Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jun 1;178(6):586-594. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0683.
Restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the lives of young children, but the association between the pandemic and any changes in early childhood developmental milestone achievement in the US remains unclear.
To determine the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in developmental screening scores among US children aged 0 to 5 years and to investigate whether caregivers self-reported more worries about their children or concerns about children's behavior during the pandemic, regardless of milestone achievement.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cohort study using an interrupted time series analysis comparing prepandemic (March 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020), interruption (March 1 to May 31, 2020), and intrapandemic (June 1, 2020, to May 30, 2022) periods among 50 205 children (randomly sampled from a population of 502 052 children) aged 0 to 5 years whose parents or caregivers completed developmental screening at pediatric visits at US pediatric primary care practices participating in a web-based clinical process support system.
COVID-19 pandemic period.
Age-standardized Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ) domain scores (communication, personal-social, problem-solving, gross motor, fine motor), and rate of caregivers' concerns about the child's behavior or worries about the child as measured on the ASQ.
A total of 50 205 children (25 852 [51.5%] male; mean [SD] age, 18.6 [16.0] months) and 134 342 ASQ observations were included. In adjusted models, significant age-specific mean score decreases from prepandemic to intrapandemic were observed in communication (-0.029; 95% CI, -0.041 to -0.017), problem-solving (-0.018; 95% CI, -0.030 to -0.006), and personal-social (-0.016; 95% CI, -0.028 to -0.004) domains. There were no changes in fine or gross motor domains prepandemic to intrapandemic. For infants aged 0 to 12 months, similar effect sizes were observed but only for communication (-0.027; 95% CI, -0.044 to -0.011) and problem-solving (-0.018; 95% CI, -0.035 to -0.001). After accounting for age-standardized ASQ scores, caregiver worries about the child increased slightly in the intrapandemic period compared with the prepandemic period (rate ratio, 1.088; 95% CI, 1.036-1.143), but there were no changes in caregiver concerns about the child's behavior. While changes in developmental screening scores were modest (2%-3%), nationwide, this could translate to more than 1500 additional recommended developmental referrals over baseline each month.
Modest changes in developmental screening scores are reassuring in the short term but may tax an already overburdened developmental behavioral pediatrics infrastructure. Continued attention to developmental surveillance is critical since the long-term population- and individual-level implications of these changes are unclear.
与 COVID-19 大流行相关的限制打乱了幼儿的生活,但在美国,大流行与幼儿早期发展里程碑成就的任何变化之间的关联仍不清楚。
确定 COVID-19 大流行与美国 0 至 5 岁儿童发展筛查评分变化之间的关联,并调查无论里程碑成就如何,看护人是否更担心孩子或担心孩子在大流行期间的行为。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项队列研究,使用中断时间序列分析比较了大流行前(2018 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 29 日)、中断(2020 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日)和大流行期间(2020 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 30 日)期间的 50205 名儿童(从 502052 名儿童的人群中随机抽样),其父母或看护人在参与基于网络的临床过程支持系统的美国儿科初级保健实践中进行儿科就诊时完成了发展筛查。
COVID-19 大流行期间。
年龄标准化的阶段和阶段问卷,第三版(ASQ)域评分(沟通、个人社交、解决问题、大运动、精细运动),以及 ASQ 测量的儿童行为问题的看护人关注率或对儿童的担忧率。
共纳入 50205 名儿童(25852 名[51.5%]男性;平均[SD]年龄,18.6[16.0]个月)和 134342 次 ASQ 观察。在调整后的模型中,从大流行前到大流行期间,观察到与年龄相关的沟通(-0.029;95%CI,-0.041 至-0.017)、解决问题(-0.018;95%CI,-0.030 至-0.006)和个人社交(-0.016;95%CI,-0.028 至-0.004)领域的显著平均评分下降。大流行前到大流行期间精细或大运动领域没有变化。对于 0 至 12 个月大的婴儿,观察到了类似的效应大小,但仅在沟通(-0.027;95%CI,-0.044 至-0.011)和解决问题(-0.018;95%CI,-0.035 至-0.001)领域。在考虑年龄标准化 ASQ 评分后,与大流行前时期相比,大流行期间看护人对孩子的担忧略有增加(比率,1.088;95%CI,1.036 至 1.143),但对孩子行为的关注没有变化。虽然发育筛查评分的变化幅度较小(2%-3%),但全国范围内,这每月可能会增加超过 1500 例额外的推荐发育转介。
短期来看,发育筛查评分的适度变化令人欣慰,但可能会给已经负担过重的发育行为儿科学基础设施带来压力。由于这些变化对人群和个人水平的长期影响尚不清楚,因此仍需继续关注发育监测。