• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于在数字取证中创建和共享基础真值数据的模板。

A template for creating and sharing ground truth data in digital forensics.

作者信息

Horsman Graeme

机构信息

Cranfield University, Bedford, UK.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2024 Jul;69(4):1456-1466. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15524. Epub 2024 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.15524
PMID:38643370
Abstract

Ground truth data (GTD) is used by those in the field of digital forensics (DF) for a variety of purposes including to evaluate the functionality of undocumented, new, or emerging technology and services and the digital traces left behind following their usage. Most accepted and reliable trace interpretations must be derived from an examination of relevant GTD, yet despite the importance of it to the DF community, there is little formal guidance available for supporting those who create it, to do so in a way that ensures any data is of good quality, reliable, and therefore usable. In an attempt to address this issue, this work proposes a minimum standard of documentation that must accompany the production of any GTD, particularly when it is intended for use in the process of discovering new knowledge, proposing original interpretations of a digital trace, or determining the functionality of any technology or service. A template structure is discussed and provided in Appendix S1 which sets out a minimum standard for metadata describing any GTD's production process and content. It is suggested that such an approach can support the maintenance of trust in any GTD and improve the shareability of it.

摘要

数字取证(DF)领域的人员将真实数据(GTD)用于多种目的,包括评估未记录的、新的或新兴技术及服务的功能,以及其使用后留下的数字痕迹。大多数被认可且可靠的痕迹解读必须源自对相关GTD的检查,然而,尽管GTD对数字取证社区很重要,但对于支持创建GTD的人员,却几乎没有正式的指导,以确保所创建的数据质量良好、可靠且可用。为解决这一问题,本文提出了任何GTD产生时必须附带的最低文档标准,特别是当它旨在用于发现新知识、对数字痕迹提出原始解读或确定任何技术或服务的功能时。附录S1中讨论并提供了一个模板结构,该结构规定了描述任何GTD生产过程和内容的元数据的最低标准。建议这种方法可以支持对任何GTD的信任维护,并提高其可共享性。

相似文献

1
A template for creating and sharing ground truth data in digital forensics.一种用于在数字取证中创建和共享基础真值数据的模板。
J Forensic Sci. 2024 Jul;69(4):1456-1466. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15524. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
2
Interpreting digital traces:- 8 foundational pillars to support the formation of opinion in digital forensics.解读数字痕迹:支持数字取证中形成观点的8个基础支柱。
Sci Justice. 2024 Jan;64(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2023.11.007. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Digital forensics: an analytical crime scene procedure model (ACSPM).数字取证:一种分析性犯罪现场程序模型 (ACSPM)。
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Dec 10;233(1-3):244-56. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
4
A case study on anonymised sharing platforms and digital traces left by their usage.匿名共享平台及其使用所留下的数字痕迹案例研究。
Sci Justice. 2021 Jan;61(1):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
5
Dataset construction challenges for digital forensics.数字取证中的数据集构建挑战。
Forensic Sci Int Digit Investig. 2021 Sep;38. doi: 10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301264. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
6
Geospatial resources for supporting data standards, guidance and best practice in health informatics.支持健康信息学数据标准、指南和最佳实践的地理空间资源。
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Jan 26;4:19. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-19.
7
Digital Forensics Experimentation: Analysis and Recommendations.数字取证实验:分析与建议。
Forensic Sci Rev. 2022 Jan;34(1):21-41.
8
The different types of reports produced in digital forensic investigations.数字取证调查中生成的不同类型的报告。
Sci Justice. 2021 Sep;61(5):627-634. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
When finding nothing may be evidence of something: Anti-forensics and digital tool marks.当一无所获可能成为某种证据时:反取证与数字工具痕迹
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):565-572. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 3.