• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳磨牙近中咬合面复合树脂修复：六年随访

Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a six-year follow-up.

作者信息

Varpio M

出版信息

ASDC J Dent Child. 1985 Nov-Dec;52(6):435-40.

PMID:3864801
Abstract

Composite resin was tested in shallow, class II cavities in 91 primary molars. The proportion of successful restorations decreased from 86 percent after the first year to 38 percent from the fourth to the sixth year. Altogether, 46 percent were failures; significantly more failures occurred in the upper molars. The composite resin (concise Cap-C-Rynze) proved to be too sensitive to variations in clinical management.

摘要

在91颗乳磨牙的Ⅱ类浅洞中对复合树脂进行了测试。成功修复的比例从第一年的86%降至第四年至第六年的38%。总体而言，46%为失败案例；上颌磨牙出现的失败案例明显更多。事实证明，复合树脂（简明Cap-C-Rynze）对临床操作的变化过于敏感。

相似文献

1
Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a six-year follow-up.乳磨牙近中咬合面复合树脂修复：六年随访
ASDC J Dent Child. 1985 Nov-Dec;52(6):435-40.
2
Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a two-year follow-up.乳磨牙近中咬合面复合树脂修复：两年随访
ASDC J Dent Child. 1981 Nov-Dec;48(6):411-6.
3
Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.高 C 因素窝洞树脂复合材料修复体的耐用性：12 年随访。
J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
4
Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.使用聚酸改性复合树脂和混合复合树脂对乳磨牙Ⅱ类洞修复体进行的三年随访评估
Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):148-52.
5
Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.随机试验研究在乳磨牙 I 类和 II 类斜面预备中使用树脂基修复体：48 个月的结果。
J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
6
Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.在牙科诊所使用聚酸改性复合树脂对乳磨牙进行II类修复：两年临床评估结果
Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):259-64.
7
Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.一种硅烷化复合树脂的三年临床评估
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 May-Jun;26(3):179-90. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12077. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
8
Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation.可流动树脂复合材料作为乳磨牙Ⅱ类洞修复材料的两年临床评估。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2006 Nov;64(6):334-40. doi: 10.1080/00016350600788245.
9
Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.直接树脂复合材料修复体与间接复合嵌体：一年的结果。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 May 1;11(3):025-32.
10
Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.II类洞型中聚酸改性树脂复合体/树脂复合体开放式三明治技术的九年评估
J Dent. 2007 Feb;35(2):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial.树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀与复合树脂用于Ⅱ类乳磨牙修复的比较：一项为期2年的平行随机临床试验。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(6):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0371-7. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
2
Clinical assessment of class II resin-based composites versus preformed metal crowns performed on primary molars in patients at high risk of caries.对龋齿高风险患者的乳磨牙进行的基于树脂的II类复合树脂与预成金属冠的临床评估。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Feb;19(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s40368-017-0322-8. Epub 2018 Jan 12.