Silveira Neves Gabriela, Silveira Nogueira Reis Zilma, Maia de Castro Romanelli Roberta, Dos Santos Nascimento Jannine, Dias Sanglard André, Batchelor James
Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences: Child and Adolescent Health - PPGSCA, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Sofia Feldman Hospital, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2338633. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2338633. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Access to diagnostic tools like chest radiography (CXR) is challenging in resource-limited areas. Despite reduced reliance on CXR due to the need for quick clinical decisions, its usage remains prevalent in the approach to neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS).
To assess CXR's role in diagnosing and grading NRDS severity compared to current clinical features and laboratory standards.
A review of studies with NRDS diagnostic criteria was conducted across six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BVS, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science, Cochrane) up to 3 March 2023. Independent reviewers selected studies, with discrepancies resolved by a senior reviewer. Data were organised into descriptive tables to highlight the use of CXR and clinical indicators of NRDS.
Out of 1,686 studies screened, 23 were selected, involving a total of 2,245 newborns. All selected studies used CXR to diagnose NRDS, and 21 (91%) applied it to assess disease severity. While seven reports (30%) indicated that CXR is irreplaceable by other diagnostic tools for NRDS diagnosis, 10 studies (43%) found that alternative methods surpassed CXR in several respects, such as severity assessment, monitoring progress, predicting the need for surfactant therapy, foreseeing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure failure, anticipating intubation requirements, and aiding in differential diagnosis.
CXR remains an important diagnostic tool for NRDS. Despite its continued use in scientific reports, the findings suggest that the study's outcomes may not fully reflect the current global clinical practices, especially in low-resource settings where the early NRDS approach remains a challenge for neonatal survival. PROSPERO number CRD42022336480.
在资源有限的地区,获取胸部X线摄影(CXR)等诊断工具具有挑战性。尽管由于需要快速做出临床决策而减少了对CXR的依赖,但在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的诊断中,其使用仍然普遍。
评估与当前临床特征和实验室标准相比,CXR在诊断NRDS及评估其严重程度分级方面的作用。
截至2023年3月3日,对六个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、BVS、Scopus - Elsevier、Web of Science、Cochrane)中符合NRDS诊断标准的研究进行了综述。由独立评审员筛选研究,如有分歧则由高级评审员解决。数据整理成描述性表格,以突出CXR的使用情况和NRDS的临床指标。
在筛选的1686项研究中,选择了23项,共涉及2245名新生儿。所有入选研究均使用CXR诊断NRDS,其中21项(91%)将其用于评估疾病严重程度。虽然七篇报告(30%)指出CXR在NRDS诊断中不可被其他诊断工具替代,但10项研究(43%)发现替代方法在几个方面超过了CXR,如严重程度评估、监测病情进展、预测表面活性剂治疗需求、预见持续气道正压通气失败、预测插管需求以及辅助鉴别诊断。
CXR仍然是NRDS的重要诊断工具。尽管其在科学报告中仍被持续使用,但研究结果表明,该研究的结果可能无法完全反映当前的全球临床实践,特别是在资源匮乏地区,早期NRDS的诊断方法仍然是新生儿生存面临的挑战。国际前瞻性系统评价注册编号CRD42022336480。