• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估直肠癌管理临床实践指南:它们做对了吗?

Evaluating clinical practice guidelines for the management of rectal cancer: Did they get it RIGHT?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, New Hampshire, Lebanon.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;129(8):1475-1480. doi: 10.1002/jso.27648. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1002/jso.27648
PMID:38638010
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are crucial tools for clinicians seeking to deliver evidence-based patient care. We utilized the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) checklist to assess the reporting quality of CPGs addressing the management of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Four multidisciplinary rectal cancer CPGs published 2017-2022 were evaluated: American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). We quantitatively assessed each CPG using the RIGHT checklist and qualitative analysis was performed to generate common themes.

RESULTS

RIGHT checklist items fulfilled by each CPG ranged from 12 to 17 (out of 22). Each guideline demonstrated unique categories of weakness: ASCRS in Basic Information (1 of 4 items), ESMO in Evidence (1 of 3), NCCN in Recommendations (1 of 3), and NICE in Review and Quality Assurance (0 of 2). Common themes that emerged included sprase discussion on the financial aspects of rectal cancer management and lack of transparency in formulating recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their variability, each of the 22 checklist elements are present in contemporary CPGs. Utilizing the RIGHT checklist would allow experts to create guidelines adhering to high-quality reporting standards.

摘要

背景与目的

临床实践指南(CPGs)是临床医生提供循证患者护理的重要工具。我们利用医疗保健实践指南报告条目(RIGHT)清单评估了 2017 年至 2022 年期间发布的针对直肠癌管理的 CPG 的报告质量。

方法

评估了 4 项多学科直肠癌 CPG:美国结直肠外科医师学会(ASCRS)、欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)、美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)和英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)。我们使用 RIGHT 清单对每个 CPG 进行了定量评估,并进行了定性分析以生成共同主题。

结果

每个 CPG 满足的 RIGHT 清单项目数量为 12 至 17 项(共 22 项)。每个指南都表现出独特的弱点类别:ASCRS 在基本信息方面(4 项中的 1 项)、ESMO 在证据方面(3 项中的 1 项)、NCCN 在建议方面(3 项中的 1 项),以及 NICE 在审查和质量保证方面(2 项中无 1 项)。出现的共同主题包括对直肠癌管理的财务方面的讨论不充分以及在制定建议方面缺乏透明度。

结论

尽管存在差异,但当代 CPG 中都包含了 22 个清单要素中的每一个。利用 RIGHT 清单可以让专家制定符合高质量报告标准的指南。

相似文献

1
Evaluating clinical practice guidelines for the management of rectal cancer: Did they get it RIGHT?评估直肠癌管理临床实践指南:它们做对了吗?
J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;129(8):1475-1480. doi: 10.1002/jso.27648. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
Reporting quality of polycystic ovary syndrome practice guidelines based on the RIGHT checklist.基于RIGHT清单的多囊卵巢综合征实践指南报告质量
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22624. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022624.
3
Evaluation of the NCCN guidelines using the RIGHT Statement and AGREE-II instrument: a cross-sectional review.使用 RIGHT 声明和 AGREE-II 工具评估 NCCN 指南:一项横断面回顾。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Dec;24(6):219-226. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111153. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
4
A reporting quality evaluation of the clinical practice guidelines for bladder cancer based on the RIGHT checklist.基于RIGHT清单的膀胱癌临床实践指南报告质量评价
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Nov;11(11):1586-1597. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-712.
5
Evaluation of the Clarity and Completeness of Reporting in Orthopedic Clinical Practice Guidelines.骨科临床实践指南报告的清晰度与完整性评估
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;120(2):74-80. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.017.
6
Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on lung cancer using the RIGHT checklist.使用RIGHT清单评估肺癌临床实践指南的报告质量。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jun;10(6):2588-2602. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-405.
7
Adherence to the RIGHT statement in Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines.遵守介入放射学学会指南中的 RIGHT 声明。
J Osteopath Med. 2021 Jan 1;121(1):11-24. doi: 10.1515/jom-2020-0024.
8
Reporting quality of 2014-2018 clinical practice guidelines on diabetes according to the RIGHT checklist.2014-2018 年糖尿病临床实践指南报告质量的 RIGHT 清单评估。
Endocrine. 2019 Sep;65(3):531-541. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-02005-9. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
9
Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on prostate cancer using the RIGHT checklist.使用RIGHT清单评估前列腺癌临床实践指南的报告质量。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1173. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-2956.
10
Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on pancreatic cancer using the RIGHT checklist.使用RIGHT清单评估胰腺癌临床实践指南的报告质量。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(13):1088. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-2644.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an assessment based on the AGREE II, AGREE-REX tools and the RIGHT checklist.头颈部鳞状细胞癌治疗的临床实践指南:基于AGREE II、AGREE-REX工具及RIGHT清单的评估
Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 18;14:1442657. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1442657. eCollection 2024.