Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Fetal Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Prenat Diagn. 2024 Jun;44(6-7):832-845. doi: 10.1002/pd.6575. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
This systematic review explores cardiac adaptation in monochorionic (MC) twins with twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) or selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) and assesses the risk of congenital heart defects (CHDs).
Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, 63 studies were reviewed (49 on cardiac adaptation, 13 on CHD, one on both). A narrative synthesis of cardiac adaptation patterns was performed. Additionally, a meta-analysis compared the livebirth prevalence of CHD in TTTS and sFGR against uncomplicated MC twins.
In TTTS recipients, cardiac function may be impaired for diastolic, systolic, as well as global functions, while in donors, cardiac function is generally preserved. In sFGR, large twins may show hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and small twins may show impaired systolic function. Co-occurrence of TTTS and sFGR magnifies cardiac impact but is often underreported. Meta-analysis for CHD prevalence revealed a relative risk ratio of 3.5 (95% CI: 2.5-4.9) for TTTS and 2.2 (95%CI: 1.3-3.5) for sFGR compared with uncomplicated MC twins.
This study highlights the well-documented cardiac adaptation in TTTS, contrasting with limited understanding in sFGR. Elevated CHD risks were observed in both conditions. Enhanced cardiovascular surveillance is warranted in complicated MC twin pregnancies. Future research should explore cardiac adaptation in sFGR and its long-term consequences.
本系统评价探讨了患有双胎输血综合征(TTTS)或选择性胎儿生长受限(sFGR)的单绒毛膜(MC)双胎的心脏适应性,并评估了先天性心脏缺陷(CHD)的风险。
根据 PRISMA 指南,共回顾了 63 项研究(49 项关于心脏适应性,13 项关于 CHD,1 项关于两者)。对心脏适应性模式进行了叙述性综合分析。此外,还进行了荟萃分析,比较了 TTTS 和 sFGR 与单纯 MC 双胎活产儿 CHD 的患病率。
在 TTTS 受者中,舒张期、收缩期和整体功能的心脏功能可能受损,而在供者中,心脏功能通常得到保留。在 sFGR 中,大型双胞胎可能出现肥厚型心肌病,而小型双胞胎可能出现收缩功能受损。TTTS 和 sFGR 的同时发生放大了心脏的影响,但往往报告不足。CHD 患病率的荟萃分析显示,与单纯 MC 双胎相比,TTTS 的相对风险比为 3.5(95%CI:2.5-4.9),sFGR 的相对风险比为 2.2(95%CI:1.3-3.5)。
本研究强调了 TTTS 中已有充分文献记载的心脏适应性,而对 sFGR 的理解有限。在这两种情况下都观察到 CHD 风险增加。在复杂的 MC 双胎妊娠中需要加强心血管监测。未来的研究应探讨 sFGR 中的心脏适应性及其长期后果。