Gourdy Pierre, Darmon Patrice, Borget Isabelle, Emery Corinne, Bureau Isabelle, Detournay Bruno, Bahloul Amar, Allali Noemie, Mahieu Aymeric, Penfornis Alfred
Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases, UMR1297 INSERM/UPS, Toulouse University, Toulouse, France.
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Jun;15(6):1349-1360. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01577-8. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
Second-generation basal insulins like glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) have a longer duration of action and less daily fluctuation and interday variability than first-generation ones, such as glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100). The EF-BI study, a nationwide observational, retrospective study, was designed to compare persistence, acute care complications, and healthcare costs associated with the initiation of such basal insulins (BI) in a real-life setting in France.
This study was conducted using the French healthcare claims database (SNDS). Adult patients living with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM) initiating Gla-300 or Gla-100 ± other hypoglycemic medications between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020, and without any insulin therapy over the previous 6 months were included. Persistence was defined as remaining on the same insulin therapy until discontinuation defined by a 6 month period without insulin reimbursement. Hospitalized acute complications were identified using ICD-10 codes. Total collective costs were established for patients treated continuously with each basal insulin over 1-3 years. All comparisons were adjusted using a propensity score based on initial patient/treatment characteristics.
A total of 235,894 patients with T2DM and 6672 patients with T1DM were included. Patients treated with Gla-300 were 83% (T1DM) and 44% (T2DM) less likely to discontinue their treatment than those treated with Gla-100 after 24 months (p < 0.0001). The annual incidence of acute hospitalized events in patients with T2DM treated with Gla-300 was 12% lower than with Gla-100 (p < 0.0001) but similar in patients with T1DM. Comparison of overall costs showed moderate but statistically significant differences in favor of Gla-300 versus Gla-100 for all patients over the first year, and in T2DM only over a 3-year follow-up.
Use of Gla-300 resulted in a better persistence, less acute hospitalized events at least in T2DM, and reduced healthcare expenditure. These real-life results confirmed the potential interest of using Gla-300 rather than Gla-100.
与第一代基础胰岛素(如甘精胰岛素100U/mL,Gla-100)相比,第二代基础胰岛素如甘精胰岛素300U/mL(Gla-300)作用持续时间更长,每日波动和日间变异性更小。EF-BI研究是一项全国性观察性回顾性研究,旨在比较在法国现实生活环境中起始使用此类基础胰岛素(BI)后的持续性、急性护理并发症及医疗费用。
本研究使用法国医疗保健索赔数据库(SNDS)。纳入2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间起始使用Gla-300或Gla-100±其他降糖药物、且在过去6个月内未接受任何胰岛素治疗的1型或2型糖尿病(T1DM或T2DM)成年患者。持续性定义为持续使用同一种胰岛素治疗,直至停药,停药定义为连续6个月无胰岛素报销。使用国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)编码识别住院急性并发症。确定了接受每种基础胰岛素持续治疗1至3年患者的总集体费用。所有比较均根据基于患者初始特征/治疗的倾向评分进行调整。
共纳入235,894例T2DM患者和6672例T1DM患者。24个月后,与接受Gla-100治疗的患者相比,接受Gla-300治疗的患者停药可能性在T1DM患者中降低了83%,在T2DM患者中降低了44%(p<0.0001)。接受Gla-300治疗的T2DM患者急性住院事件的年发生率比接受Gla-100治疗的患者低12%(p<0.0001),但在T1DM患者中相似。总体费用比较显示,在第一年所有患者中,使用Gla-300相对于Gla-100有中度但具有统计学意义的差异,在T2DM患者中仅在3年随访期内有差异。
使用Gla-300导致更好的持续性,至少在T2DM中急性住院事件更少,并降低了医疗支出。这些现实生活中的结果证实了使用Gla-300而非Gla-100的潜在益处。