Smrčka Aleš, Sangchoolie Behrooz, Mingozzi Emanuele, de la Vara Jose Luis, Farrell Marie, Barbosa Raul, Baglum Cem, Yayan Ugur, Ergun Salih, Kanak Alper
Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Borås, Sweden.
Open Res Eur. 2023 Dec 28;3:219. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16234.1. eCollection 2023.
Verification and validation (V&V) are complex processes combining different approaches and incorporating many different methods including many activities. System engineers regularly face the question if their V&V activities lead to better products, and having appropriate criteria at hand for evaluation of safety and cybersecurity of the systems would help to answer such a question. Additionally, when there is a demand to improve the quality of an already managed V&V process, there is a struggle over what criteria to use in order to measure the improvement. This paper presents an extensive set of criteria suitable for safety and cybersecurity evaluation of cyberphysical systems. The evaluation criteria are agreed upon by 60 researchers from 32 academic and industrial organizations jointly working in a large-scale European research project on 13 real-world use cases from the domains of automotive, railway, aerospace, agriculture, healthcare, and industrial robotics.
验证与确认(V&V)是复杂的过程,它结合了不同的方法并纳入了许多不同的手段,包括众多活动。系统工程师经常面临这样的问题:他们的V&V活动是否能带来更好的产品,而手头拥有用于评估系统安全性和网络安全性的适当标准将有助于回答这个问题。此外,当需要提高已管理的V&V过程的质量时,在使用何种标准来衡量改进方面存在争议。本文提出了一套广泛适用于网络物理系统安全性和网络安全性评估的标准。这些评估标准是由来自32个学术和工业组织的60名研究人员共同商定的,他们在一个大规模的欧洲研究项目中,针对汽车、铁路、航空航天、农业、医疗保健和工业机器人等领域的13个实际用例开展合作。