Tajdar Daniel, Lühmann Dagmar, Walther Laura, Bittner Lasse, Scherer Martin, Schäfer Ingmar
Institute and Outpatients Clinic of General Practice/Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Jun;15(6):1375-1388. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01574-x. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
Short-term studies reported improved glycemic control and a decrease in eHbA1c (estimated hemoglobin A1c) in patients with type 1 diabetes during COVID-19 lockdown, but long-term changes are unknown. Therefore, the main objectives are to (1) analyze whether laboratory-measured HbA1c changed during and after two lockdowns and (2) investigate potential variables influencing HbA1c change.
In this cohort study, 291 adults with type 1 diabetes were followed over 3 years including the prepandemic phase and two lockdowns. The data from medical records and validated questionnaires assessing health literacy (HLS-EU-Q16), diabetes self-management (DSMQ-R27), general self-efficacy (GSE), and social support (F-SOZU-K14) were used to analyze associations with HbA1c levels (N = 2370) by performing multivariable linear regressions.
The median age was 54 (38-63) years and 159 (54.6%) were male. All phases of the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with a significant increase in laboratory-measured HbA1c levels in percent (e.g., during first lockdown β = 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.39, p = 0.005; during the second lockdown, β = 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.38, p < 0.001). HbA1c change during lockdowns was significantly affected by the number of checkups (β = -0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.01, p = 0.010), the value of HbA1c at previous observation (β = 0.33, 95% CI 0.29-0.36, p < 0.001), educational level (secondary versus tertiary: β = 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.38, p = 0.008; primary versus tertiary: β = 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.52, p = 0.004), health literacy score (for each point: β = -0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to - 0.002, p = 0.034), and diabetes self-management score (for each point: β = -0.03, 95% CI -0.04 to -0.02, p < 0.001). The use of continuous glucose monitoring or insulin pump had no effect on HbA1c change.
Lockdowns can lead to worsening glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. Particularly patients with few check-ups, poor blood glucose values, deficits in diabetes self-management, low health literacy, and a low level of education seem to be at greater risk of worsening glycemic control during lockdowns and, therefore, require special medical care, e.g., through telemedicine.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04821921.
短期研究报告称,1型糖尿病患者在新冠疫情封锁期间血糖控制得到改善,估计糖化血红蛋白(eHbA1c)有所下降,但长期变化尚不清楚。因此,主要目标是:(1)分析两次封锁期间及之后实验室测量的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)是否发生变化;(2)调查影响HbA1c变化的潜在变量。
在这项队列研究中,对291名1型糖尿病成年患者进行了为期3年的随访,包括疫情前阶段和两次封锁期。利用病历数据以及评估健康素养(HLS-EU-Q16)、糖尿病自我管理(DSMQ-R27)、一般自我效能感(GSE)和社会支持(F-SOZU-K14)的有效问卷数据,通过多变量线性回归分析与HbA1c水平(N = 2370)的关联。
中位年龄为54(38 - 63)岁,男性159人(54.6%)。新冠疫情的所有阶段均与实验室测量的HbA1c水平百分比显著升高相关(例如,在第一次封锁期间β = 0.23,95%置信区间(CI)0.07 - 0.39,p = 0.005;在第二次封锁期间,β = 0.27,95% CI 0.15 - 0.38,p < 0.001)。封锁期间HbA1c的变化受到检查次数(β = -0.03,95% CI -0.05至 -0.01,p = 0.010)、上次观察时的HbA1c值(β = 0.33,95% CI 0.29 - 0.36,p < 0.001)、教育水平(中学与大学:β = 0.22,95% CI 0.06 - 0.38,p = 0.008;小学与大学:β = 0.31,95% CI 0.10 - 0.52,p = 0.004)、健康素养得分(每分:β = -0.03,95% CI -0.05至 -0.002,p = 0.034)和糖尿病自我管理得分(每分:β = -0.03,95% CI -0.04至 -0.02,p < 0.001)的显著影响。使用持续葡萄糖监测或胰岛素泵对HbA1c变化没有影响。
封锁可能导致1型糖尿病患者的血糖控制恶化。特别是检查次数少、血糖值差、糖尿病自我管理不足、健康素养低和教育水平低的患者,在封锁期间血糖控制恶化的风险似乎更大,因此需要特殊的医疗护理,例如通过远程医疗。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符,NCT04821921。