McBenedict Billy, Hauwanga Wilhelmina N, Pires Mariana P, Netto José Geraldo M, Petrus Dulci, Kanchwala Jumana A, Joshi Rhea, Alurkar Shaista Rizwan Ahamed, Chankseliani Otari, Mansoor Zaeemah, Subash Sona, Alphonse Berley, Abrahão Ana, Lima Pessôa Bruno
Neurosurgery, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, BRA.
Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRA.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 22;16(3):e56746. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56746. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Pain management is a critical aspect of cancer treatment and palliative care, where pain can significantly impact quality of life. Chronic pain, which affects a significant number of people worldwide, remains a prevalent and challenging symptom for patients. While medications and psychosocial support systems play a role in pain management, surgical and radiological interventions, including cingulotomy, may be necessary for refractory cases. Cingulotomy, a neurosurgical procedure targeting the cingulate gyrus, aims to disrupt neural pathways associated with emotional processing and pain sensation, thereby reducing the affective component of pain. Although cingulotomy has shown promise in providing pain relief, particularly in patients refractory to traditional medical treatment, its use has declined in recent years due to advancements in non-destructive therapies and concerns about long-term efficacy and patient suitability. Modern stereotactic methods have enhanced the precision and safety of cingulotomy, reducing associated complications and mortality rates. Despite these advancements, questions remain regarding its long-term efficacy and suitability for patients with limited life expectancy, particularly those with cancer. A comprehensive systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, aimed at providing insights into the efficacy, potential benefits, and limitations of this neurosurgical procedure in managing intractable pain. An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted with open database coverage dates. The review focused on outcomes such as pain intensity and quality of life. The inclusion criteria encompassed human studies of any age experiencing intractable cancer or non-cancer pain, with cingulotomy as the primary intervention. Various study designs were considered, including observational studies, clinical trials, and reviews focusing on pain and cingulotomy. Exclusion criteria included non-human studies, non-peer-reviewed articles, and studies unrelated to pain or cingulotomy. This review highlights the efficacy of stereotactic anterior cingulotomy in managing intractable pain, particularly when conventional treatments fail. Advanced MRI-guided techniques enhance precision, but challenges like cost and expertise persist. Studies included in this review showed significant pain relief with minimal adverse effects, although the optimal target remains debated. Neurocognitive risks exist, but outcomes are generally favorable. Expected adverse events include transient effects like urinary incontinence and confusion. Reoperation may be necessary for inadequate pain control, with a median pain relief duration of three months to a year. A double stereotactic cingulotomy appears to be safe and effective for refractory pain.
疼痛管理是癌症治疗和姑息治疗的关键环节,疼痛会对生活质量产生重大影响。慢性疼痛在全球影响着大量人群,仍然是患者普遍面临且具有挑战性的症状。虽然药物和社会心理支持系统在疼痛管理中发挥作用,但对于难治性病例,可能需要手术和放射学干预,包括扣带回切开术。扣带回切开术是一种针对扣带回的神经外科手术,旨在破坏与情绪处理和疼痛感觉相关的神经通路,从而减轻疼痛的情感成分。尽管扣带回切开术在缓解疼痛方面显示出前景,特别是对于传统医学治疗无效的患者,但由于非破坏性疗法的进展以及对长期疗效和患者适用性的担忧,其应用近年来有所减少。现代立体定向方法提高了扣带回切开术的精确性和安全性,降低了相关并发症和死亡率。尽管有这些进展,但对于其长期疗效以及对预期寿命有限的患者,特别是癌症患者的适用性,仍存在疑问。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020指南进行了一项全面的系统评价,旨在深入了解这种神经外科手术在治疗顽固性疼痛方面的疗效、潜在益处和局限性。对PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science进行了电子检索,数据库覆盖日期不限。该评价关注疼痛强度和生活质量等结果。纳入标准包括对任何年龄经历顽固性癌症或非癌症疼痛且以扣带回切开术为主要干预措施的人类研究。考虑了各种研究设计,包括观察性研究、临床试验以及关注疼痛和扣带回切开术的综述。排除标准包括非人类研究、非同行评审文章以及与疼痛或扣带回切开术无关的研究。本综述强调了立体定向前扣带回切开术在治疗顽固性疼痛方面的疗效,特别是在传统治疗失败时。先进的MRI引导技术提高了精确性,但成本和专业知识等挑战仍然存在。本综述纳入的研究显示疼痛得到显著缓解且不良反应最小,尽管最佳靶点仍存在争议。存在神经认知风险,但总体结果良好。预期的不良事件包括尿失禁和意识模糊等短暂影响。对于疼痛控制不足可能需要再次手术,疼痛缓解的中位持续时间为三个月至一年。双侧立体定向扣带回切开术对于难治性疼痛似乎是安全有效的。