Suppr超能文献

亚阈值微脉冲激光联合抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Subthreshold micropulse laser combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct;262(10):3073-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06460-7. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in addition to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for studies that compared anti-VEGF with SML and anti-VEGF monotherapy for DME. Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and the number of anti-VEGF injections.

RESULTS

Eight studies including 493 eyes were selected. Four studies were randomized controlled, and the other four were retrospective. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in BCVA (mean difference [MD] -0.04; 95%CI -0.09 to 0.01 logMAR; P = 0.13;). CMT was thinner in the group of anti-VEGF with SML (MD -11.08; 95%CI -21.04 to -1.12 µm; P = 0.03); however, it was due to a single study that weighed higher, and the sensitivity and subcategory analyses did not support the finding. The number of anti-VEGF injections was significantly decreased in the group of anti-VEGF with SML (MD -2.22; 95%CI -3.02 to -1.42; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence indicates that adding SML to anti-VEGF therapy could significantly reduce the number of anti-VEGF injections compared to anti-VEGF monotherapy, while achieve similar BCVA and CMT.

摘要

目的

评估亚阈微脉冲激光(SML)联合抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的效果。

方法

系统检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,以比较抗 VEGF 联合 SML 与抗 VEGF 单药治疗 DME 的研究。主要观察指标为最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中央黄斑厚度(CMT)和抗 VEGF 注射次数。

结果

共纳入 8 项研究、493 只眼。其中 4 项为随机对照研究,4 项为回顾性研究。Meta 分析结果显示,两组患者的 BCVA 差异无统计学意义(平均差值 [MD] -0.04;95%置信区间 [CI] -0.09 至 0.01 logMAR;P=0.13)。抗 VEGF 联合 SML 组的 CMT 更薄(MD -11.08;95%CI -21.04 至 -1.12 μm;P=0.03),但这是由于一项权重较高的研究导致,敏感性和亚组分析并不支持这一发现。抗 VEGF 联合 SML 组的抗 VEGF 注射次数明显减少(MD -2.22;95%CI -3.02 至 -1.42;P<0.0001)。

结论

现有证据表明,与抗 VEGF 单药治疗相比,SML 联合抗 VEGF 治疗可显著减少抗 VEGF 注射次数,同时获得相似的 BCVA 和 CMT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验