• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

索利那新联合生物反馈治疗儿童膀胱过度活动症的疗效及安全性。

Efficacy and safety of solifenacin combined with biofeedback in children with overactive bladder.

机构信息

The Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, No 20 Third Section, Renmin Nan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.

Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01486-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-024-01486-9
PMID:38664686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11044419/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Overactive bladder is a common chronic urological disorder in children, liable to impact normal social activities, disrupt sleep and even impair self-esteem. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of solifenacin combined with biofeedback for paediatric overactive bladder.

METHOD

Forty-five children with overactive bladder were enrolled and divided into three groups: 15 patients in Group A were treated with solifenacin, 15 cases in Group B with biofeedback, and the other 15 patients in Group C with the combination of solifenacin plus biofeedback. Each group was subdivided into the non-urge incontinence (non-UI) and urge incontinence (UI) groups. The remission rates were compared among the three groups at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks from the beginning of treatment. The side effects of solifenacin were recorded and followed up.

RESULT

After 2 weeks since initial treatment, the complete response rates were 33.3% (5/15), 20.0% (3/15), and 53.3% (8/15) in the three groups. At 4 weeks, the complete remission rates were 46.7% (7/15), 33.3% (5/15), and 60.0% (9/15) respectively. Moreover, the complete remission rates of the UI groups were higher than the non-UI groups (p < 0.05). At 8 weeks, the complete response rates were 53.3% (8/15), 40.0% (6/15), and 67.7% (10/15). At 12 weeks, the complete response rates were 67.8% (10/15), 60.0% (9/15), and 86.7% (13/15). The complete response rates were higher and urodynamic parameters were improved obviously in group C than the other two groups (p < 0.05) during the follow-ups. The median voiding frequency decreased and median functional bladder capacity increased obviously in Group C after 4 weeks (p < 0.05). Dry mouth was observed in 2 patients (4.4%). 2 patients experienced constipation (4.4%), and neither case was severe. The symptoms of these four patients had relieved by reducing the dose of solifenacin.

CONCLUSION

Solifenacin combined with biofeedback had good efficacy and compliance for children experiencing overactive bladder. It took only 2 weeks to achieve the complete response rate over 50%, especially for the improvement of UI symptoms.

摘要

背景

膀胱过度活动症是儿童常见的慢性泌尿系统疾病,容易影响正常的社会活动、破坏睡眠甚至损害自尊心。我们旨在评估索利那新联合生物反馈治疗儿童膀胱过度活动症的疗效和安全性。

方法

共纳入 45 例膀胱过度活动症患儿,分为三组:A 组 15 例采用索利那新治疗,B 组 15 例采用生物反馈治疗,C 组 15 例采用索利那新联合生物反馈治疗。每组均分为非急迫性尿失禁(非 UI)和急迫性尿失禁(UI)亚组。治疗开始后 2、4、8 和 12 周比较三组的缓解率。记录索利那新的不良反应并进行随访。

结果

治疗开始后 2 周,三组完全缓解率分别为 33.3%(5/15)、20.0%(3/15)和 53.3%(8/15)。治疗 4 周后,三组完全缓解率分别为 46.7%(7/15)、33.3%(5/15)和 60.0%(9/15),UI 组的完全缓解率均高于非 UI 组(p<0.05)。治疗 8 周后,三组完全缓解率分别为 53.3%(8/15)、40.0%(6/15)和 67.7%(10/15)。治疗 12 周后,三组完全缓解率分别为 67.8%(10/15)、60.0%(9/15)和 86.7%(13/15)。随访期间,C 组的完全缓解率更高,尿动力学参数改善更明显(p<0.05)。C 组治疗 4 周后排尿频率中位数降低,功能性膀胱容量中位数增加明显(p<0.05)。有 2 例(4.4%)患者出现口干,2 例(4.4%)患者出现便秘,但均不严重。减少索利那新剂量后,这 4 例患者的症状均缓解。

结论

索利那新联合生物反馈治疗儿童膀胱过度活动症疗效好、依从性高,完全缓解率超过 50%仅需 2 周,尤其对改善 UI 症状效果显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a9/11044419/52a3b2e439b8/12894_2024_1486_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a9/11044419/52a3b2e439b8/12894_2024_1486_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a9/11044419/52a3b2e439b8/12894_2024_1486_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of solifenacin combined with biofeedback in children with overactive bladder.索利那新联合生物反馈治疗儿童膀胱过度活动症的疗效及安全性。
BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01486-9.
2
Efficacy and safety of combinations of mirabegron and solifenacin compared with monotherapy and placebo in patients with overactive bladder (SYNERGY study).米拉贝隆与索利那新联合用药对比单药治疗及安慰剂治疗对膀胱过度活动症患者的疗效和安全性(协同研究)
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):562-575. doi: 10.1111/bju.13882. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
3
Solifenacin in Children and Adolescents with Overactive Bladder: Results of a Phase 3 Randomised Clinical Trial.索利那新治疗儿童和青少年膀胱过度活动症:3 期随机临床试验结果。
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):483-490. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.061. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
4
Combination treatment with mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder: efficacy and safety results from a randomised, double-blind, dose-ranging, phase 2 study (Symphony).米拉贝隆与索利那新联合治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、剂量范围、2 期研究(Symphony)的结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):577-88. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
5
The translation and validation of Chinese overactive bladder symptom score for assessing overactive bladder syndrome and response to solifenacin treatment.用于评估膀胱过度活动症及索利那新治疗反应的中国膀胱过度活动症症状评分的翻译与验证
J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Aug;113(8):506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.07.044. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
6
Mirabegron versus Solifenacin in Children with Overactive Bladder: Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.米拉贝隆与索利那新治疗儿童膀胱过度活动症的前瞻性随机单盲对照试验
Urol Int. 2021;105(11-12):1011-1017. doi: 10.1159/000515992. Epub 2021 May 19.
7
Efficacy and safety of solifenacin succinate tablets versus solifenacin succinate tablets with local estrogen for the treatment of overactive bladder in postmenopausal women--a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled comparison study.琥珀酸索利那新片与含局部雌激素的琥珀酸索利那新片治疗绝经后女性膀胱过度活动症的疗效与安全性——一项多中心、随机、开放标签、对照比较研究
Menopause. 2016 Apr;23(4):451-7. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000574.
8
Safety and efficacy of mirabegron as 'add-on' therapy in patients with overactive bladder treated with solifenacin: a post-marketing, open-label study in Japan (MILAI study).米拉贝隆作为索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的“附加”疗法的安全性和有效性:日本的一项上市后开放标签研究(MILAI研究)。
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116(4):612-22. doi: 10.1111/bju.13068. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
9
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Solifenacin in Children and Adolescents with Overactive Bladder.索利那新治疗儿童和青少年膀胱过度活动症的长期安全性和疗效。
J Urol. 2017 Oct;198(4):928-936. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.05.038. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of treatment with mirabegron compared with solifenacin in the management of overactive bladder syndrome: A retrospective analysis.米拉贝隆与索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动症的疗效及耐受性比较:一项回顾性分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Mar;44(3):524-531. doi: 10.1111/jog.13541. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical guidelines of UTIs in children: quality appraisal with AGREE II and recommendations analysis.儿童尿路感染临床指南:AGREE II 质量评估与推荐意见分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 27;12(4):e057736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057736.
2
Long-term efficacy and safety of solifenacin in pediatric patients aged 6 months to 18 years with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: results from two phase 3 prospective open-label studies.索利那新用于6个月至18岁神经源性逼尿肌过度活动儿科患者的长期疗效和安全性:两项3期前瞻性开放标签研究的结果
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Apr;16(2):180.e1-180.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.12.012. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
3
Diagnosis and Management of Bladder Dysfunction in Neurologically Normal Children.
神经功能正常儿童膀胱功能障碍的诊断与管理
Front Pediatr. 2019 Jul 25;7:298. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00298. eCollection 2019.
4
Efficacy and Tolerability of Solifenacin 5 mg Fixed Dose in Korean Children with Newly Diagnosed Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: a Multicenter Prospective Study.索利那新5毫克固定剂量对韩国新诊断的特发性膀胱过度活动症儿童的疗效和耐受性:一项多中心前瞻性研究
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Feb;32(2):329-334. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.2.329.
5
Solifenacin in Children and Adolescents with Overactive Bladder: Results of a Phase 3 Randomised Clinical Trial.索利那新治疗儿童和青少年膀胱过度活动症:3 期随机临床试验结果。
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):483-490. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.061. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
Overactive bladder in children.儿童过度活动膀胱。
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Sep;13(9):520-32. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.152. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
7
The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: Update report from the standardization committee of the International Children's Continence Society.儿童和青少年下尿路功能术语标准化:国际儿童尿控协会标准化委员会的更新报告
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Apr;35(4):471-81. doi: 10.1002/nau.22751. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
8
Comparison of biofeedback therapy in children with treatment-refractory dysfunctional voiding and overactive bladder.生物反馈疗法在治疗难治性功能性排尿障碍和膀胱过度活动症儿童中的比较
Urology. 2015 Apr;85(4):900-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.031. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
9
Multi-center randomized controlled trial of cognitive treatment, placebo, oxybutynin, bladder training, and pelvic floor training in children with functional urinary incontinence.认知治疗、安慰剂、奥昔布宁、膀胱训练和盆底训练对功能性尿失禁儿童的多中心随机对照试验。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Jun;33(5):482-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.22446. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
10
Anticholinergics for overactive bladder therapy: central nervous system effects.抗胆碱能药物治疗膀胱过度活动症:中枢神经系统作用。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012 Feb;18(2):167-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2011.00248.x. Epub 2011 Feb 16.