Arunachalam Sakthiyendran Naveen, Padala Venkata Jaswanth, Seide Melinda, See Jia Whei, Sabu Nagma, Sharma Asmita, Silat Mohammed T, Katariya Kabeer, Chauhan Sonali, Fatima Urooj
Neurological Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA.
Internal Medicine, GSL Medical College, Rajamahendravaram, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 14;17(2):e79022. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79022. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Despite advancements in psychiatric treatments, many patients with treatment-resistant disorders are turning to neurosurgical interventions. These include neuromodulation-based surgeries such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and ablative surgeries such as cingulotomy, offering relief for severe conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety, and substance use disorder. While "psychosurgery" has sparked debate due to concerns about patient well-being, recent studies indicate promising symptom improvement rates across various psychiatric conditions while also demonstrating overall safety. Neuromodulation techniques, such as DBS, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), have evolved in regard to their sensitivity and their ability to target specific brain regions to alleviate psychiatric symptoms. Despite their benefits, these therapies have been shown to elicit side effects such as memory loss and seizures in patients, which has sparked controversy in the use of this technology across clinicians and patients. Ablative therapies, on the other hand, are concerning for being overly invasive in their approach toward psychiatric care. Despite the stigma associated with these neurosurgical interventions for psychiatric care, these procedures often remain a last resort for many patients, highlighting the need for continued research to improve these treatments and expand options for those in need. In this narrative review, we examine the current literature to elicit an understanding of neurosurgical history in regard to psychiatric disorder treatment and its implications for clinical practice.
尽管精神科治疗取得了进展,但许多患有难治性疾病的患者正在转向神经外科干预。这些干预措施包括基于神经调节的手术,如深部脑刺激(DBS),以及切除性手术,如扣带回切开术,可为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、抑郁症、精神分裂症、强迫症(OCD)、焦虑症和物质使用障碍等严重疾病提供缓解。虽然“精神外科手术”因对患者福祉的担忧而引发了争论,但最近的研究表明,在各种精神疾病中,症状改善率很有前景,同时也证明了总体安全性。神经调节技术,如DBS、经颅磁刺激(TMS)和电休克疗法(ECT),在其敏感性和靶向特定脑区以缓解精神症状的能力方面都有了发展。尽管这些疗法有好处,但已证明它们会在患者中引发记忆力减退和癫痫发作等副作用,这在临床医生和患者对这项技术的使用中引发了争议。另一方面,切除性疗法因其在精神科护理方法上过于侵入性而令人担忧。尽管这些用于精神科护理的神经外科干预措施存在污名化,但这些手术往往仍然是许多患者的最后手段,这凸显了持续研究以改进这些治疗方法并为有需要的人扩大选择的必要性。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们研究了当前的文献,以了解神经外科治疗精神疾病的历史及其对临床实践的影响。