Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1097-1119. doi: 10.1177/00315125241248309. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
We examined the allocation of visual attention in an association task by both neurotypical participants (n = 11) and adults with fluent aphasia (n = 12). Participants were presented with a picture (e.g., a basket) followed by a semantically related association (i.e., "strawberry") and an orthographically related association (i.e., "b," the first letter of "basket"). An eye tracker recorded their eye movements for three areas of interest (AOI): the picture, the semantic associate, and the orthographic associate, over 1396 observations. Results showed that both neurotypical participants and participants with aphasia looked longer at the semantic associate than at the picture, and this difference was more pronounced for neurotypicals than for people with aphasia (PWA). Neurotypicals also looked longer than the PWA group at the orthographic associate than at the prior picture. Regarding eye fixation counts, both participant groups looked more frequently at the semantic associate than at either the picture or the orthographic associate. Notably, this pattern was more pronounced among neurotypical participants than PWA. Our findings emphasize the importance of semantic associations in fluent aphasia and suggest a potential rehabilitative approach in speech and language therapy.
我们通过神经正常的参与者(n=11)和流畅性失语症成年人(n=12)来检查联想任务中的视觉注意力分配。参与者会先看到一张图片(例如一个篮子),然后是一个语义相关的联想词(即“草莓”)和一个拼写相关的联想词(即“b”,“篮子”的首字母)。眼动追踪器记录了他们在三个感兴趣区域(AOI)的眼动:图片、语义联想词和拼写联想词,共记录了 1396 次观察。结果表明,神经正常的参与者和失语症患者比图片注视语义联想词的时间更长,而神经正常的参与者比失语症患者的差异更为明显(PWA)。神经正常的参与者比 PWA 组注视拼写联想词的时间也比之前的图片更长。就眼动固定点计数而言,两组参与者注视语义联想词的次数都比图片或拼写联想词多。值得注意的是,这种模式在神经正常的参与者中比 PWA 组更为明显。我们的发现强调了语义联想在流畅性失语症中的重要性,并为言语和语言治疗提供了一种潜在的康复方法。