Hwang Andrew S, Atlas Steven J, Hong Johan, Ashburner Jeffrey M, Zai Adrian H, Grant Richard W, Hong Clemens S
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Gray Bigelow 730, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar;32(3):269-276. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3897-6. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
A better understanding of the attributes of patients who require more effort to manage may improve risk adjustment approaches and lead to more efficient resource allocation, improved patient care and health outcomes, and reduced burnout in primary care clinicians.
To identify and characterize high-effort patients from the physician's perspective.
Cohort study.
Ninety-nine primary care physicians in an academic primary care network.
From a list of 100 randomly selected patients in their panels, PCPs identified patients who required a high level of team-based effort and patients they considered complex. For high-effort patients, PCPs indicated which factors influenced their decision: medical/care coordination, behavioral health, and/or socioeconomic factors. We examined differences in patient characteristics based on PCP-defined effort and complexity.
Among 9594 eligible patients, PCPs classified 2277 (23.7 %) as high-effort and 2676 (27.9 %) as complex. Behavioral health issues were the major driver of effort in younger patients, while medical/care coordination issues predominated in older patients. Compared to low-effort patients, high-effort patients were significantly (P < 0.01 for all) more likely to have higher rates of medical (e.g. 23.2 % vs. 6.3 % for diabetes) and behavioral health problems (e.g. 9.8 % vs. 2.9 % for substance use disorder), more frequent primary care visits (10.9 vs. 6.0 visits), and higher acute care utilization rates (25.8 % vs. 7.7 % for emergency department [ED] visits and 15.0 % vs. 3.9 % for hospitalization). Almost one in five (18 %) patients who were considered high-effort were not deemed complex by the same PCPs.
Patients defined as high-effort by their primary care physicians, not all of whom were medically complex, appear to have a high burden of psychosocial issues that may not be accounted for in current chronic disease-focused risk adjustment approaches.
更好地了解那些需要更多精力来管理的患者的特征,可能会改进风险调整方法,并带来更有效的资源分配、改善患者护理和健康结果,以及减少初级保健临床医生的职业倦怠。
从医生的角度识别并描述高精力投入患者。
队列研究。
一个学术性初级保健网络中的99名初级保健医生。
从其诊疗名单中随机选择的100名患者中,初级保健医生识别出需要高水平团队精力投入的患者以及他们认为复杂的患者。对于高精力投入患者,初级保健医生指出影响他们决策的因素:医疗/护理协调、行为健康和/或社会经济因素。我们根据初级保健医生定义的精力投入和复杂性检查了患者特征的差异。
在9594名符合条件的患者中,初级保健医生将2277名(23.7%)归类为高精力投入患者,2676名(27.9%)归类为复杂患者。行为健康问题是年轻患者精力投入的主要驱动因素,而医疗/护理协调问题在老年患者中占主导。与低精力投入患者相比,高精力投入患者在医疗(如糖尿病患者中23.2%对6.3%)和行为健康问题(如物质使用障碍患者中9.8%对2.9%)方面的发生率显著更高(所有P均<0.01),更频繁进行初级保健就诊(10.9次对6.0次),以及更高的急性护理利用率(急诊科就诊率25.8%对7.7%,住院率15.0%对3.9%)。几乎五分之一(18%)被认为是高精力投入的患者,同一名初级保健医生并不认为他们复杂。
被初级保健医生定义为高精力投入的患者,并非所有患者在医学上都复杂,他们似乎承受着较高的心理社会问题负担,而当前以慢性病为重点的风险调整方法可能并未考虑到这些问题。