Suppr超能文献

商品价格和治理对热带农业前沿扩张的影响。

Impacts of commodity prices and governance on the expansion of tropical agricultural frontiers.

机构信息

Institute for Food and Resource Economics, University of Bonn, Nussallee 21, 53115, Bonn, Germany.

Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, Genscherallee 3, 53113, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 22;14(1):9209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59446-0.

Abstract

Deforestation in the tropics remains a significant global challenge linked to carbon emissions and biodiversity loss. Agriculture, forestry, wildfires, and urbanization have been repeatedly identified as main drivers of tropical deforestation. Understanding the underlying mechanisms behind these direct causes is crucial to navigate the multiple tradeoffs between competing forest uses, such as food and biomass production (SDG 2), climate action (SDG 13), and life on land (SDG 15). This paper develops and implements a global-scale empirical approach to quantify two key factors affecting land use decisions at tropical forest frontiers: agricultural commodity prices and national governance. It relies on data covering the period 2004-2015 from multiple public sources, aggregated to countries and agro-ecological zones. Our analysis confirms the persistent influence of commodity prices on agricultural land expansion, especially in forest-abundant regions. Economic and environmental governance quality co-determines processes of expansion and contraction of agricultural land in the tropics, yet at much smaller magnitudes than other drivers. We derive land supply elasticities for direct use in standard economic impact assessment models and demonstrate that our results make a difference in a Computable General Equilibrium framework.

摘要

热带森林砍伐仍然是一个全球性的重大挑战,与碳排放和生物多样性丧失有关。农业、林业、野火和城市化已被反复确定为热带森林砍伐的主要驱动因素。了解这些直接原因背后的潜在机制对于在粮食和生物质生产(可持续发展目标 2)、气候行动(可持续发展目标 13)和陆地生命(可持续发展目标 15)等相互竞争的森林用途之间进行权衡至关重要。本文开发并实施了一种全球规模的经验方法,以量化影响热带森林前沿土地利用决策的两个关键因素:农产品价格和国家治理。它依赖于 2004-2015 年期间来自多个公共来源的数据,汇总到国家和农业生态区。我们的分析证实了商品价格对农业土地扩张的持续影响,特别是在森林资源丰富的地区。经济和环境治理质量共同决定了热带地区农业土地的扩张和收缩过程,但影响要小得多。我们得出了直接用于标准经济影响评估模型的土地供应弹性,并证明了我们的结果在可计算一般均衡框架中有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c57a/11035705/109e63a033a7/41598_2024_59446_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impacts of commodity prices and governance on the expansion of tropical agricultural frontiers.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 22;14(1):9209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59446-0.
2
Global economic trade-offs between wild nature and tropical agriculture.
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jul 21;15(7):e2001657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001657. eCollection 2017 Jul.
3
International trade causes large net economic losses in tropical countries via the destruction of ecosystem services.
Ambio. 2016 May;45(4):387-97. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0768-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
5
Export-oriented deforestation in Mato Grosso: harbinger or exception for other tropical forests?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Apr 22;368(1619):20120173. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0173. Print 2013 Jun 5.
6
Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1875-88. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1037.
7
Disentangling the numbers behind agriculture-driven tropical deforestation.
Science. 2022 Sep 9;377(6611):eabm9267. doi: 10.1126/science.abm9267.
8
Carbon emissions from agricultural expansion and intensification in the Chaco.
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 May;23(5):1902-1916. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13521. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
9
Agricultural expansion and the ecological marginalization of forest-dependent people.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 2;118(44). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100436118.
10
Deforestation scenarios for the Bolivian lowlands.
Environ Res. 2016 Jan;144(Pt B):49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Benefits and trade-offs of optimizing global land use for food, water, and carbon.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 17;120(42):e2220371120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220371120. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
2
Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.
Nat Food. 2021 Mar;2(3):198-209. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts.
Science. 2023 Apr 21;380(6642):eabl4881. doi: 10.1126/science.abl4881.
4
Tropical deforestation causes large reductions in observed precipitation.
Nature. 2023 Mar;615(7951):270-275. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05690-1. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Disentangling the numbers behind agriculture-driven tropical deforestation.
Science. 2022 Sep 9;377(6611):eabm9267. doi: 10.1126/science.abm9267.
6
What's governance got to do with it? Examining the relationship between governance and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 23;17(6):e0269729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269729. eCollection 2022.
7
Accelerated forest fragmentation leads to critical increase in tropical forest edge area.
Sci Adv. 2021 Sep 10;7(37):eabg7012. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg7012. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
8
Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated.
Nat Commun. 2021 May 11;12(1):2501. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22702-2.
9
The Brazilian Amazon deforestation rate in 2020 is the greatest of the decade.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Feb;5(2):144-145. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-01368-x.
10
Classifying drivers of global forest loss.
Science. 2018 Sep 14;361(6407):1108-1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验