Sara Blaybel, Ghinwa Hammoud, Layla Mourda, Mahmoud Hallal, Ali Khalil, Remy Mckey
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences Lebanese University Hadat Lebanon.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Al Zahraa Hospital University Medical Center (Zhumc) Beirut Lebanon.
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 22;7(4):e2047. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2047. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Bowel preparation is considered as major obstacle before colonoscopy, and it is often reported as the most feared part of the procedure. The aim of this study is to determine the difference in efficacy between a split dose of PEG and the previous day regimen in cleaning the colon, using Boston bowel preparation scale. In addition, also to evaluate patient satisfaction regarding the modality of preparation.
The study included 200 hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy at Beirut hospitals between 2021 and 2023. One of the two regimens will be prescribed randomly to the patients before colonoscopy: 98 (49%) in Group A (patients treated with PEG preparation as a split dose for 2 days), and 102 (51%) in Group B (patients taking PEG preparation as a whole dose). Data was analyzed using SPSS version 25.
Patients were distributed between 105 (52.5%) males and 95 (47.5%) females. The top two indications for colonoscopy were bleeding (34%), change in bowel habits (constipation/diarrhea) (32%). Patients experienced adverse events noting cramps (48.5%), stomach ache (32%), headache (31%), vomiting (53%), nausea (53%), sleep disturbance (27%), bloating (26.5%), and malaise (26%). A statistically significant difference ( = 0.040) was detected in sleep disturbance: 20.4% of patients in group A and 33.3% of patients in group B. The average satisfaction score was 3.02 ± 1.03 over 4 (Group A) and 3.04 ± 0.99 over 4 (Group B) ( = 0.896). The average BBPS was 8.07 ± 1.14 (Group A) and 8.28 ± 1.0 (Group B) ( = 0.162).
The two administrations were almost similar in term of satisfaction and BBPS. As multiple factors like age, sexe, comorbidities may contribute in altering how much a given drug is safe and efficace, more research is needed to choose the best 3regimen for each patient.
肠道准备被认为是结肠镜检查前的主要障碍,并且经常被报告为该检查过程中最令人恐惧的部分。本研究的目的是使用波士顿肠道准备量表确定分次服用聚乙二醇(PEG)与前一天方案在清洁结肠方面的疗效差异。此外,还要评估患者对准备方式的满意度。
该研究纳入了2021年至2023年期间在贝鲁特医院接受结肠镜检查的200名住院患者。在结肠镜检查前,将两种方案之一随机分配给患者:A组98例(49%)(患者接受PEG分两天分次服用进行肠道准备),B组102例(51%)(患者接受PEG全剂量服用)。使用SPSS 25版对数据进行分析。
患者中男性105例(52.5%),女性95例(47.5%)。结肠镜检查的前两大适应证是出血(34%)、排便习惯改变(便秘/腹泻)(32%)。患者经历的不良事件包括腹痛(48.5%)、胃痛(32%)、头痛(31%)、呕吐(53%)、恶心(53%)、睡眠障碍(27%)、腹胀(26.5%)和不适(26%)。在睡眠障碍方面检测到统计学显著差异(P = 0.040):A组20.4%的患者和B组33.3%的患者。平均满意度评分在4分制下,A组为3.02±1.03,B组为3.04±0.99(P = 0.896)。平均波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分,A组为8.07±1.14,B组为8.28±1.0(P = 0.162)。
在满意度和BBPS方面,两种给药方式几乎相似。由于年龄、性别、合并症等多种因素可能会影响某种药物的安全性和有效性,因此需要更多研究为每位患者选择最佳方案。