Kabiri Doron, Paltiel Ora, Ofek-Shlomai Noa, Nir-Paz Ran, Sompolinsky Yishai, Ezra Yossef
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Hebrew Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 5;11:1368998. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1368998. eCollection 2024.
Membrane stripping in group B streptococcus (GBS) carriers poses an increased risk of inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis, potentially due to accelerated labor, thereby potentially impacting the management of GBS colonization during delivery. We compared the adequacy of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis between pregnant women colonized with GBS, who underwent membrane stripping and those who did not. The study aimed to determine whether the performance of membrane stripping, by potentially shortening labor duration, increases the risk of inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis dispensation.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on GBS screen-positive women with a full-term singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, who were eligible for vaginal delivery. The exposed group consisted of women who underwent membrane stripping, while the unexposed group consisted of women who did not undergo membrane stripping. The primary outcome was defined as inadequate duration of antibiotic prophylaxis during labor, wherein less than 4 h of beta-lactam antibiotics were administered prior to delivery. Neonatal outcome was compared between the groups.
This retrospective cohort study comprised 1,609 women, with 129 in the exposed group (stripping group) and 1,480 in the unexposed group (no stripping group). Adequate intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis was received by 64.3% (83/129) of the exposed group, compared to 46.9% (694/1,480) of the unexposed group ( = 0.003). Membrane stripping was associated with increased odds of receiving adequate prophylaxis (OR 1.897, 95% CI 1.185-3.037, = 0.008). After excluding women who presented to the labor ward in active labor and delivered in less than 4 h, both the exposed and unexposed groups had similarly high rates of adequate intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (87.5% vs. 85.8%, respectively). No significant difference was observed in adverse neonatal outcomes between the groups.
The provision of membrane stripping did not impede adequate intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis and was correlated with a higher rate of sufficient prophylaxis in comparison to non-swept patients. These observations suggest that membrane stripping can be considered a safe option for ensuring adequate antibiotic prophylaxis in women colonized with GBS.
B族链球菌(GBS)携带者进行胎膜剥脱术会增加抗生素预防不足的风险,这可能是由于产程加速所致,从而可能影响分娩期间GBS定植的处理。我们比较了接受胎膜剥脱术和未接受胎膜剥脱术的GBS定植孕妇产时抗生素预防的充分性。该研究旨在确定胎膜剥脱术通过潜在地缩短产程,是否会增加抗生素预防给药不足的风险。
对符合阴道分娩条件、GBS筛查呈阳性、单胎足月妊娠且头先露的女性进行了一项回顾性队列研究。暴露组由接受胎膜剥脱术的女性组成,未暴露组由未接受胎膜剥脱术的女性组成。主要结局定义为产时抗生素预防时间不足,即分娩前β-内酰胺类抗生素给药时间少于4小时。比较两组的新生儿结局。
这项回顾性队列研究包括1609名女性,其中暴露组(剥脱组)129名,未暴露组(未剥脱组)1480名。暴露组64.3%(83/129)的孕妇接受了充分的产时抗生素预防,未暴露组为46.9%(694/1480)(P = 0.003)。胎膜剥脱术与接受充分预防的几率增加相关(比值比1.897,95%可信区间1.185 - 3.037,P = 0.008)。排除进入产程活跃期并在4小时内分娩的女性后,暴露组和未暴露组产时抗生素预防充分率同样很高(分别为87.5%和85.8%)。两组间新生儿不良结局无显著差异。
胎膜剥脱术并不妨碍充分的产时抗生素预防,与未进行胎膜剥脱的患者相比,其充分预防率更高。这些观察结果表明,对于GBS定植的女性,胎膜剥脱术可被视为确保充分抗生素预防的一种安全选择。