Suppr超能文献

远程医疗、电子健康与数字健康公平性:一项范围综述

Telemedicine, e-Health, and Digital Health Equity: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Petretto Donatella Rita, Carrogu Gian Pietro, Gaviano Luca, Berti Roberta, Pinna Martina, Petretto Andrea Domenico, Pili Roberto

机构信息

Department of Education, Philosophy and Psychology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari 09124, Italy.

IERFOP Onlus, Via Platone 1/3, Cagliari 09100, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2024 Feb 6;20:e17450179279732. doi: 10.2174/0117450179279732231211110248. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the progressive digitization of people's lives and in the specific healthcare context, the issue of equity in the healthcare domain has extended to digital environments or e-environments, assuming the connotation of "Digital Health Equity" (DHE). Telemedicine and e-Health, which represent the two main e-environments in the healthcare context, have shown great potential in the promotion of health outcomes, but there can be unintended consequences related to the risk of inequalities. In this paper, we aimed to review papers that have investigated the topic of Digital Health Equity in Telemedicine and e-Health [definition(s), advantages, barriers and risk factors, interventions].

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review according to the methodological framework proposed in PRISMA-ScR guidelines on the relationship between Digital Health Equity and Telemedicine and e-Health Scopus and Pubmed electronic databases. The following inclusion criteria were established: papers on the relationship between Digital Health Equity and Telemedicine and/or e-Health, written in English, and having no time limits. All study designs were eligible, including those that have utilized qualitative and quantitative methods, methodology, or guidelines reports, except for meta-reviews.

RESULTS

Regarding Digital Health Equity in Telemedicine and e-Health, even if there is no unique definition, there is a general agreement on the idea that it is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon. When promoting Digital Health Equity, some people may incur some risk/s of inequities and/or they may meet some obstacles. Regarding intervention, some authors have proposed a specific field/level of intervention, while other authors have discussed multidimensional interventions based on interdependence among the different levels and the mutually reinforcing effects between all of them.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the present paper has discussed Digital Health Equity in Telemedicine and e-Health. Promoting equity of access to healthcare is a significant challenge in contemporary times and in the near future. While on the one hand, the construct "equity" applied to the health context highlights the importance of creating and sustaining the conditions to allow anyone to be able to reach (and develop) their "health potential", it also raises numerous questions on "how this can happen". An overall and integrated picture of all the variables that promote DHE is needed, taking into account the interdependence among the different levels and the mutually reinforcing effects between all of them.

摘要

背景

随着人们生活的逐步数字化,在特定的医疗保健背景下,医疗保健领域的公平问题已扩展到数字环境或电子环境,具有了“数字健康公平”(DHE)的内涵。远程医疗和电子健康是医疗保健背景下的两个主要电子环境,在促进健康结果方面显示出巨大潜力,但可能会产生与不平等风险相关的意外后果。在本文中,我们旨在回顾研究远程医疗和电子健康中数字健康公平主题的论文[定义、优势、障碍和风险因素、干预措施]。

方法

我们根据PRISMA-ScR指南中提出的方法框架,对数字健康公平与远程医疗和电子健康之间的关系进行了范围综述,检索了Scopus和Pubmed电子数据库。制定了以下纳入标准:关于数字健康公平与远程医疗和/或电子健康之间关系的论文,英文撰写,无时间限制。所有研究设计均符合条件,包括那些采用定性和定量方法、方法论或指南报告的研究,但元综述除外。

结果

关于远程医疗和电子健康中的数字健康公平,即使没有唯一的定义,但人们普遍认为这是一个复杂的多维度现象。在促进数字健康公平时,有些人可能会面临一些不平等风险和/或遇到一些障碍。关于干预措施,一些作者提出了特定的干预领域/层面,而其他作者则讨论了基于不同层面之间的相互依存关系以及它们之间的相互强化作用的多维度干预措施。

结论

总之,本文讨论了远程医疗和电子健康中的数字健康公平。促进医疗保健服务的公平获取在当代和不久的将来都是一项重大挑战。一方面,应用于健康背景的“公平”概念凸显了创造和维持条件以使任何人都能够实现(并发展)其“健康潜力”的重要性,但它也引发了关于“如何实现这一点”的诸多问题。需要全面综合地了解所有促进数字健康公平的变量,同时考虑不同层面之间的相互依存关系以及它们之间的相互强化作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5918/11041391/a34983f5a237/CPEMH-20-E17450179279732_F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验