National Healthcare Group Polyclinics, 3 Fusionopolis Link, Nexus@one-north, South Tower, # 05-10, Singapore, 138543, Singapore.
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Headquarters & Clinical Sciences Building, 11 Mandalay Road, Level 18, Singapore, 308232, Singapore.
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 25;25(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02368-7.
The prevalence of persons with complex needs in Singapore is rising. Poor understanding of what constitutes complexity impedes the identification of care gaps and development of interventions to improve care for these individuals. We aim to identify the characteristics contributing to complexity in primary care, from the Family Physicians' (FP) perspectives.
Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted from January to September 2021 with experienced FPs across 14 study sites, employing a qualitative descriptive approach based on a complexity framework. Data were coded independently and categorised using thematic analysis by two independent investigators.
Five FGDs were conducted with 18 FPs aged 32 to 57 years old working in different primary care settings, with a mean of 13.5 years of primary care experience. Participants emphasised the need for a unified definition of complexity. Complexity is characterised by the presence of issues spanning across two or more domains (medical, psychological, social or behavioural) that adversely impact medical care and outcomes. Persons with complex needs contrast with persons with medically difficult issues. Medical domain issues include the number of active medical problems, poor chronic disease control, treatment interactions, ill-defined symptoms, management of end-of-life conditions and functional impairment. Psychological domain issues include the presence of mental health conditions or cognitive impairment. Social domain issues include the lack of social support, competing social responsibilities and financial issues, while behavioural domain issues include a lack of trust in healthcare workers, fixed health beliefs and poor health literacy.
Recognising the medical, psychological, social and behavioural factors that contribute to complexity aids in discerning the diverse needs of individuals with complex needs. This underscores the need for additional support in these pertinent areas.
新加坡有复杂需求的人群比例正在上升。由于对复杂性的定义理解不足,导致难以发现护理缺口,并难以制定改善此类人群护理的干预措施。我们旨在从家庭医生的角度确定初级保健中导致复杂性的特征。
2021 年 1 月至 9 月,我们在 14 个研究地点对经验丰富的家庭医生进行了焦点小组讨论(FGD),采用基于复杂性框架的定性描述方法。数据由两名独立研究人员独立编码和分类,使用主题分析。
共进行了 5 次 FGD,参与者为 18 名年龄在 32 至 57 岁之间、在不同初级保健环境中工作的家庭医生,平均具有 13.5 年的初级保健经验。参与者强调需要对复杂性进行统一的定义。复杂性的特征是存在跨越两个或多个领域(医疗、心理、社会或行为)的问题,这些问题对医疗保健和结果产生不利影响。有复杂需求的人与有医疗困难问题的人形成对比。医疗领域的问题包括存在大量活跃的医疗问题、慢性疾病控制不佳、治疗相互作用、定义不明确的症状、终末期疾病的管理和功能障碍。心理领域的问题包括存在心理健康状况或认知障碍。社会领域的问题包括缺乏社会支持、竞争的社会责任和经济问题,而行为领域的问题包括对医疗保健工作者缺乏信任、固定的健康信念和较差的健康素养。
认识到导致复杂性的医疗、心理、社会和行为因素有助于辨别具有复杂需求的个体的不同需求。这凸显了在这些相关领域提供额外支持的必要性。