Vonk Lisanne, Eekhout Iris, Huijts Tim, Levels Mark, Jansen Maria W J
Academic Collaborative Center for Public Health Limburg, Public Health Service South Limburg, 6400 AA, Heerlen, P.O. Box 33, the Netherlands.
Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, the Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):1098. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18546-2.
Worldwide, recommendations for fruit and vegetable consumption are not met, which can cause chronic diseases. Especially adolescence is an important phase for the development of health behaviours. Therefore, in the Netherlands, the Healthy School program was established to aid schools in promoting healthy lifestyles among their students. We examined to what extent the variation between secondary schools regarding students' fruit and vegetable consumption could be explained by differences between schools regarding Healthy School certification, general school characteristics, and the school population. Additionally, we examined whether Healthy School certification was related to the outcomes, and whether the association differed for subgroups.
We performed a repeated cross-sectional multilevel study. We used data from multiple school years from the national Youth Health Monitor on secondary schools (grades 2 and 4, age ranged from approximately 12 to 18 years) of seven Public Health Services, and added data with regard to Healthy School certification, general school characteristics and school population characteristics. We included two outcomes: the number of days a student consumed fruit and vegetables per week. In total, we analysed data on 168,127 students from 256 secondary schools in the Netherlands.
Results indicated that 2.87% of the variation in fruit consumption and 5.57% of the variation in vegetable consumption could be attributed to differences at the school-level. Characteristics related to high parental educational attainment, household income, and educational track of the students explained most of the variance between schools. Additionally, we found a small favourable association between Healthy School certification and the number of days secondary school students consumed fruit and vegetables.
School population characteristics explained more variation between schools than Healthy School certification and general school characteristics, especially indicators of parental socioeconomic status. Nevertheless, Healthy School certification seemed to be slightly related to fruit and vegetable consumption, and might contribute to healthier dietary intake. We found small differences for some subgroups, but future research should focus on the impact in different school contexts, since we were restricted in the characteristics that could be included in this study.
在全球范围内,水果和蔬菜的摄入量未达到推荐标准,这可能引发慢性病。尤其是青春期是健康行为养成的重要阶段。因此,荷兰设立了“健康学校”项目,以协助学校促进学生养成健康的生活方式。我们研究了中学之间在学生水果和蔬菜摄入量方面的差异,在多大程度上可由学校在健康学校认证、学校总体特征以及学校学生群体方面的差异来解释。此外,我们还研究了健康学校认证是否与结果相关,以及该关联在不同亚组中是否存在差异。
我们开展了一项重复横断面多层次研究。我们使用了来自七个公共卫生服务机构的全国青少年健康监测中多个学年的中学(二年级和四年级,年龄约为12至18岁)数据,并补充了有关健康学校认证、学校总体特征和学校学生群体特征的数据。我们纳入了两个结果指标:学生每周食用水果和蔬菜的天数。我们总共分析了荷兰256所中学的168,127名学生的数据。
结果表明,水果摄入量差异的2.87%和蔬菜摄入量差异的5.57%可归因于学校层面的差异。与高父母教育程度、家庭收入以及学生教育路径相关的特征解释了学校之间的大部分差异。此外,我们发现健康学校认证与中学生食用水果和蔬菜的天数之间存在微弱的正向关联。
学校学生群体特征比健康学校认证和学校总体特征更能解释学校之间的差异,尤其是父母社会经济地位指标。然而,健康学校认证似乎与水果和蔬菜摄入量略有关联,可能有助于更健康的饮食摄入。我们发现某些亚组存在细微差异,但由于本研究可纳入的特征有限,未来研究应关注在不同学校环境中的影响。