Worster Brooke, Zhu Yifan, Garber Gregory, Kieffer Sawyer, Smith-McLallen Aaron
Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Independence Blue Cross, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cancer. 2024 Apr 20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35332.
Supportive oncology (SO) care reduces symptom severity, admissions, and costs in patients with advanced cancer. This study examines the impact of SO care on utilization and costs.
Retrospective analysis of utilization and costs comparing patients enrolled in SO versus three comparison cohorts who did not receive SO. Using claims, the authors estimated differences in health care utilization and cost between the treatment group and comparison cohorts. The treatment group consisting of patients treated for cancer at an National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center who received SO between January 2018 and December 2019 were compared to an asynchronous cohort that received cancer care before January 2018 (n = 60), a contemporaneous cohort with palliative care receiving SO care from other providers in the Southeastern Pennsylvania region during the program period (n = 86), and a contemporaneous cohort without palliative care consisting of patients at other cancer centers who were eligible for but did not receive SO care (n = 393).
At 30, 60, and 90 days post-enrollment into SO, the treatment group had between 27% and 70% fewer inpatient admissions and between 16% and 54% fewer emergency department visits (p < .05) compared to non-SO cohorts. At 90 days following enrollment in SO care, total medical costs were between 4.4% and 24.5% lower for the treatment group across all comparisons (p < .05).
SO is associated with reduced admissions, emergency department visits, and total costs in advanced cancer patients. Developing innovative reimbursement models could be a cost-effective approach to improve care of patients with advanced cancer.
支持性肿瘤学(SO)护理可降低晚期癌症患者的症状严重程度、住院率和成本。本研究探讨了SO护理对医疗资源利用和成本的影响。
对接受SO护理的患者与三个未接受SO护理的对照队列进行回顾性分析,比较其医疗资源利用和成本情况。作者利用索赔数据估计了治疗组与对照队列之间医疗保健利用和成本的差异。将2018年1月至2019年12月在一家美国国立癌症研究所指定的癌症中心接受癌症治疗并接受SO护理的患者组成的治疗组,与2018年1月之前接受癌症护理的异步队列(n = 60)、在项目期间从宾夕法尼亚州东南部地区其他提供者处接受姑息治疗和SO护理的同期队列(n = 86),以及由其他癌症中心符合条件但未接受SO护理的患者组成的无姑息治疗同期队列(n = 393)进行比较。
与未接受SO护理的队列相比,在接受SO护理后30、60和90天,治疗组的住院人数减少了27%至70%,急诊就诊次数减少了16%至54%(p < 0.05)。在接受SO护理90天后,所有比较中治疗组的总医疗成本降低了4.4%至24.5%(p < 0.05)。
SO护理与晚期癌症患者住院人数、急诊就诊次数和总成本的降低相关。开发创新的报销模式可能是改善晚期癌症患者护理的一种具有成本效益的方法。