Rivero-Gallegos Daphne, Mejía Mayra, Rocha-González Héctor I, Huerta-Cruz Juan C, Falfán-Valencia Ramcés, Ramos-Martínez Espiridion, Mateos-Toledo Heidegger N, Castillo-López María F, Rodríguez-Torres Yeimi K, Lira-Boussart Valeria, Rojas-Serrano Jorge
Interstitial Lung Disease and Rheumatology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas, Calzada de Tlalpan 4502, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sección de Estudios de Posgrado E Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico.
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Jun;43(6):1971-1978. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06965-w. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
To evaluate whether anti-PL7 and anti-PL12 autoantibodies are associated with a greater extent of the fibrotic component of ILD in ASSD patients.
Patients with ILD-ASSD who were positive for one of the following autoantibodies: anti-Jo1, anti-PL7, anti-PL12, and anti-EJ were included. Clinical manifestations, CPK levels, pulmonary function tests, and HCRT assessments were prospectively collected according to the Goh index. The fibrotic, inflammatory, and overall extension of the Goh index and DL were assessed by multiple linear analyses and compared between ASSD antibody subgroups.
Sixty-six patients were included; 17 were positive for anti-Jo1 (26%), 17 for anti-PL7 (26%), 20 for anti-PL12 (30%), and 9 (14%) for anti-EJ. Patients with anti-PL7 and anti-PL12 had a more extensive fibrotic component than anti-Jo1. Anti-PL7 patients had a 7.9% increase in the fibrotic extension (cβ = 7.9; 95% CI 1.863, 13.918), and the strength of the association was not modified after controlling for sex, age, and time of disease evolution (aβ = 7.9; 95% CI 0.677, 15.076) and also was associated with an increase in ILD severity after adjusting for the same variables, denoted by a lower DL (aβ = - 4.47; 95% CI - 8.919 to - 0.015).
Anti-PL7-positive ASSD patients had more extensive fibrosis and severe ILD than the anti-Jo1 subgroup. This information is clinically useful and has significant implications for managing these patients, suggesting the need for early consideration of concurrent immunosuppressive and antifibrotic therapy.
评估抗PL7和抗PL12自身抗体是否与抗合成酶综合征(ASSD)患者间质性肺病(ILD)纤维化成分的更广泛程度相关。
纳入抗Jo1、抗PL7、抗PL12和抗EJ这几种自身抗体中任一种呈阳性的ILD-ASSD患者。根据Goh指数前瞻性收集临床表现、肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)水平、肺功能测试和高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HCRT)评估结果。通过多元线性分析评估Goh指数和弥散量(DL)的纤维化、炎症及总体范围,并在ASSD抗体亚组之间进行比较。
共纳入66例患者;17例抗Jo1阳性(26%),17例抗PL7阳性(26%),20例抗PL12阳性(30%),9例抗EJ阳性(14%)。抗PL7和抗PL12患者的纤维化成分比抗Jo1患者更广泛。抗PL7患者的纤维化范围增加7.9%(cβ = 7.9;95%置信区间1.863,13.918),在控制性别、年龄和疾病进展时间后,关联强度未改变(aβ = 7.9;95%置信区间0.677,15.076),并且在调整相同变量后也与ILD严重程度增加相关(以较低的DL表示)(aβ = -4.47;95%置信区间-8.919至-0.015)。
抗PL7阳性的ASSD患者比抗Jo1亚组有更广泛的纤维化和更严重的ILD。这一信息在临床上有用,对这些患者的管理具有重要意义,提示需要尽早考虑同时进行免疫抑制和抗纤维化治疗。