Suppr超能文献

新生儿听觉脑干反应与行为筛查的比较

Comparison of auditory brainstem response and behavioral screening in neonates.

作者信息

Durieux-Smith A, Jacobson J T

出版信息

J Otolaryngol Suppl. 1985 Feb;14:47-53.

PMID:3864993
Abstract

This paper reports on two studies, one in Halifax and the other in Ottawa, which compared behavioral methods and BERA in the screening of hearing loss in neonates. The Halifax study used BERA as the screening procedure for infants of a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and as a supplementary procedure to behavioral screening test for non-NICU but "at risk" infants. The results of this study indicate false positive rates with the behavioral test of 86.1 and 50.5% for NICU and at risk groups respectively. The Ottawa study evaluated the Crib-o-gram as a screening test for NICU infants using BERA as the standard. The results of this study indicated that approximately one third of babies with normal BERA thresholds failed Crib-o-gram screening and that Crib-o-gram could identify moderately/severe losses.

摘要

本文报道了两项研究,一项在哈利法克斯进行,另一项在渥太华进行,这两项研究比较了行为方法和脑干听觉诱发电位(BERA)在新生儿听力损失筛查中的应用。哈利法克斯的研究将BERA用作新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)婴儿的筛查程序,并作为非NICU但“有风险”婴儿行为筛查测试的补充程序。该研究结果表明,NICU组和有风险组的行为测试假阳性率分别为86.1%和50.5%。渥太华的研究以BERA为标准,评估了婴儿床图表作为NICU婴儿筛查测试的情况。该研究结果表明,约三分之一脑干听觉诱发电位阈值正常的婴儿未通过婴儿床图表筛查,且婴儿床图表能够识别中度/重度听力损失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验