Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Universitätsspital Zürich, Department of Emergency Medicine, Zürich, Switzerland.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2024 Jun-Jul;71(6):427-437. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
BACKGROUND: Anaesthesiology training programs in Europe vary in duration, content, and requirements for completion. This survey-based study conducted by the Trainees Committee of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care explores current anaesthesia training designs across Europe. METHODS: Between May and July 2018, we sent a 41-item online questionnaire to all National Trainee Representatives, members of the National Anaesthesiologists Societies Committee, and Council Representatives of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) of all member countries. We cross-validated inconsistent data with different country representatives. RESULTS: Forty-three anaesthesiologists from all 39 associated ESAIC countries completed the questionnaire. Results showed considerable variability in teaching formats, frequency of teaching sessions during training, and differences in assessments made during and at the end of training. The reported duration of training was 60 months in 59% (n = 23) of participating countries, ranging from 24 months in Russia and Ukraine to 84 months in the UK. CONCLUSION: This study shows the significant differences in anaesthesiology training formats across Europe, and highlights the importance of developing standardised training programs to ensure a consistent level of training and to improve patient safety. This study provides valuable insights into European anaesthesia training, and underlines the need for further research and collaboration to improve requirements.
背景:欧洲的麻醉学培训项目在持续时间、内容和完成要求方面存在差异。本项由欧洲麻醉学会和重症监护协会培训委员会进行的基于调查的研究,旨在探索欧洲当前的麻醉培训设计。
方法:在 2018 年 5 月至 7 月期间,我们向所有国家培训代表、国家麻醉师协会委员会成员以及欧洲麻醉学会和重症监护协会(ESAIC)的理事会代表(来自所有成员国)发送了一份包含 41 个问题的在线问卷。我们使用不同国家的代表交叉验证了不一致的数据。
结果:来自所有 39 个相关 ESAIC 国家的 43 名麻醉师完成了问卷。结果显示,在教学形式、培训期间教学课程的频率以及培训期间和结束时进行的评估方面存在相当大的差异。报告的培训时间在参与国中有 59%(n=23)为 60 个月,范围从俄罗斯和乌克兰的 24 个月到英国的 84 个月。
结论:本研究表明,欧洲的麻醉学培训模式存在显著差异,并强调了制定标准化培训计划的重要性,以确保培训的一致性并提高患者安全性。本研究提供了对欧洲麻醉培训的宝贵见解,并强调了进一步研究和合作以提高要求的必要性。
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2024
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-8-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-8
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022-10-1
J Health Organ Manag. 2025-6-30
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2024-9-20