Suppr超能文献

透视引导下尿道插管在盲目或膀胱镜辅助尿道插管失败情况下的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided urethral catheterization in case of failed blind or cystoscopy-assisted urethral catheterization.

作者信息

Kim Sang Woo, Nam In Chul, Kim Doo Ri, Lee Jeong Sub, Kim Jeong Jae, Kim Bong Su, Choi Guk Myung, Park Sung Eun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, 15, Aran 13-gil, Jeju, 63241, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, 11 Samjeongja-ro, Seongsan-gu, Changwon, 51472, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 24;14(1):9406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60224-1.

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided urethral catheterization in patients who failed blind or cystoscopy-assisted urethral catheterization. We utilized our institutional database between January 2011 and March 2023, and patients with failed blind or cystoscopy-assisted urethral catheterization and subsequent fluoroscopy-guided urethral catheterization were included. A 5-Fr catheter was inserted into the urethral orifice, and the retrograde urethrography (RGU) was acquired. Subsequently, the operator attempted to pass a hydrophilic guidewire to the urethra. If the guidewire and guiding catheter could be successfully passed into the bladder, but the urethral catheter failed pass due to urethral stricture, the operator determined either attempted again with a reduced catheter diameter or performed balloon dilation according to their preference. Finally, an appropriately sized urethral catheter was selected, and an endhole was created using an 18-gauge needle. The catheter was then inserted over the wire to position the tip in the bladder lumen and ballooned to secure it. We reviewed patients' medical histories, the presence of hematuria, and RGU to determine urethral abnormalities. Procedure-related data were assessed. Study enrolled a total of 179 fluoroscopy-guided urethral catheterizations from 149 patients (all males; mean age, 73.3 ± 13.3 years). A total of 225 urethral strictures were confirmed in 141 patients, while eight patients had no strictures. Urethral rupture was confirmed in 62 patients, and hematuria occurred in 34 patients after blind or cystoscopy-assisted urethral catheterization failed. Technical and clinical success rates were 100%, and procedure-related complications were observed in four patients (2.2%). The mean time from request to urethral catheter insertion was 129.7 ± 127.8 min. The mean total fluoroscopy time was 3.5 ± 2.5 min and the mean total DAP was 25.4 ± 25.1 Gy cm. Balloon dilation was performed in 77 patients. Total procedure time was 9.2 ± 7.6 min, and the mean procedure time without balloon dilation was 7.1 ± 5.7 min. Fluoroscopy-guided urethral catheterization is a safe and efficient alternative in patients where blind or cystoscopy-assisted urethral catheterization has failed or when cystoscopy-urethral catheterization cannot be performed.

摘要

这项回顾性研究评估了在盲目导尿或膀胱镜辅助导尿失败的患者中,透视引导下尿道插管的安全性和有效性。我们利用了2011年1月至2023年3月期间我们机构的数据库,纳入了盲目导尿或膀胱镜辅助导尿失败并随后接受透视引导下尿道插管的患者。将一根5F导管插入尿道口,并进行逆行尿道造影(RGU)。随后,操作人员试图将一根亲水导丝插入尿道。如果导丝和引导导管能够成功插入膀胱,但由于尿道狭窄尿道导管无法插入,操作人员根据自己的偏好决定要么尝试使用直径更小的导管再次插入,要么进行球囊扩张。最后,选择合适尺寸的尿道导管,并用18号针制作一个端孔。然后将导管沿导丝插入,将尖端置于膀胱腔内并充盈球囊以固定导管。我们回顾了患者的病史、血尿情况和RGU,以确定尿道异常。评估了与操作相关的数据。该研究共纳入了149例患者(均为男性;平均年龄73.3±13.3岁)的179次透视引导下尿道插管。141例患者共确诊225处尿道狭窄,8例患者无狭窄。62例患者确诊尿道破裂,34例患者在盲目导尿或膀胱镜辅助导尿失败后出现血尿。技术成功率和临床成功率均为100%,4例患者(2.2%)出现了与操作相关的并发症。从申请到插入尿道导管的平均时间为129.7±127.8分钟。平均总透视时间为3.5±2.5分钟,平均总剂量面积乘积(DAP)为25.4±25.1 Gy cm。77例患者进行了球囊扩张。总操作时间为9.2±7.6分钟,无球囊扩张的平均操作时间为7.1±5.7分钟。对于盲目导尿或膀胱镜辅助导尿失败或无法进行膀胱镜尿道插管的患者,透视引导下尿道插管是一种安全有效的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/892b/11043067/08ffb61563c6/41598_2024_60224_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验