Di Giuseppe Mariagrazia, Aafjes-van Doorn Katie, Békés Vera, Gorman Bernard S, Stukenberg Karl, Waldron Sherwood
Department of History, Humanities, and Society, University of Rome Tor Vergata.
Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA; Faculty of Arts and Sciences, New York University Shanghai.
Res Psychother. 2024 Aug 23;27(2):797. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2024.797.
Research into defensive functioning in psychotherapy has thus far focused on patients' defense use. However, also the defensive functioning of therapists might be significant because of its potential in promoting changes in the patient's overall defensive functioning by sharing their higher-level understanding of a given situation and letting the patient have the opportunity to learn how to cope more successfully. This exploratory case study is the first to examine therapist's defense mechanisms and their relationship to changes in the patient's defensive functioning evaluated at different times throughout psychoanalytic treatment. We assessed the use of defense mechanisms with the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales in 20 sessions collected at three phases (early, middle and late) of the psychoanalytic treatment. For each session, we identified therapist's and patient's defenses, defense levels and overall defensive functioning, with particular attention to the sequence of consecutively activated defenses within the therapeutic dyad. Results showed that the patient's defensive functioning tended to gradually improve over the course of the treatment, with a slight decrease at the end. Therapists' overall defensive functioning remained stable throughout the treatment with values in the range of high-neurotic and mature defenses. Assessment of the dyadic interaction between therapist and patient's use of defenses showed that within-session, the patient tended to use the same individual defenses that the therapist used, which was especially pronounced in the initial phases of the treatment. Towards the end of the treatment, once there was a stable shared knowledge, the patient started to explore using new, higher-level defenses on her own, independent from what defenses the therapist used. Our findings emphasized the analyst's role in encouraging the development of more effective ways of coping in the patient, confirming previous theoretical and empirical research regarding the improvement of patient's defensive functioning in psychotherapy. The alterations in these coping strategies, also called high-adaptive defenses, as part of the therapist-patient interaction demonstrate the importance of studying defenses as an excellent process-based outcome measure. The measurement of the degree to which the analyst models and illustrates these superior coping methods to the patient is a prime vehicle for supporting internalization of these skills by the patient.
迄今为止,心理治疗中防御功能的研究主要集中在患者的防御方式上。然而,治疗师的防御功能也可能很重要,因为它有可能通过分享对特定情况的更高级理解,让患者有机会学习如何更成功地应对,从而促进患者整体防御功能的改变。这项探索性案例研究首次考察了治疗师的防御机制及其与精神分析治疗不同阶段评估的患者防御功能变化之间的关系。我们在精神分析治疗的三个阶段(早期、中期和晚期)收集的20次治疗中,使用防御机制评定量表评估防御机制的使用情况。对于每次治疗,我们确定了治疗师和患者的防御方式、防御水平和整体防御功能,特别关注治疗二元组中连续激活的防御序列。结果表明,患者的防御功能在治疗过程中趋于逐渐改善,在治疗结束时略有下降。治疗师的整体防御功能在整个治疗过程中保持稳定,处于高神经质和成熟防御范围内。对治疗师和患者防御方式使用之间的二元互动评估表明,在治疗过程中,患者倾向于使用与治疗师相同的个体防御方式,这在治疗的初始阶段尤为明显。在治疗接近尾声时,一旦有了稳定的共同认知,患者开始独立探索使用新的、更高级的防御方式,而不依赖于治疗师使用的防御方式。我们的研究结果强调了分析师在鼓励患者发展更有效的应对方式方面的作用,证实了之前关于心理治疗中患者防御功能改善的理论和实证研究。这些应对策略的改变,也称为高适应性防御,作为治疗师-患者互动的一部分,表明将防御作为一种基于过程的优秀结果指标进行研究的重要性。衡量分析师向患者示范和阐释这些卓越应对方法的程度,是支持患者将这些技能内化的主要手段。