Suppr超能文献

用于婴儿听力筛查的婴儿听力图与听觉脑干反应对比

Crib-O-Gram vs. auditory brain stem response for infant hearing screening.

作者信息

Shimizu H, Walters R J, Kennedy D W, Allen M C, Markowitz R K, Luebkert F R

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 1985 Jul;95(7 Pt 1):806-10.

PMID:4010420
Abstract

As a part of the longitudinal evaluation of a cluster of neonatal hearing screening procedures in a single high risk population, Crib-O-Gram (COG) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) screening have been administered to 190 infants in the NICU. Multiple COG screening showed inconsistent results in 25% of the infants. The COG failure rate was 27.9% with 2 out of 3 pass criterion. In the two-intensity ABR screening (70 dB and 30 dB), 17.9% failed at 30 dB bilaterally and 30.0% failed unilaterally. The repeated ABR screening and behavioral observation audiometry at age 6 months identified one infant with a significant hearing loss in 78 infants. Two thirds of the COG failures and a little more than half of the ABR failures had a problem mainly with the middle ear. Advantages and disadvantages of each procedure are presented.

摘要

作为对单一高危人群中一系列新生儿听力筛查程序进行纵向评估的一部分,对新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的190名婴儿进行了摇篮图(COG)和听性脑干反应(ABR)筛查。多次COG筛查显示,25%的婴儿结果不一致。采用3选2通过标准时,COG的失败率为27.9%。在两强度ABR筛查(70分贝和30分贝)中,17.9%的婴儿在30分贝时双侧听力筛查未通过,30.0%的婴儿单侧未通过。在6个月大时进行的重复ABR筛查和行为观察听力测试发现,78名婴儿中有1名婴儿存在明显听力损失。三分之二的COG筛查未通过者和略多于一半的ABR筛查未通过者主要存在中耳问题。文中介绍了每种筛查程序的优缺点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验