Suppr超能文献

新加坡外科医生术中不良事件:一项关于影响与支持的多中心横断面研究

Intraoperative adverse events among surgeons in Singapore: a multicentre cross-sectional study on impact and support.

作者信息

Yaow Clyve Yu Leon, Ng Qin Xiang, Chong Ryan Ian Houe, Ong Clarence, Chong Nicolette Zy-Yin, Yap Nicole Li Xian, Hong Ashley Shuen Ying, Tan Benita Kiat Tee, Loh Amos Hong Pheng, Wong Andrew Siang Yih, Tan Hiang Khoon

机构信息

NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10998-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is known that many surgeons encounter intraoperative adverse events which can result in Second Victim Syndrome (SVS), with significant detriment to their emotional and physical health. There is, however, a paucity of Asian studies in this space. The present study thus aimed to explore the degree to which the experience of an adverse event is common among surgeons in Singapore, as well as its impact, and factors affecting their responses and perceived support systems.

METHODS

A self-administered survey was sent to surgeons at four large tertiary hospitals. The 42-item questionnaire used a systematic closed and open approach, to assess: Personal experience with intraoperative adverse events, emotional, psychological and physical impact of these events and perceived support systems.

RESULTS

The response rate was 57.5% (n = 196). Most respondents were male (54.8%), between 35 and 44 years old, and holding the senior consultant position. In the past 12 months alone, 68.9% recalled an adverse event. The emotional impact was significant, including sadness (63.1%), guilt (53.1%) and anxiety (45.4%). Speaking to colleagues was the most helpful support source (66.7%) and almost all surgeons did not receive counselling (93.3%), with the majority deeming it unnecessary (72.2%). Notably, 68.1% of the surgeons had positive takeaways, gaining new insight and improving vigilance towards errors. Both gender and surgeon experience did not affect the likelihood of errors and emotional impact, but more experienced surgeons were less likely to have positive takeaways (p = 0.035). Individuals may become advocates for patient safety, while simultaneously championing the cause of psychological support for others.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative adverse events are prevalent and its emotional impact is significant, regardless of the surgeon's experience or gender. While colleagues and peer discussions are a pillar of support, healthcare institutions should do more to address the impact and ensuing consequences.

摘要

背景

众所周知,许多外科医生在手术中会遭遇不良事件,这可能导致“二次受害者综合征”(SVS),对他们的身心健康造成严重损害。然而,这一领域的亚洲研究较少。因此,本研究旨在探讨不良事件在新加坡外科医生中的常见程度、其影响以及影响他们应对方式和感知支持系统的因素。

方法

向四家大型三级医院的外科医生发送了一份自填式调查问卷。这份包含42个条目的问卷采用系统的封闭式和开放式方法,以评估:术中不良事件的个人经历、这些事件对情绪、心理和身体的影响以及感知支持系统。

结果

回复率为57.5%(n = 196)。大多数受访者为男性(54.8%),年龄在35至44岁之间,担任高级顾问职位。仅在过去12个月中,68.9%的受访者回忆起发生过不良事件。情绪影响显著,包括悲伤(63.1%)、内疚(53.1%)和焦虑(45.4%)。与同事交流是最有帮助的支持来源(66.7%),几乎所有外科医生都没有接受过咨询(93.3%),大多数人认为没有必要(72.2%)。值得注意的是,68.1%的外科医生有积极的收获,获得了新的见解并提高了对错误的警惕性。性别和外科医生经验均不影响出错的可能性和情绪影响,但经验更丰富的外科医生获得积极收获的可能性较小(p = 0.035)。个人可能会成为患者安全的倡导者,同时为他人争取心理支持。

结论

术中不良事件很普遍,其情绪影响显著,与外科医生的经验或性别无关。虽然同事和同行讨论是支持的支柱,但医疗机构应采取更多措施来应对其影响及后续后果。

相似文献

2
The Surgeon as the Second Victim? Results of the Boston Intraoperative Adverse Events Surgeons' Attitude (BISA) Study.
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Jun;224(6):1048-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.039. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
3
Scoping review of the second victim syndrome among surgeons: Understanding the impact, responses, and support systems.
Am J Surg. 2024 Mar;229:5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.045. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
4
Surgical Catastrophe. Supporting the Gynecologic Surgeon after an Adverse Event.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Nov-Dec;25(7):1117-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 29.
6
The Emotional Impact and Coping Mechanisms Following Adverse Patient Events Among Canadian Vascular Surgeons and Trainees.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Apr;58(3):294-301. doi: 10.1177/15385744231209914. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
7
Surgeon and Surgical Trainee Experiences After Adverse Patient Events.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2414329. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14329.
8
Improving surgeon wellness: The second victim syndrome and quality of care.
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015 Dec;24(6):315-8. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2015.08.011.
9
A cross-sectional survey on nurses' second victim experience and quality of support resources in Singapore.
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Mar;28(2):286-293. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12920. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
10
Peer Support to Promote Surgeon Well-being: The APSA Program Experience.
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Sep;59(9):1665-1671. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.12.022. Epub 2024 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Second Victim Syndrome Among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review of Interventions and Outcomes.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Jun 3;17:225-239. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S526565. eCollection 2025.
3
Understanding the Second Victim Phenomenon Among Healthcare Workers in an Italian Hospital.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Dec 16;14(12):3073-3086. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14120201.
4
Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach.
Int J Public Health. 2024 Aug 30;69:1607428. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Going beyond compliance: A qualitative study of the practice of surgical safety checklist.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Mar;345:116652. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116652. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
2
Scoping review of the second victim syndrome among surgeons: Understanding the impact, responses, and support systems.
Am J Surg. 2024 Mar;229:5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.045. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
3
Validation and use of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool questionnaire: a scoping review.
Public Health. 2023 Oct;223:183-192. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
5
Posttraumatic Growth and Second Victim Distress Resulting From Medical Mishaps Among Physicians and Nurses.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023 Dec;30(4):716-723. doi: 10.1007/s10880-022-09931-3. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
6
The psychological impact of adverse events on urology trainees.
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Aug;192(4):1819-1824. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03202-8. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
Coping and Recovery in Surgical Residents after Adverse Events: The Second Victim Phenomenon.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 22;10(3):e4203. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004203. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
The effect of surgical complications on ENT trainees.
J Laryngol Otol. 2021 Apr;135(4):293-296. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121000797. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Exploring Emotional Responses After Postoperative Complications: A Qualitative Study of Practicing Surgeons.
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e124-e131. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004041.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验