Zhu Yuanye, Hu Jiahui, Ye Weibing, Korivi Mallikarjuna, Qian Yongdong
Institute of Human Movement and Sports Engineering, College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, 321004, Jinhua City, Zhejiang, China.
Ital J Pediatr. 2024 Apr 24;50(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13052-024-01645-6.
The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2) has been used to assess the gross and fine motor skills of children (0-6 years); however, the measurement properties of the PDMS-2 are inconclusive. Here, we aimed to systematically review the measurement properties of PDMS-2, and synthesize the quality of evidence using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurements Instruments (COSMIN) methodology. Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL and MEDLINE, were searched for relevant studies through January 2023; these studies used PDMS-2. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by the COSMIN risk-of-bias checklist, and the measurement properties of PDMS-2 were evaluated by the COSMIN quality criteria. Modified GRADE was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence. We included a total of 22 articles in the assessment. Among the assessed measurement properties, the content validity of PDMS-2 was found to be sufficient with moderate-quality evidence. The structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and interrater reliability of the PDMS-2 were sufficient for high-quality evidence, while the intrarater reliability was sufficient for moderate-quality evidence. Sufficient high-quality evidence was also found for the measurement error of PDMS-2. The overall construct validity of the PDMS-2 was sufficient but showed inconsistent quality of evidence. The responsiveness of PDMS-2 appears to be sufficient with low-quality evidence. Our findings demonstrate that the PDMS-2 has sufficient content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability and measurement error with moderate to high-quality evidence. Therefore, PDMS-2 is graded as 'A' and can be used in motor development research and clinical settings.
皮博迪发育运动量表第二版（PDMS - 2）已被用于评估儿童（0 - 6岁）的粗大运动和精细运动技能；然而，PDMS - 2的测量特性尚无定论。在此，我们旨在系统评价PDMS - 2的测量特性，并使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准（COSMIN）方法综合证据质量。通过检索包括PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库（CINAHL）和医学期刊数据库（MEDLINE）在内的电子数据库，查找截至2023年1月的相关研究；这些研究使用了PDMS - 2。每项研究的方法学质量通过COSMIN偏倚风险清单进行评估，PDMS - 2的测量特性通过COSMIN质量标准进行评价。采用改良的GRADE方法评估证据质量。我们共纳入22篇文章进行评估。在所评估的测量特性中，发现PDMS - 2的内容效度有中等质量证据支持，较为充分。PDMS - 2的结构效度、内部一致性、重测信度和评分者间信度有高质量证据支持，较为充分，而评分者内信度有中等质量证据支持，较为充分。PDMS - 2的测量误差也有充分的高质量证据。PDMS - 2的整体构想效度较为充分，但证据质量不一致。PDMS - 2的反应度有低质量证据支持，似乎较为充分。我们的研究结果表明，PDMS - 2具有充分的内容效度、结构效度、内部一致性、信度和测量误差，证据质量从中等到高质量。因此，PDMS - 2被评为“A”级，可用于运动发育研究和临床环境。
