Clinicians risk becoming 'liability sinks' for artificial intelligence.

作者信息

Lawton Tom, Morgan Phillip, Porter Zoe, Hickey Shireen, Cunningham Alice, Hughes Nathan, Iacovides Ioanna, Jia Yan, Sharma Vishal, Habli Ibrahim

机构信息

Improvement Academy, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK.

Assuring Autonomy International Programme, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

Future Healthc J. 2024 Feb 19;11(1):100007. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100007. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100007

PMID:38646041

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11025047/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b23/11025047/527e3c137f42/gr1.jpg

相似文献

[1]

Clinicians risk becoming 'liability sinks' for artificial intelligence.

Future Healthc J. 2024-2-19

[2]

When Artificial Intelligence Models Surpass Physician Performance: Medical Malpractice Liability in an Era of Advanced Artificial Intelligence.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2022-7

[3]

Importance of Melt Flow Direction during Injection Molding on Polymer Heat Sinks' Cooling Efficiency.

Polymers (Basel). 2021-4-7

[4]

Artificial intelligence and clinical decision support: clinicians' perspectives on trust, trustworthiness, and liability.

Med Law Rev. 2023-11-27

[5]

A survey of clinicians on the use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology, dermatology, radiology and radiation oncology.

Sci Rep. 2021-3-4

[6]

In support of "no-fault" civil liability rules for artificial intelligence.

SN Soc Sci. 2021

[7]

Climate change. Panel estimates possible carbon 'sinks'.

Science. 2000-5-12

[8]

Legal and ethical considerations of artificial intelligence in skin cancer diagnosis.

Australas J Dermatol. 2022-2

[9]

Defining medical liability when artificial intelligence is applied on diagnostic algorithms: a systematic review.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023-11-27

[10]

Liability Exposure of Clinicians in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Healthcare.

Biomed Instrum Technol. 2024

引用本文的文献

[1]

The revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence in orthopedics: comprehensive review of current benefits and challenges.

J Robot Surg. 2025-8-25

[2]

Usability and adoption in a randomized trial of GutGPT a GenAI tool for gastrointestinal bleeding.

NPJ Digit Med. 2025-8-18

[3]

Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations.

Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2025-5-10

[4]

Patient Reactions to Artificial Intelligence-Clinician Discrepancies: Web-Based Randomized Experiment.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-5-22

[5]

Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review.

BMJ Open. 2025-4-15

[6]

Moving beyond the AI sales pitch - Empowering clinicians to ask the right questions about clinical AI.

Future Healthc J. 2024-9-19

[7]

How do we improve the resilience of our healthcare systems and staff ?

Future Healthc J. 2024-3-15

本文引用的文献

[1]

AI: Workload Reduction by Autonomous Reporting of Normal Chest Radiographs.

Radiology. 2023-5

[2]

Clinical decisions using AI must consider patient values.

Nat Med. 2022-2

[3]

Artificial intelligence explainability: the technical and ethical dimensions.

Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021-10-4

[4]

Artificial intelligence in health care: accountability and safety.

Bull World Health Organ. 2020-2-25

[5]

Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data.

JAMA Intern Med. 2018-11-1

[6]

Multidisciplinary in-hospital teams improve patient outcomes: A review.

Surg Neurol Int. 2014-8-28

[7]

Medical error, incident investigation and the second victim: doing better but feeling worse?

BMJ Qual Saf. 2012-4

[8]

Coping with medical error: a systematic review of papers to assess the effects of involvement in medical errors on healthcare professionals' psychological well-being.

Qual Saf Health Care. 2010-12

[9]

Residents' responses to medical error: coping, learning, and change.

Acad Med. 2006-1

[10]

A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation.

IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum. 2000-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

新学期，新优惠

Clinicians risk becoming 'liability sinks' for artificial intelligence.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

用中文搜PubMed

推荐工具

Suppr 超能文献