• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫重量超过1000克的大型子宫机器人子宫切除术的手术结果:来自高容量中心的回顾性研究

Surgical outcomes of robotic hysterectomy for large uterus weighing more than 1000 g: a retrospective study from a high-volume center.

作者信息

Zhao Luyang, Xie Xiufeng, Zhang Nina, Xu Jia, Yang Wen, Fan Wensheng, Meng Yuanguang, Li Li'an, Gu Chenglei

机构信息

Senior Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Seventh Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, No.5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 May 31;19(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02422-1.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02422-1
PMID:40450117
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12126347/
Abstract

Performing robotic hysterectomy (RH) on large uteri is a significant challenge. This study aims to investigate the impact of various risk factors on surgical outcomes and to identify the most effective surgical approach for performing RH on uteri weighing over 1000 g in benign conditions. Uterine types were categorized as Type A and Type B based on the site of prominent lesions. Adhesions were re-assessed using the modified American Fertility Society score. During the study period, a total of 86 patients were included in the analysis. The average age of the population was 47.1 ± 4.5 years, and the median uterine weight was 1274 (ranges 1010-2250)g. Thirty-three (38.4%) cases were divided into Type A, while 53 (61.6%) cases were divided into Type B. The median duration of the operation was 160 (75-390) minutes, correlating significantly with increasing uterine weight (P = 0.005) and adhesion severity (P = 0.028). The median estimated blood loss was 150 (20-2000)ml, with significant differences observed between the groups based on uterine type (P = 0.049). A small percentage of patients (4.7%) required conversion to open surgery, which is also correlated significantly with uterine type (P = 0.019). Notably, uterine lesion type was identified as the sole independent predictor for total surgical complications (OR = 3.370, 95% CI 1.196-9.499; P = 0.022). In conclusion, RH is a viable and safe option for treating large uteri weighing more than 1000 g. Surgeons may consider the uterine type when determining the most suitable surgical method, as this can impact the conversion rate and overall surgical complications.

摘要

对大子宫实施机器人辅助子宫切除术(RH)是一项重大挑战。本研究旨在调查各种风险因素对手术结果的影响,并确定在良性情况下对重量超过1000克的子宫进行RH的最有效手术方法。根据突出病变部位将子宫类型分为A型和B型。采用改良的美国生育协会评分重新评估粘连情况。在研究期间,共有86例患者纳入分析。人群的平均年龄为47.1±4.5岁,子宫重量中位数为1274(范围1010 - 2250)克。33例(38.4%)病例分为A型,53例(61.6%)病例分为B型。手术时间中位数为160(75 - 390)分钟,与子宫重量增加(P = 0.005)和粘连严重程度(P = 0.028)显著相关。估计失血量中位数为150(20 - 2000)毫升,基于子宫类型的组间差异显著(P = 0.049)。一小部分患者(4.7%)需要转为开腹手术,这也与子宫类型显著相关(P = 0.019)。值得注意的是,子宫病变类型被确定为总体手术并发症的唯一独立预测因素(OR = 3.370,95% CI 1.196 - 9.499;P = 0.022)。总之,RH是治疗重量超过1000克大子宫的可行且安全的选择。外科医生在确定最合适的手术方法时可考虑子宫类型,因为这会影响转化率和总体手术并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aae/12126347/cd1d2567056a/11701_2025_2422_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aae/12126347/1fc9ab3ed153/11701_2025_2422_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aae/12126347/cd1d2567056a/11701_2025_2422_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aae/12126347/1fc9ab3ed153/11701_2025_2422_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aae/12126347/cd1d2567056a/11701_2025_2422_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical outcomes of robotic hysterectomy for large uterus weighing more than 1000 g: a retrospective study from a high-volume center.子宫重量超过1000克的大型子宫机器人子宫切除术的手术结果:来自高容量中心的回顾性研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 31;19(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02422-1.
2
Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.不同子宫重量下机器人辅助子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的成本及手术结果比较
J Robot Surg. 2017 Dec;11(4):433-439. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0674-4. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Impact of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy: Analysis of 500 cases in a single institute.子宫重量对机器人辅助子宫切除术的影响:单中心 500 例分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Oct;15(5):e2026. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2026. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
4
Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.机器人辅助与经腹子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫
JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):400-6. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521755.
5
Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.机器人辅助腹腔镜下子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术治疗子宫重量超过250克患者的围手术期结局
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):641-645. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
6
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术治疗 >1kg 良性子宫疾病的比较:258 例回顾性分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
7
Comparison of robotic and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy for large uterus using da Vinci Xi system: A propensity score matching analysis.使用达芬奇Xi系统对大子宫进行机器人辅助与传统单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Apr;307:252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.036. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
8
Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgery in challenging hysterectomies - a single institutional experience.机器人辅助手术在困难子宫切除术的疗效和安全性:单机构经验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;26(4):1235-1240. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28115.
9
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
vNOTES hysterectomy for patients with large uteri: Initial experience in the largest Tertiary Centre in Singapore.针对子宫较大患者的经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术:新加坡最大三级医疗中心的初步经验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Jun;310:113952. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.113952. Epub 2025 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy in Benign Indications.子宫重量对良性指征下机器人辅助子宫切除术手术结局的影响。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56602. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56602. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗大子宫的手术效果比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2415-2419. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01673-0. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Nationwide Estimates of Annual Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomies Performed in the United States.
美国全国范围内每年进行的住院和门诊子宫切除术的估计数。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar 1;139(3):446-448. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004679.
4
Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术及患者预后:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2021 Aug 2;13(8):e16828. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16828. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
[Hysterectomy: Practices evolution between 2009 and 2019 in France].[子宫切除术:2009年至2019年法国的手术演变情况]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Nov;49(11):816-822. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
6
Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?良性指征的机器人子宫切除术:十年间我们学到了什么?
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00091.
7
The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis.恩齐安分类法:一种全面的非侵入性和手术性子宫内膜异位症描述系统。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jul;100(7):1165-1175. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14099. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
8
Safety and feasibility of the three-port robot-assisted hysterectomy across uterine weights.三孔机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗不同重量子宫的安全性和可行性。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):259-264. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01101-7. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
Impact of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy: Analysis of 500 cases in a single institute.子宫重量对机器人辅助子宫切除术的影响:单中心 500 例分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Oct;15(5):e2026. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2026. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
10
Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus.大型子宫机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00068.