Bell W T, Chalian V A, Moore B K
J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Sep;54(3):404-10. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90561-x.
The need for more acceptable materials for use in maxillofacial prosthetics has long been recognized. In this study, the physical properties of several currently available polydimethyl siloxane materials were evaluated and compared with those of two previously tested materials. The properties chosen were tensile strength, elongation, tear strength, and hardness. These properties were chosen as indicators of the strength, flexibility, durability, and lifelike feel of the materials in clinical service. Testing procedures were intended to duplicate as nearly as possible those used by Chalian and Jones and to conform closely to ASTM specifications. In general, the physical properties of the five silicone materials tested in this study were superior to those of MDX-4-4210 and MDX-4-4514, tested previously. This superiority was particularly evident in terms of strength and elongation. Although the materials failed to demonstrate the softness of other materials, they may prove acceptable with the addition of available modifiers. Although no material was consistently superior to the others, potential merit is seen especially in Q7-4635 and SE-4524U. These materials exhibited high strength and softness and are available in one component system. Unlike the two-component addition chemistry systems, these materials have an indefinite pot life and are much more easily manipulated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
长期以来,人们一直认识到需要有更适合用于颌面修复术的材料。在本研究中,对几种目前可用的聚二甲基硅氧烷材料的物理性能进行了评估,并与之前测试的两种材料的性能进行了比较。所选择的性能包括拉伸强度、伸长率、撕裂强度和硬度。选择这些性能作为材料在临床应用中的强度、柔韧性、耐用性和逼真触感的指标。测试程序旨在尽可能复制Chalian和Jones所使用的程序,并严格符合美国材料与试验协会(ASTM)的规范。总体而言,本研究中测试的五种硅酮材料的物理性能优于之前测试的MDX - 4 - 4210和MDX - 4 - 4514。这种优势在强度和伸长率方面尤为明显。尽管这些材料未能表现出其他材料的柔软性,但添加可用的改性剂后可能会被接受。虽然没有一种材料始终优于其他材料,但特别是Q7 - 4635和SE - 4524U具有潜在优势。这些材料具有高强度和柔软性,并且是单组分体系。与双组分加成化学体系不同,这些材料的适用期无限,并且更容易操作。(摘要截短于250字)