Horsman Graeme
Cranfield University, Bedford, UK.
J Forensic Sci. 2024 Jul;69(4):1456-1466. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15524. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
Ground truth data (GTD) is used by those in the field of digital forensics (DF) for a variety of purposes including to evaluate the functionality of undocumented, new, or emerging technology and services and the digital traces left behind following their usage. Most accepted and reliable trace interpretations must be derived from an examination of relevant GTD, yet despite the importance of it to the DF community, there is little formal guidance available for supporting those who create it, to do so in a way that ensures any data is of good quality, reliable, and therefore usable. In an attempt to address this issue, this work proposes a minimum standard of documentation that must accompany the production of any GTD, particularly when it is intended for use in the process of discovering new knowledge, proposing original interpretations of a digital trace, or determining the functionality of any technology or service. A template structure is discussed and provided in Appendix S1 which sets out a minimum standard for metadata describing any GTD's production process and content. It is suggested that such an approach can support the maintenance of trust in any GTD and improve the shareability of it.
数字取证(DF)领域的人员将真实数据(GTD)用于多种目的,包括评估未记录的、新的或新兴技术及服务的功能,以及其使用后留下的数字痕迹。大多数被认可且可靠的痕迹解读必须源自对相关GTD的检查,然而,尽管GTD对数字取证社区很重要,但对于支持创建GTD的人员,却几乎没有正式的指导,以确保所创建的数据质量良好、可靠且可用。为解决这一问题,本文提出了任何GTD产生时必须附带的最低文档标准,特别是当它旨在用于发现新知识、对数字痕迹提出原始解读或确定任何技术或服务的功能时。附录S1中讨论并提供了一个模板结构,该结构规定了描述任何GTD生产过程和内容的元数据的最低标准。建议这种方法可以支持对任何GTD的信任维护,并提高其可共享性。