• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于结肠镜检查的聚乙二醇分剂量与全剂量肠道准备:2021年至2023年期间黎巴嫩的一项多中心前瞻性随机试验。

Split doses versus whole dose bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A multicentric prospective Lebanese randomized trial between 2021 and 2023.

作者信息

Sara Blaybel, Ghinwa Hammoud, Layla Mourda, Mahmoud Hallal, Ali Khalil, Remy Mckey

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences Lebanese University Hadat Lebanon.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Al Zahraa Hospital University Medical Center (Zhumc) Beirut Lebanon.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 22;7(4):e2047. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2047. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.2047
PMID:38655418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11035750/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Bowel preparation is considered as major obstacle before colonoscopy, and it is often reported as the most feared part of the procedure. The aim of this study is to determine the difference in efficacy between a split dose of PEG and the previous day regimen in cleaning the colon, using Boston bowel preparation scale. In addition, also to evaluate patient satisfaction regarding the modality of preparation.

METHODS

The study included 200 hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy at Beirut hospitals between 2021 and 2023. One of the two regimens will be prescribed randomly to the patients before colonoscopy: 98 (49%) in Group A (patients treated with PEG preparation as a split dose for 2 days), and 102 (51%) in Group B (patients taking PEG preparation as a whole dose). Data was analyzed using SPSS version 25.

RESULTS

Patients were distributed between 105 (52.5%) males and 95 (47.5%) females. The top two indications for colonoscopy were bleeding (34%), change in bowel habits (constipation/diarrhea) (32%). Patients experienced adverse events noting cramps (48.5%), stomach ache (32%), headache (31%), vomiting (53%), nausea (53%), sleep disturbance (27%), bloating (26.5%), and malaise (26%). A statistically significant difference ( = 0.040) was detected in sleep disturbance: 20.4% of patients in group A and 33.3% of patients in group B. The average satisfaction score was 3.02 ± 1.03 over 4 (Group A) and 3.04 ± 0.99 over 4 (Group B) ( = 0.896). The average BBPS was 8.07 ± 1.14 (Group A) and 8.28 ± 1.0 (Group B) ( = 0.162).

CONCLUSION

The two administrations were almost similar in term of satisfaction and BBPS. As multiple factors like age, sexe, comorbidities may contribute in altering how much a given drug is safe and efficace, more research is needed to choose the best 3regimen for each patient.

摘要

背景与目的

肠道准备被认为是结肠镜检查前的主要障碍,并且经常被报告为该检查过程中最令人恐惧的部分。本研究的目的是使用波士顿肠道准备量表确定分次服用聚乙二醇(PEG)与前一天方案在清洁结肠方面的疗效差异。此外,还要评估患者对准备方式的满意度。

方法

该研究纳入了2021年至2023年期间在贝鲁特医院接受结肠镜检查的200名住院患者。在结肠镜检查前,将两种方案之一随机分配给患者:A组98例(49%)(患者接受PEG分两天分次服用进行肠道准备),B组102例(51%)(患者接受PEG全剂量服用)。使用SPSS 25版对数据进行分析。

结果

患者中男性105例(52.5%),女性95例(47.5%)。结肠镜检查的前两大适应证是出血(34%)、排便习惯改变(便秘/腹泻)(32%)。患者经历的不良事件包括腹痛(48.5%)、胃痛(32%)、头痛(31%)、呕吐(53%)、恶心(53%)、睡眠障碍(27%)、腹胀(26.5%)和不适(26%)。在睡眠障碍方面检测到统计学显著差异(P = 0.040):A组20.4%的患者和B组33.3%的患者。平均满意度评分在4分制下,A组为3.02±1.03,B组为3.04±0.99(P = 0.896)。平均波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分,A组为8.07±1.14,B组为8.28±1.0(P = 0.162)。

结论

在满意度和BBPS方面,两种给药方式几乎相似。由于年龄、性别、合并症等多种因素可能会影响某种药物的安全性和有效性,因此需要更多研究为每位患者选择最佳方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c013/11035750/179f2cdb3c9d/HSR2-7-e2047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c013/11035750/c3036d49fa44/HSR2-7-e2047-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c013/11035750/a57cbd98e0e7/HSR2-7-e2047-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c013/11035750/179f2cdb3c9d/HSR2-7-e2047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c013/11035750/c3036d49fa44/HSR2-7-e2047-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c013/11035750/a57cbd98e0e7/HSR2-7-e2047-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c013/11035750/179f2cdb3c9d/HSR2-7-e2047-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Split doses versus whole dose bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A multicentric prospective Lebanese randomized trial between 2021 and 2023.用于结肠镜检查的聚乙二醇分剂量与全剂量肠道准备:2021年至2023年期间黎巴嫩的一项多中心前瞻性随机试验。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 22;7(4):e2047. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2047. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Effectiveness of low-volume split-dose versus same-day morning polyethylene glycol regimen for adequacy of bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.低容量分次与同日清晨聚乙二醇方案用于结肠镜检查患者肠道准备充分性的效果:一项单盲随机对照试验。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun;41(3):247-257. doi: 10.1007/s12664-021-01228-x. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
3
Bowel preparation using 2-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen plus lubiprostone versus 4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen: a randomized controlled trial.口服 2L 分剂量聚乙二醇方案联合鲁比前列酮与口服 4L 分剂量聚乙二醇方案用于肠道准备的随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 17;22(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02497-2.
4
Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy.分剂量与当日减量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液用于上午结肠镜检查的比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14488-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14488.
5
Polyethylene Glycol-3350 (Miralax®)+1.9-L sports drink (Gatorade®)+2 tablets of bisacodyl results in inferior bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared with Polyethylene Glycol-Ascorbic Acid (MoviPrep®).与聚乙二醇 - 抗坏血酸(MoviPrep®)相比,聚乙二醇 - 3350(Miralax®)+ 1.9升运动饮料(佳得乐®)+ 2片比沙可啶用于结肠镜检查的肠道准备效果较差。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;29(1):67-74. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17536.
6
Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Different Low-Volume Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes Solution Bowel Preparation for Morning Colonoscopy.两种不同小容量分次服用聚乙二醇电解质溶液肠道准备方案用于结肠镜检查清晨准备的疗效和耐受性。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug 31;2022:8169649. doi: 10.1155/2022/8169649. eCollection 2022.
7
Polyethylene glycol versus split high-dose senna for bowel preparation: A comparative prospective randomized study.聚乙二醇与分段高剂量番泻叶用于肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;35(11):1923-1929. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15101. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
3 L split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to 2 L polyethylene glycol in colonoscopic bowel preparation in relatively high-BMI (≥ 24 kg/m) individuals: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.3 L 分剂量聚乙二醇优于 2 L 聚乙二醇在相对高 BMI(≥ 24 kg/m)个体中的结肠镜肠道准备:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03068-9.
9
Efficacy of single- versus split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for morning colonoscopy: A randomized controlled study.单剂量与分剂量聚乙二醇电解质溶液用于上午结肠镜检查的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug 17;26(6):321-5. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_58_20.
10
Efficacy of mosapride citrate with a split dose of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.枸橼酸莫沙必利分剂量联合聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸用于老年患者肠道准备的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18702. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018702.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of enhanced bowel preparation on complications and prognosis following colonoscopic polypectomy.强化肠道准备对结肠镜下息肉切除术后并发症及预后的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jun 27;17(6):106264. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264.

本文引用的文献

1
A Phase 2 evaluation of a new flavored peg and sulfate solution compared to an over-the-counter laxative, peg and sports drink bowel preparation combination.一种新型口味 PEG 和硫酸盐溶液与一种非处方轻泻剂、PEG 和运动饮料肠道准备组合的 2 期评估。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03069-8.
2
The Impact of the Colonoscopy Starting Position and Its Potential Outcomes.结肠镜检查起始体位的影响及其潜在结果。
Cureus. 2022 May 14;14(5):e25000. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25000. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Colonoscopy: Preparation and Potential Complications.
结肠镜检查:准备工作及潜在并发症
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 18;12(3):747. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030747.
4
Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation.人工智能在肠道准备评估中的应用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Mar;95(3):512-518.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.041. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
5
Efficacy of single- versus split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for morning colonoscopy: A randomized controlled study.单剂量与分剂量聚乙二醇电解质溶液用于上午结肠镜检查的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug 17;26(6):321-5. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_58_20.
6
Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future.2020年结肠镜检查的肠道准备:回顾过去、审视当下与展望未来
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020 May 6;22(6):28. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-00764-4.
7
Personal instruction for patients before colonoscopies could improve bowel preparation quality and increase detection of colorectal adenomas.在结肠镜检查前对患者进行个性化指导可提高肠道准备质量并增加结直肠腺瘤的检出率。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;9(2):420-427. doi: 10.21037/apm.2020.03.24. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
8
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate and Polyethylene Glycol/Bisacodyl (The Bowklean Study).一项比较匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁和聚乙二醇/比沙可啶(The Bowklean 研究)肠道清洁效果的随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 27;10(1):5604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62120-w.
9
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation: subanalysis by age from a phase III, assessor-blinded study.即饮型肠道准备剂的疗效、安全性及耐受性:一项III期、评估者盲法研究的年龄亚组分析
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb 7;13:1756284820902878. doi: 10.1177/1756284820902878. eCollection 2020.
10
Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening strategies on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.量化遵循筛查策略对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的影响。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(2):824-836. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2735. Epub 2019 Nov 28.