School of Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Postgrad Med. 2024 Apr;136(3):337-345. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2024.2347830. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
This study aimed to assess whether superior clinical outcomes can be attained through piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP)+fluoroquinolone (FQ) combination therapy for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) compared to TZP monotherapy.
This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Korea. Adult inpatients diagnosed with pneumonia within 48 hours of hospitalization were included. Severe CAP was defined as a CURB-65 score of ≥ 3 or based on the 2007 guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) definition. Only patients who received either TZP and FQ combination or TZP as initial empirical therapy were included.
The final analysis included 145 patients; 57.9% received combination therapy and 42.1% received monotherapy. In the combination therapy group, body mass index (20.67 ± 3.28 vs. 22.26 ± 4.80, = 0.030) and asthma prevalence (0 vs. 8.3%, = 0.022) were significantly higher; initial symptoms, clinical severity, and causative pathogens were not significantly different between groups. White blood cell counts (12,641.64 ± 6,544.66 vs. 12,491.67 ± 10,528.24, = 0.008), and C-reactive protein levels (18.78 ± 11.47 vs. 26.58 ± 14.97, < 0.001) were significantly higher in the combination therapy group. Clinical outcomes, including all-cause in-hospital mortality rate (26.2 vs. 33.3%, = 0.358), were not significantly different between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified no significant association between FQ combination and all-cause in-hospital mortality.
In patients with severe CAP, there were no differences in the clinical outcomes, including mortality, between the TZP and FQ combination therapy and TZP monotherapy. FQ combination was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.
本研究旨在评估与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(TZP)单药治疗相比,对于重症社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者,TZP+氟喹诺酮(FQ)联合治疗是否能够获得更好的临床结局。
本回顾性研究在韩国的一家三级保健医院进行。纳入了在住院后 48 小时内确诊为肺炎的成年住院患者。重症 CAP 的定义为 CURB-65 评分≥3 分,或符合 2007 年美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会(IDSA/ATS)的定义。仅纳入接受 TZP+FQ 联合或 TZP 作为初始经验性治疗的患者。
最终分析纳入了 145 例患者;57.9%接受了联合治疗,42.1%接受了单药治疗。在联合治疗组中,体重指数(20.67±3.28 与 22.26±4.80, = 0.030)和哮喘患病率(0 与 8.3%, = 0.022)显著更高;两组初始症状、临床严重程度和病原体无显著差异。白细胞计数(12641.64±6544.66 与 12491.67±10528.24, = 0.008)和 C 反应蛋白水平(18.78±11.47 与 26.58±14.97, < 0.001)在联合治疗组中显著更高。两组的临床结局,包括全因住院死亡率(26.2%与 33.3%, = 0.358)均无显著差异。多变量分析未发现 FQ 联合与全因住院死亡率之间存在显著关联。
在重症 CAP 患者中,与 TZP 单药治疗相比,TZP+FQ 联合治疗在临床结局方面,包括死亡率,无显著差异。FQ 联合与住院死亡率无显著相关性。