• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合方法评价大容量低复杂度手术中心项目(MEASURE):一项混合方法研究方案。

Mixed Methods EvAluation of the high-volume low-complexity Surgical hUb pRogrammE (MEASURE): a mixed methods study protocol.

机构信息

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 19;14(4):e086338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086338.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086338
PMID:38643003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11033628/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The waiting list for elective surgery in England recently reached over 7.8 million people and waiting time targets have been missed since 2010. The high-volume low complexity (HVLC) surgical hubs programme aims to tackle the backlog of patients awaiting elective surgery treatment in England. This study will evaluate the impact of HVLC surgical hubs on productivity, patient care and the workforce.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This 4-year project consists of six interlinked work packages (WPs) and is informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. : Mapping current and future HVLC provision in England through document analysis, quantitative data sets (eg, Hospital Episodes Statistics) and interviews with national service leaders. : Exploring the effects of HVLC hubs on key performance outcomes, primarily the volume of low-complexity patients treated, using quasi-experimental methods. : Exploring the impact and implementation of HVLC hubs on patients, health professionals and the local NHS through approximately nine longitudinal, multimethod qualitative case studies. : Assessing the productivity of HVLC surgical hubs using the Centre for Health Economics NHS productivity measure and Lord Carter's operational productivity measure. : Conducting a mixed-methods appraisal will assess the influence of HVLC surgical hubs on the workforce using: qualitative data (WP3) and quantitative data (eg, National Health Service (NHS) England's workforce statistics and intelligence from WP2). : Analysing the costs and consequences of HVLC surgical hubs will assess their achievements in relation to their resource use to establish value for money. A patient and public involvement group will contribute to the study design and materials.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the East Midlands-Nottingham Research Ethics Committee 23/EM/0231. Participants will provide informed consent for qualitative study components. Dissemination plans include multiple academic and non-academic outputs (eg, Peer-reviewed journals, conferences, social media) and a continuous, feedback-loop of findings to key stakeholders (eg, NHS England) to influence policy development.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Research registry: Researchregistry9364 (https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry%23home/registrationdetails/64cb6c795cbef8002a46f115/).

摘要

简介

英国的择期手术等候名单最近已超过 780 万人,自 2010 年以来,等候时间目标一直未达到。高容量低复杂度(HVLC)手术中心计划旨在解决英国等待择期手术治疗的患者积压问题。本研究将评估 HVLC 手术中心对生产力、患者护理和劳动力的影响。

方法和分析

该 4 年项目由六个相互关联的工作包(WP)组成,并以综合实施研究框架为依据:通过文件分析、定量数据集(如医院住院统计数据)和对国家服务领导者的访谈,了解英国当前和未来 HVLC 的供应情况。使用准实验方法探索 HVLC 中心对关键绩效结果的影响,主要是治疗低复杂度患者的数量。通过大约九项纵向、多方法定性案例研究,探索 HVLC 中心对患者、卫生专业人员和当地国民保健制度的影响和实施情况。使用卫生经济学 NHS 生产力衡量标准和 Lord Carter 的运营生产力衡量标准评估 HVLC 手术中心的生产力。使用混合方法评估将使用:定性数据(WP3)和定量数据(例如,国民保健服务(NHS)英格兰的劳动力统计数据和 WP2 的情报)评估 HVLC 手术中心对劳动力的影响。分析 HVLC 手术中心的成本和后果,以评估其在资源利用方面的成就,以确定物有所值。一个患者和公众参与小组将为研究设计和材料做出贡献。

伦理和传播

该研究已获得东米德兰兹-诺丁汉研究伦理委员会 23/EM/0231 的批准。参与者将对定性研究部分提供知情同意。传播计划包括多种学术和非学术产出(例如,同行评议期刊、会议、社交媒体)以及向主要利益相关者(例如,NHS 英格兰)持续反馈研究结果,以影响政策制定。

试验注册

研究注册:Researchregistry9364(https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry%23home/registrationdetails/64cb6c795cbef8002a46f115/)。

相似文献

1
Mixed Methods EvAluation of the high-volume low-complexity Surgical hUb pRogrammE (MEASURE): a mixed methods study protocol.混合方法评价大容量低复杂度手术中心项目(MEASURE):一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 19;14(4):e086338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086338.
2
Women's Health Hubs: a rapid mixed-methods evaluation.妇女健康中心:快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(30):1-138. doi: 10.3310/JYFT5036.
3
The SIMCA Study Protocol: Factors influencing the implementation of the Midwifery Continuity of Carer (MCoC) model of care in NHS maternity care in England: A mixed methods cross case analysis involving clinicians, women and policy makers.SIMCA研究方案:影响英格兰国民保健服务体系产科护理中助产士连续性照护(MCoC)模式实施的因素:一项涉及临床医生、产妇和政策制定者的混合方法跨案例分析
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 24;5:4. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13745.1. eCollection 2025.
4
Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol.英格兰使用患者体验数据改善住院精神卫生保健质量的实效评价(EURIPIDES):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e021013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021013.
5
Exploring the views of female genital mutilation survivors, their male partners and healthcare professionals on the timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS FGM care provision (the FGM Sister Study): protocol for a qualitative study.探索女性生殖器切割幸存者、其男性伴侣及医疗保健专业人员对阴蒂切开术手术时机及英国国家医疗服务体系女性生殖器切割护理服务的看法(女性生殖器切割姐妹研究):一项定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 17;9(10):e034140. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034140.
6
Qualitative study exploring the design of a patient-reported symptom-based risk stratification system for suspected head and neck cancer referrals: protocol for work packages 1 and 2 within the EVEREST-HN programme.探索基于患者报告症状的疑似头颈部癌症转诊风险分层系统设计的定性研究: EVEREST-HN 项目工作包 1 和 2 的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 5;14(4):e081151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081151.
7
The Resilience Hub approach for addressing mental health of health and social care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间卫生和社会保健工作者心理健康问题的韧性中心方法:一项混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(29):1-164. doi: 10.3310/HGQR5133.
8
General practitioners and emergency departments (GPED)-efficient models of care: a mixed-methods study protocol.全科医生与急诊科(GPED)——高效护理模式:一项混合方法研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 3;8(10):e024012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024012.
9
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

本文引用的文献

1
Do general practitioners working in or alongside the emergency department improve clinical outcomes or experience? A mixed-methods study.在急诊部门或其附近工作的全科医生是否能改善临床结果或体验?一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e063495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063495.
2
Mixed methods evaluation of the Getting it Right First Time programme in elective orthopaedic surgery in England: an analysis from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics.英国择期矫形外科“首次就做正确”项目的混合方法评估:来自国家关节登记处和医院入院统计数据的分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 16;12(6):e058316. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058316.
3
The delivery plan for tackling the covid-19 backlog of elective care falls short.
应对新冠疫情导致的择期护理积压问题的交付计划存在不足。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 19;377:o995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o995.
4
Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum.概念化与实施研究整合框架(CFIR)一起使用的结果:CFIR 结果附录。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 22;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5.
5
How to analyse longitudinal data from multiple sources in qualitative health research: the pen portrait analytic technique.如何在定性健康研究中分析来自多个来源的纵向数据:肖像分析技术。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Aug 2;19(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0810-0.
6
Applying an Implementation Framework to the Use of Evidence from Economic Evaluations in Making Healthcare Decisions.将实施框架应用于医疗保健决策中使用经济评估证据。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Aug;17(4):533-543. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00477-4.
7
The Economic Consequences of Hospital Admissions.住院治疗的经济后果。
Am Econ Rev. 2018 Feb;102(2):308-352. doi: 10.1257/aer.20161038.
8
A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.实施研究综合框架应用的系统评价
Implement Sci. 2016 May 17;11:72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z.
9
Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT).外科手术结果风险工具(SORT)的开发与验证
Br J Surg. 2014 Dec;101(13):1774-83. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9638.
10
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.利用自然实验评估人群健康干预措施:英国医学研究理事会新指南。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1182-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375. Epub 2012 May 10.