Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jul 15;357:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.091. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address the limited generalizability of studies on defense mechanisms in depression by comparing depressive individuals with non-clinical controls (aim a) and examining changes throughout psychological interventions (aim b) (PROSPERO CRD42023442620).
We followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed/Web of Science/(EBSCO)PsycINFO until 13/04/2023 for studies evaluating defense mechanisms with measures based on the hierarchical model in depressive patients versus non-clinical controls or throughout psychological intervention. We conducted random-effect meta-analyses for mature defenses/non-mature (neurotic/immature) defenses/overall defensive functioning (ODF), with standardized mean difference (SMD) as outcome measure metric. Meta-regression/sub-group/sensitivity analyses were conducted. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and certainty of evidence for aim b outcomes was evaluated using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations).
18 studies were included (mean NOS score = 5.56). Depressive patients used significantly more non-mature defenses than non-clinical controls (SMD = 0.74; k = 13). Non-clinical controls did not significantly differ in use of mature defenses compared to depressive patients (SMD = 0.33; k = 14). Significant moderators were publication year/NOS score/geographical distribution/mean age for non-mature defenses and NOS score/geographical distribution for mature defenses. Throughout psychological interventions, only ODF significantly increased (SMD = 0.55; k = 2) (GRADE = very low).
Quality of many studies was medium/sub-optimal, and longitudinal studies were scarce.
Individuals with depressive disorders show a high use of non-mature defenses that could be assessed and targeted in psychological interventions, especially in younger patients.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在解决抑郁防御机制研究的普遍局限性,通过比较抑郁个体与非临床对照(目的 a),并检查心理干预过程中的变化(目的 b),来达到这一目的(PROSPERO CRD42023442620)。
我们遵循 PRISMA 2020 指南,从 PubMed/Web of Science/(EBSCO)PsycINFO 中检索了截至 2023 年 4 月 13 日的研究,这些研究使用基于抑郁患者与非临床对照者之间分层模型的测量方法评估防御机制,或在整个心理干预过程中评估防御机制。我们对成熟防御/非成熟(神经症/不成熟)防御/整体防御功能(ODF)进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以标准化均数差(SMD)作为效应量测量指标。进行了元回归/亚组/敏感性分析。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估研究质量,并使用 GRADE(推荐评估、制定与评价)评估目的 b 结果的证据确定性。
共纳入 18 项研究(平均 NOS 评分为 5.56)。与非临床对照者相比,抑郁患者使用非成熟防御机制的比例显著更高(SMD=0.74;k=13)。非临床对照者与抑郁患者相比,在使用成熟防御机制方面没有显著差异(SMD=0.33;k=14)。非成熟防御机制的显著调节因素为发表年份/NOS 评分/地理分布/平均年龄,而成熟防御机制的显著调节因素为 NOS 评分/地理分布。在整个心理干预过程中,只有 ODF 显著增加(SMD=0.55;k=2)(GRADE=极低)。
许多研究的质量为中等/较差,且纵向研究较少。
抑郁障碍患者表现出较高水平的非成熟防御机制,这些防御机制可以在心理干预中进行评估和针对治疗,尤其是在年轻患者中。