• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫重量对良性指征下机器人辅助子宫切除术手术结局的影响。

Effect of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy in Benign Indications.

作者信息

Higuchi Naofumi, Kanno Kiyoshi, Ochi Yoshifumi, Sawada Mari, Sakate Shintaro, Yanai Shiori, Andou Masaaki

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Kurashiki, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56602. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56602. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.56602
PMID:38646385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11031623/
Abstract

Background Uterine weight is an important factor in determining the complexity of a hysterectomy. Although greater uterine weight increases operative time and blood loss in open or laparoscopic surgery, it remains uncertain whether this applies to robot-assisted hysterectomy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of uterine weight on the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted hysterectomy. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 872 patients who underwent robot-assisted hysterectomies at our institution between January 2019 and June 2022. Of these, 724 cases were analyzed and classified into four groups based on uterine weight: <250 g (377 patients), 250-500 g (253 patients), 500-750 g (69 patients), and ≥750 g (25 patients). We performed univariate analysis with the following endpoints: operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, complication rate, conversion to laparotomy rate, and blood transfusion rate. Results Operating time and blood loss increased significantly with greater uterine weight in the four groups (both p-values <0.01), but postoperative hospital stay and complication rate did not increase (p = 0.448, p = 0.679, respectively). None of the patients underwent conversion to laparotomy or blood transfusion. Conclusion Although the operating time for robot-assisted hysterectomy and blood loss increased with greater uterine weight, the complications and length of postoperative hospital stay were similar between groups. Robot-assisted hysterectomy is safe in cases of much uterine weight.

摘要

背景

子宫重量是决定子宫切除术复杂性的一个重要因素。尽管在开腹或腹腔镜手术中,子宫重量越大手术时间越长、失血越多,但对于机器人辅助子宫切除术是否如此仍不确定。本研究旨在探讨子宫重量对机器人辅助子宫切除术手术结局的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2019年1月至2022年6月期间在我院接受机器人辅助子宫切除术的872例患者。其中,724例病例进行了分析,并根据子宫重量分为四组:<250 g(377例患者)、250 - 500 g(253例患者)、500 - 750 g(69例患者)和≥750 g(25例患者)。我们以以下指标进行单因素分析:手术时间、失血量、术后住院时间、并发症发生率、中转开腹率和输血率。

结果

四组中,随着子宫重量增加,手术时间和失血量显著增加(p值均<0.01),但术后住院时间和并发症发生率并未增加(分别为p = 0.448,p = 0.679)。无一例患者中转开腹或输血。

结论

尽管机器人辅助子宫切除术的手术时间和失血量随子宫重量增加而增加,但各组间并发症和术后住院时间相似。对于子宫重量较大的病例,机器人辅助子宫切除术是安全的。

相似文献

1
Effect of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy in Benign Indications.子宫重量对良性指征下机器人辅助子宫切除术手术结局的影响。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56602. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56602. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.机器人辅助与其他微创途径子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):650.e1-650.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
3
Safety and feasibility of the three-port robot-assisted hysterectomy across uterine weights.三孔机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗不同重量子宫的安全性和可行性。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):259-264. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01101-7. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Dallas UtErus Transplant Study: Early Outcomes and Complications of Robot-assisted Hysterectomy for Living Uterus Donors.达拉斯子宫移植研究:机器人辅助子宫切除术用于活体子宫供者的早期结果和并发症。
Transplantation. 2021 Jan 1;105(1):225-230. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003211.
5
Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgery in challenging hysterectomies - a single institutional experience.机器人辅助手术在困难子宫切除术的疗效和安全性:单机构经验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;26(4):1235-1240. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28115.
6
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
7
Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes.大小重要吗?子宫重量对机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术结局的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2011 Dec;5(4):267-72. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0271-x. Epub 2011 May 13.
8
A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.一项关于机器人辅助与开放手术子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性比较研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Feb;25(2):250-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000357.
9
Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.体重指数对机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
10
Pedagogic Approach in the Surgical Learning: The First Period of "Assistant Surgeon" May Improve the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy.外科学习中的教学方法:“助理外科医生”的第一阶段可能会改善腹腔镜机器人辅助子宫切除术的学习曲线。
Front Surg. 2016 Nov 2;3:58. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00058. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing approaches to benign hysterectomy using conventional multi-port and newer single-port robots: a propensity score matching analysis of surgical outcomes and literature review.比较使用传统多端口和新型单端口机器人进行良性子宫切除术的方法:手术结果的倾向评分匹配分析及文献综述。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 23;19(1):320. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02448-5.
2
Surgical outcomes of robotic hysterectomy for large uterus weighing more than 1000 g: a retrospective study from a high-volume center.子宫重量超过1000克的大型子宫机器人子宫切除术的手术结果:来自高容量中心的回顾性研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 31;19(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02422-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗大子宫的手术效果比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2415-2419. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01673-0. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgery in challenging hysterectomies - a single institutional experience.机器人辅助手术在困难子宫切除术的疗效和安全性:单机构经验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;26(4):1235-1240. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28115.
3
Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.经阴道微创手术治疗良性疾病-手术量很重要:一项比较机器人辅助腹腔镜和传统腹腔镜子宫切除术并发症的回顾性队列研究。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1199-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01340-2. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
4
Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术及患者预后:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2021 Aug 2;13(8):e16828. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16828. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
Assessment of surgeon and hospital volume for robot-assisted and laparoscopic benign hysterectomy in Sweden.瑞典机器人辅助和腹腔镜良性子宫切除术的外科医生和医院量评估。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Sep;100(9):1730-1739. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14166. Epub 2021 May 26.
6
Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?良性指征的机器人子宫切除术:十年间我们学到了什么?
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00091.
7
Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫切除术阴道边缘裂开的发生率和预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):710-720. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
8
Safety and feasibility of the three-port robot-assisted hysterectomy across uterine weights.三孔机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗不同重量子宫的安全性和可行性。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):259-264. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01101-7. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
Impact of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy: Analysis of 500 cases in a single institute.子宫重量对机器人辅助子宫切除术的影响:单中心 500 例分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Oct;15(5):e2026. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2026. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
10
Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus.大型子宫机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00068.