Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense.
Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;100(8):e1624-e1629. doi: 10.1111/aos.15196. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
To evaluate treatment efficacy in diabetic macular oedema (DME) comparing a study population receiving combined intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition and focal/grid photocoagulation with a matched, real-world population receiving standard of care treatment.
In an exploratory study, we included 43 eyes from 32 patients from a previously published study as well as 46 eyes from 38 standard-of-care patients. The study population had received a loading dose of three monthly aflibercept injections followed by focal/grid photocoagulation and additional aflibercept pro re nata. Principal measurements at 12 months were numbers of intravitreal injections, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT).
At baseline, there were no differences between groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, haemoglobin A C, systolic pressure or type of diabetes, but the study population had a higher diastolic pressure (81.6 versus 72.1 mmHg, p = 0.03) and a lower duration of diabetes (12.3 versus 23.2 years, p = 0.03). At month 12, patients in the study group had a higher visual acuity (79.6 versus 74.3 ETDRS letters, p = 0.03), despite having received fewer aflibercept injections (4.4 versus 5.9, p < 0.01) with a higher likelihood of having only received the three mandatory injections in the loading phase (39.5% versus 13.0%, p = 0.01).
In comparison to a matched, real-world DME-population, patients in combined treatment with intravitreal aflibercept and postloading focal/grid photocoagulation obtained a better functional outcome despite having received fewer intravitreal injections. Future randomized studies are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this combined treatment regimen.
评估接受玻璃体腔内血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)联合抑制和局灶/格栅光凝治疗的研究人群与接受标准治疗的匹配真实世界人群的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)治疗效果。
在一项探索性研究中,我们纳入了先前发表的研究中的 32 名患者的 43 只眼和标准治疗患者的 38 名患者的 46 只眼。研究人群接受了三次每月阿柏西普注射负荷剂量,随后进行局灶/格栅光凝和阿柏西普按需治疗。主要测量指标为 12 个月时的玻璃体腔内注射次数、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心视网膜厚度(CRT)。
在基线时,两组在年龄、性别、体重指数、糖化血红蛋白 A C、收缩压或糖尿病类型方面无差异,但研究人群的舒张压较高(81.6 与 72.1mmHg,p=0.03),糖尿病病程较短(12.3 与 23.2 年,p=0.03)。在第 12 个月时,研究组患者的视力较好(79.6 与 74.3 ETDRS 字母,p=0.03),尽管接受的阿柏西普注射次数较少(4.4 与 5.9,p<0.01),并且在负荷期更有可能仅接受三次强制性注射(39.5%与 13.0%,p=0.01)。
与匹配的真实世界 DME 人群相比,接受玻璃体腔内阿柏西普联合负荷后局灶/格栅光凝治疗的患者尽管接受的玻璃体腔内注射次数较少,但获得了更好的功能结果。需要进行未来的随机研究来评估这种联合治疗方案的长期疗效。