Mishra Neel Kamal, Singh Robin, Prakash Ravi, Gautam Shefali, Arshad Zia, Yadav Kirtika
Anesthesiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 23;16(3):e56784. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56784. eCollection 2024 Mar.
A side effect of spinal anesthesia is post-dural puncture backache (PDPB), which is characterized by ongoing discomfort at the location of the spinal puncture without any radicular pain. This study aims to compare the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture back pain following spinal anesthesia by median versus paramedian technique in obese female patients.
A prospective randomized comparative study on 120 female patients, aged 20-50 years with a BMI of 30-40 kg/m and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II, scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia, was included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 60 patients in each group. Group P uses the paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia, and group M uses the midline approach for spinal anesthesia.
Low back pain incidence was lower in group P than in group M at seven days, but at one month and after, its incidence remained the same in both groups. No difference in the severity of pain was observed.
The occurrence of back pain in the first seven days of surgery was significantly more frequent with the median approach. The pain severity decreased as the time passed from day seven to three months of follow-up. There is no difference in the severity of pain with either approach at different intervals.
脊髓麻醉的一个副作用是硬膜穿刺后背痛(PDPB),其特征是脊髓穿刺部位持续不适且无任何神经根性疼痛。本研究旨在比较肥胖女性患者采用正中与旁正中技术进行脊髓麻醉后硬膜穿刺后背痛的发生率和严重程度。
一项前瞻性随机对照研究纳入了120例年龄在20 - 50岁、BMI为30 - 40kg/m²且美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为II级、计划在脊髓麻醉下进行择期手术的女性患者。患者被随机分为两组,每组60例。P组采用旁正中法进行脊髓麻醉,M组采用正中法进行脊髓麻醉。
P组在术后7天的腰痛发生率低于M组,但在1个月及以后,两组的发生率相同。未观察到疼痛严重程度的差异。
正中法在手术的前7天背痛的发生率明显更高。从术后7天到随访3个月,疼痛严重程度随着时间推移而降低。不同时间间隔下,两种方法在疼痛严重程度上没有差异。