Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
School of Geographical Science, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Mar 18;35(3):695-704. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202403.012.
To understand the effects of different stover mulching amounts in no-tillage on soil carbon and nitrogen contents and enzyme activities, finding a stover mulching amount which can meet the requirement of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation while maximizing economic benefits, we conducted a long-term conservation tillage field experiment since 2007 in Mollisols area of Northeast China. We analyzed soil carbon and nitrogen contents, enzyme activities and economic benefits under conventional tillage (Control, CT), no-tillage without stover mulching (NT), no-tillage with 33% stover mulching (NT), no-tillage with 67% stover mulching (NT), and no-tillage with 100% stover mulching (NT) before planting in May 2020. The results showed that compared with CT, NT did not affect soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) contents, but increased soil organic carbon recalcitrance and decreased the availability of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and ammonium nitrogen. Compared with NT, no-tillage with stover mulching significantly increased SOC contents in 0-10 cm layer and increased with the amounts of stover. In addition, NT and NT significantly increased SOC stocks, facilitating the accumulation of soil organic matter. The effects of different stover mulching amounts on soil nitrogen content in 0-10 cm layer were different. Specifically, NT increased DON content and DON/TN, NT increased DON content, while NT increased TN content. Compared with CT, NT decreased peroxidase (POD) activity in 0-10 cm layer. Compared with NT, NT increased β-glucosidase (βG), cellobiase (CB), 1,4-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and POD activities, while NT only increased CB, NAG and POD activities in 0-10 cm soil layer, both alleviated microbial nutrient limitation. NT increased PPO activity in 10-20 cm layer. NT increased carbon conversion efficiency of stover compared with NT, and had the highest economic benefit. In all, no-tillage with 33% stover mulching was the optimal strategy, which could promote nutrient circulation, boost stover utilization efficiency, improve the quality of Mollisols, and maximize guaranteed income.
为了了解免耕不同秸秆覆盖量对土壤碳氮含量和酶活性的影响,找到既能满足土壤碳氮积累要求又能最大限度提高经济效益的秸秆覆盖量,我们自 2007 年以来在中国东北黑土区进行了一项长期的保护性耕作田间试验。我们分析了 2020 年 5 月种植前常规耕作(对照,CT)、免耕无秸秆覆盖(NT)、免耕 33%秸秆覆盖(NT)、免耕 67%秸秆覆盖(NT)和免耕 100%秸秆覆盖(NT)下的土壤碳氮含量、酶活性和经济效益。结果表明,与 CT 相比,NT 不影响土壤有机碳(SOC)和全氮(TN)含量,但增加了土壤有机碳的抗分解性,降低了溶解有机氮(DON)和铵态氮的有效性。与 NT 相比,秸秆覆盖免耕显著增加了 0-10 cm 土层的 SOC 含量,且随着秸秆量的增加而增加。此外,NT 和 NT 显著增加了 SOC 储量,有利于土壤有机质的积累。不同秸秆覆盖量对 0-10 cm 土层土壤氮含量的影响不同。具体来说,NT 增加了 DON 含量和 DON/TN,NT 增加了 DON 含量,而 NT 增加了 TN 含量。与 CT 相比,NT 降低了 0-10 cm 土层的过氧化物酶(POD)活性。与 NT 相比,NT 增加了 β-葡萄糖苷酶(βG)、纤维二糖酶(CB)、1,4-β-N-乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)、多酚氧化酶(PPO)和 POD 活性,而 NT 仅增加了 0-10 cm 土层的 CB、NAG 和 POD 活性,均缓解了微生物养分限制。NT 增加了 10-20 cm 土层的 PPO 活性。NT 提高了秸秆的碳转化效率,与 NT 相比经济效益最高。总之,免耕 33%秸秆覆盖量是最佳策略,既能促进养分循环,提高秸秆利用效率,改善黑土质量,又能最大限度保证收入。