aug 30.