Suppr超能文献

西班牙助产士预防和修复产科会阴创伤的方法。

Midwives' approach to the prevention and repair of obstetric perineal trauma in Spain.

作者信息

Laderas Díaz Estíbaliz, Rodríguez-Almagro Julián, Picón Rodríguez Rafael, Martínez Galiano Juan Miguel, Martínez Rodríguez Sandra, Hernández-Martínez Antonio

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, La Mancha Centro General Hospital, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain.

Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Ciudad Real Faculty of Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2024 Apr;11(4):e2160. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2160.

Abstract

AIM

Different clinical practice guidelines include recommendations on how to prevent and repair obstetric perineal trauma, as well as the use of episiotomy. To evaluate the variability in midwives' professional practices for preventing and repairing perineal trauma, as well as the professional factors that may be associated with the restrictive use of episiotomy.

DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Three hundred five midwives completed an anonymous questionnaire developed by the authors and distributed across various midwifery scientific societies. The main outcomes measured were the frequencies of adopting specific practices related to perineal injury prevention and repair, episiotomy technique and restrictive episiotomy use (<10%). Odds ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.

RESULTS

Intrapartum perineal massage was not normally used by 253 (83%) of midwives, and 186 (61%) applied compresses soaked in warm water to the perineum. Regarding episiotomy, there was a great deal of variability, noting that 129 (42.3%) adopted a restrictive use of this procedure, 125 (41%) performed it between 10% and 20%, while 51 midwives (16.7%) performed it in more than 20% of cases. In addition, 165 (54.1%) midwives followed an incision angle of 60º. Concerning tears, 155 (50.8%) usually sutured first-degree tears and 273 (89.5%) always sutured second-degree tears. Midwives attending home births (aOR = 6.5; 95% CI: 2.69-15.69), working at a teaching hospital (aOR = 3.69; 95% CI: 1.39-9.84), and the ones who recently completed their professional training (aOR = 3.58; 95% CI: 1.46-8.79) were significantly more likely to adopt a restrictive use of episiotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant variability in Spanish midwives' practices for preventing and repairing perineal tears. Moreover, the restrictive use of episiotomy is associated with midwives attending home births, working in teaching hospitals and having recent professional training.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

摘要

目的

不同的临床实践指南包含了关于如何预防和修复产科会阴创伤以及会阴切开术使用的建议。旨在评估助产士在预防和修复会阴创伤方面的专业实践差异,以及可能与限制性会阴切开术使用相关的专业因素。

设计

观察性横断面研究。

方法

305名助产士完成了作者编制并分发给各个助产科学会的一份匿名问卷。所测量的主要结果是采用与会阴损伤预防和修复、会阴切开术技术以及限制性会阴切开术使用(<10%)相关的特定做法的频率。估计了比值比(OR)和95%置信区间的调整比值比(aOR)。

结果

253名(83%)助产士通常不进行产时会阴按摩,186名(61%)会将会阴浸泡在温水中。关于会阴切开术,存在很大差异,注意到129名(42.3%)采用限制性使用该手术,125名(41%)在10%至20%的情况下进行,而51名助产士(16.7%)在超过20%的病例中进行。此外,165名(54.1%)助产士采用60°的切口角度。关于撕裂伤,155名(50.8%)通常缝合一度撕裂伤,273名(89.5%)总是缝合二度撕裂伤。在家中接生的助产士(aOR = 6.5;95% CI:2.69 - 15.69)、在教学医院工作的助产士(aOR = 3.69;95% CI:1.39 - 9.84)以及最近完成专业培训的助产士(aOR = 3.58;95% CI:1.46 - 8.79)更有可能采用限制性会阴切开术。

结论

西班牙助产士在预防和修复会阴撕裂伤的实践中存在显著差异。此外,限制性会阴切开术的使用与在家中接生、在教学医院工作以及最近接受专业培训的助产士有关。

患者或公众贡献

无患者或公众贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec11/11043828/2c0c4c390adf/NOP2-11-e2160-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验