Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopedics (Friedrichsheim), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt / Main, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec;144(12):5093-5100. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05240-6. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Options for soft tissue coverage in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) range from primary wound closure to complex muscle flap reconstructions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the institutional experience of wound coverage options for complex soft tissue defects in rTKA.
77 patients undergoing rTKA with complex wound closure by a single plastic surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. The average follow-up was 30.1 months. In 18 (23.4%) patients, an intraoperative decision for primary closure was made. Fifty-nine patients (76.6%) received either a local fasciocutaneous (N = 18), a medial gastrocnemius (N = 37), a free latissimus dorsi (N = 3) or a lateral gastrocnemius flap (N = 1). Revision-free survival and complication rates were assessed and risk factors were analyzed with Cox-regression analysis.
Medial gastrocnemius flaps had significant lower cumulative revision-free survival rates than local fasciocutaneous flaps (P = 0.021) and primary closures (P < 0.001) (42.5% vs. 71.5% vs. 100%,respectively). Comparing the most common complex closure procedures medial gastrocnemius flaps had the highest rate of prolonged wound healing (29.7%) and infection/reinfection (40.5%). Infection-associated flap procedures had significant lower cumulative revision-free survival rates (30.5%) than non-infection associated flap procedures (62.8%,P = 0.047). A history of more than two prior surgeries (HR = 6.11,P < 0.001) and an age ≥ 65 years (HR = 0.30,P = 0.018) significantly increased the risk of revision.
The results of this study indicate that primary closure -if possible- should be preferred to early proactive muscle flap coverage. Even in the hands of an experienced plastic surgeon muscle flaps have high revision and complication rates. The study highlights the need to clarify flap indications and to investigate alternative approaches.
在翻修全膝关节置换术(rTKA)中,软组织覆盖的选择范围从初次伤口闭合到复杂的肌肉皮瓣重建。本研究的目的是探讨复杂软组织缺损 rTKA 中伤口覆盖选择的机构经验。
回顾性分析了由一位整形外科医生进行 rTKA 并进行复杂伤口闭合的 77 例患者。平均随访 30.1 个月。18 例(23.4%)患者术中决定行一期闭合。59 例患者(76.6%)接受了局部筋膜皮瓣(N=18)、内侧比目鱼肌皮瓣(N=37)、游离背阔肌皮瓣(N=3)或外侧比目鱼肌皮瓣(N=1)。评估了无翻修生存率和并发症发生率,并通过 Cox 回归分析分析了风险因素。
内侧比目鱼肌皮瓣的累积无翻修生存率明显低于局部筋膜皮瓣(P=0.021)和初次闭合(P<0.001)(分别为 42.5%、71.5%和 100%)。比较最常见的复杂闭合程序,内侧比目鱼肌皮瓣的伤口愈合延长(29.7%)和感染/再感染(40.5%)发生率最高。与感染相关的皮瓣手术的累积无翻修生存率明显低于非感染相关的皮瓣手术(62.8%,P=0.047)。既往手术次数多于两次(HR=6.11,P<0.001)和年龄≥65 岁(HR=0.30,P=0.018)显著增加了翻修风险。
本研究结果表明,如果可能,应首选一期闭合,而不是早期积极的肌肉皮瓣覆盖。即使在经验丰富的整形外科医生手中,肌肉皮瓣的翻修和并发症发生率也很高。该研究强调需要明确皮瓣适应证,并研究替代方法。