Kuriyama Akira, Watanabe Shinichi, Katayama Yukiko, Yasaka Taisuke, Ouchi Akira, Iida Yuki, Kasai Fumihito
Emergency and Critical Care Center, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan. ak.bellyrub+
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gifu University of Health Science, Gifu, Japan.
Dysphagia. 2024 Dec;39(6):1171-1182. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10700-7. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Dysphagia or swallowing dysfunction is common in patients with acute or critical illness, and diverse methods of dysphagia rehabilitation are provided worldwide. We aimed to examine the efficacy of rehabilitation to treat dysphagia in patients with acute or critical illness. We searched PubMed, ICHUSHI, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to November 22, 2023 for relevant randomized controlled trials. We focused on dysphagic patients with acute or critical illness who were not orotracheally intubated. Our target intervention included conventional rehabilitation and nerve stimulation/neuromodulation techniques as dysphagia rehabilitation. Comparators were conventional or standard care or no dysphagia interventions. Primary outcomes included mortality, incidence of pneumonia during the study period, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores within 90 days of hospital discharge. We pooled the data using a random-effects model, and classified the certainty of evidence based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Nineteen randomized controlled trials involving 1,096 participants were included. Dysphagia rehabilitation was associated with a reduced incidence of pneumonia (risk ratio [RR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.81; moderate certainty), but not with reduced mortality (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.61-1.39; very low certainty) or improved HRQoL scores (mean difference, -0.20; 95% CI, -20.34 to 19.94; very low certainty). Based on the available moderate- or very low- quality evidence, while dysphagia rehabilitation had no impact on mortality or HRQoL, they might reduce the incidence of pneumonia in dysphagic patients with acute or critical illness.
吞咽困难或吞咽功能障碍在急性或危重症患者中很常见,全球提供了多种吞咽困难康复方法。我们旨在研究康复治疗对急性或危重症患者吞咽困难的疗效。我们检索了PubMed、ICHUSHI和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库数据库,从数据库建立至2023年11月22日,以查找相关随机对照试验。我们关注的是未进行口气管插管的急性或危重症吞咽困难患者。我们的目标干预措施包括将传统康复以及神经刺激/神经调节技术作为吞咽困难康复方法。对照措施为传统或标准护理或不进行吞咽困难干预。主要结局包括死亡率、研究期间肺炎的发生率以及出院90天内的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)评分。我们使用随机效应模型汇总数据,并根据推荐分级、评估、制定和评价系统对证据的确定性进行分类。纳入了19项涉及1096名参与者的随机对照试验。吞咽困难康复与肺炎发生率降低相关(风险比[RR],0.66;95%置信区间[CI],0.54 - 0.81;中等确定性),但与死亡率降低无关(RR,0.92;95%CI,0.61 - 1.39;极低确定性)或HRQoL评分改善无关(平均差,-0.20;95%CI,-20.34至19.94;极低确定性)。基于现有的中等质量或极低质量证据,虽然吞咽困难康复对死亡率或HRQoL没有影响,但可能会降低急性或危重症吞咽困难患者的肺炎发生率。