• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动化计算机辅助风险评分系统对 COVID-19 风险评估的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。

Accuracy of automated computer-aided risk scoring systems to estimate the risk of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Centre for Digital Innovations in Health & Social Care, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2024 Apr 18;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06773-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-024-06773-0
PMID:38637897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11027522/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the UK National Health Service (NHS), the patient's vital signs are monitored and summarised into a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) score. A set of computer-aided risk scoring systems (CARSS) was developed and validated for predicting in-hospital mortality and sepsis in unplanned admission to hospital using NEWS and routine blood tests results. We sought to assess the accuracy of these models to predict the risk of COVID-19 in unplanned admissions during the first phase of the pandemic.

METHODS

Adult ( > = 18 years) non-elective admissions discharged (alive/deceased) between 11-March-2020 to 13-June-2020 from two acute hospitals with an index NEWS electronically recorded within ± 24 h of admission. We identified COVID-19 admission based on ICD-10 code 'U071' which was determined by COVID-19 swab test results (hospital or community). We assessed the performance of CARSS (CARS_N, CARS_NB, CARM_N, CARM_NB) for predicting the risk of COVID-19 in terms of discrimination (c-statistic) and calibration (graphically).

RESULTS

The risk of in-hospital mortality following emergency medical admission was 8.4% (500/6444) and 9.6% (620/6444) had a diagnosis of COVID-19. For predicting COVID-19 admissions, the CARS_N model had the highest discrimination 0.73 (0.71 to 0.75) and calibration slope 0.81 (0.72 to 0.89) compared to other CARSS models: CARM_N (discrimination:0.68 (0.66 to 0.70) and calibration slope 0.47 (0.41 to 0.54)), CARM_NB (discrimination:0.68 (0.65 to 0.70) and calibration slope 0.37 (0.31 to 0.43)), and CARS_NB (discrimination:0.68 (0.66 to 0.70) and calibration slope 0.56 (0.47 to 0.64)).

CONCLUSIONS

The CARS_N model is reasonably accurate for predicting the risk of COVID-19. It may be clinically useful as an early warning system at the time of admission especially to triage large numbers of unplanned admissions because it requires no additional data collection and is readily automated.

摘要

背景

在英国国民保健制度(NHS)中,患者的生命体征被监测并汇总为国家早期预警评分(NEWS)评分。已经开发并验证了一组计算机辅助风险评分系统(CARSS),用于使用 NEWS 和常规血液检查结果预测计划外入院的院内死亡率和败血症。我们试图评估这些模型在大流行的第一阶段预测计划外入院 COVID-19 风险的准确性。

方法

2020 年 3 月 11 日至 6 月 13 日期间,从两家急性医院出院的(存活/死亡)成年(≥18 岁)非择期入院患者,入院后 24 小时内电子记录了指数 NEWS。我们根据 ICD-10 代码 'U071' 确定 COVID-19 入院,该代码是通过 COVID-19 拭子检测结果(医院或社区)确定的。我们评估了 CARSS(CARS_N、CARS_NB、CARM_N、CARM_NB)在预测 COVID-19 风险方面的表现,包括区分度(c 统计量)和校准(图形)。

结果

急诊入院后院内死亡率的风险为 8.4%(500/6444),有 9.6%(620/6444)被诊断为 COVID-19。对于预测 COVID-19 入院,CARS_N 模型具有最高的区分度 0.73(0.71 至 0.75)和校准斜率 0.81(0.72 至 0.89),而其他 CARSS 模型则为:CARM_N(区分度:0.68(0.66 至 0.70)和校准斜率 0.47(0.41 至 0.54))、CARM_NB(区分度:0.68(0.65 至 0.70)和校准斜率 0.37(0.31 至 0.43))和 CARS_NB(区分度:0.68(0.66 至 0.70)和校准斜率 0.56(0.47 至 0.64))。

结论

CARS_N 模型在预测 COVID-19 风险方面具有合理的准确性。它可能具有临床实用性,作为入院时的早期预警系统,特别是在分诊大量计划外入院患者时,因为它不需要额外的数据收集并且易于自动化。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of automated computer-aided risk scoring systems to estimate the risk of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.自动化计算机辅助风险评分系统对 COVID-19 风险评估的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Apr 18;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06773-0.
2
Development and validation of a novel computer-aided score to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality for acutely ill medical admissions in two acute hospitals using their first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs: a cross-sectional study.开发和验证一种新的计算机辅助评分,以预测两家急症医院使用首次电子记录的血液检查结果和生命体征的急性入院患者住院期间死亡风险:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 6;8(12):e022939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022939.
3
Predictive accuracy of enhanced versions of the on-admission National Early Warning Score in estimating the risk of COVID-19 for unplanned admission to hospital: a retrospective development and validation study.入院时增强版国家早期预警评分对预测 COVID-19 非计划性入院风险的准确性:一项回顾性开发和验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06951-x.
4
Development and validation of automated computer-aided risk scores to predict in-hospital mortality for emergency medical admissions with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort development and validation study.开发和验证自动化计算机辅助风险评分模型,以预测 COVID-19 急诊入院患者的住院死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究的开发和验证。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 30;12(8):e050274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050274.
5
External validation of the computer aided risk scoring system in predicting in-hospital mortality following emergency medical admissions.急诊医疗入院后院内死亡率预测的计算机辅助风险评分系统的外部验证。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Aug;188:105497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105497. Epub 2024 May 18.
6
Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study.使用入院后 24 小时内记录的首个国家早期预警评分来评估非计划性 COVID-19 患者住院期间死亡风险的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e043721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043721.
7
Performance of externally validated enhanced computer-aided versions of the National Early Warning Score in predicting mortality following an emergency admission to hospital in England: a cross-sectional study.外部验证的增强版国家早期预警评分在预测英国急诊入院后死亡率方面的性能:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e031596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031596.
8
Development and External Validation of an Automated Computer-Aided Risk Score for Predicting Sepsis in Emergency Medical Admissions Using the Patient's First Electronically Recorded Vital Signs and Blood Test Results.开发并验证一种基于患者首次电子记录的生命体征和血液检查结果的自动计算机辅助风险评分,用于预测急诊入院患者发生脓毒症的风险。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):612-618. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002967.
9
Understanding and applying practitioner and patient views on the implementation of a novel automated Computer-Aided Risk Score (CARS) predicting the risk of death following emergency medical admission to hospital: qualitative study.理解和应用从业者和患者对新型自动化计算机辅助风险评分 (CARS) 的实施的看法,该评分用于预测因紧急医疗入院后死亡的风险:定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 23;9(4):e026591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026591.
10
A prospective study of consecutive emergency medical admissions to compare a novel automated computer-aided mortality risk score and clinical judgement of patient mortality risk.一项连续急诊入院的前瞻性研究,旨在比较新型自动化计算机辅助死亡率风险评分与临床判断患者死亡率风险。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 19;9(6):e027741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027741.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of automated computer-aided risk scores to predict in-hospital mortality for emergency medical admissions with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort development and validation study.开发和验证自动化计算机辅助风险评分模型,以预测 COVID-19 急诊入院患者的住院死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究的开发和验证。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 30;12(8):e050274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050274.
2
Predictive Models of Mortality for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study.新冠病毒肺炎住院患者死亡的预测模型:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Oct 15;8(10):e21788. doi: 10.2196/21788.
3
Early prediction of level-of-care requirements in patients with COVID-19.
对 COVID-19 患者的医疗照护需求进行早期预测。
Elife. 2020 Oct 12;9:e60519. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60519.
4
Sepsis and Coronavirus Disease 2019: Common Features and Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutic Approaches.脓毒症与 2019 年冠状病毒病:共同特征与抗炎治疗策略。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1841-1844. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004625.
5
Understanding pathways to death in patients with COVID-19.了解新冠病毒肺炎患者的死亡途径。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):430-432. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30165-X. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.COVID-19 诊断和预后预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328.
7
Case-Fatality Rate and Characteristics of Patients Dying in Relation to COVID-19 in Italy.意大利新冠肺炎死亡患者的病死率及特征
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1775-1776. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4683.
8
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国武汉成人 COVID-19 住院患者的临床病程和死亡危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
9
The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2.严重急性呼吸综合征相关冠状病毒:将 2019-nCoV 进行分类并命名为 SARS-CoV-2。
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Apr;5(4):536-544. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
10
Performance of externally validated enhanced computer-aided versions of the National Early Warning Score in predicting mortality following an emergency admission to hospital in England: a cross-sectional study.外部验证的增强版国家早期预警评分在预测英国急诊入院后死亡率方面的性能:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e031596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031596.