Mass Trapping Lepidopteran Pests with Light Traps, with Focus on Tortricid Forest Pests: What If?

The management of Lepidopteran pests with light traps () is often achieved by luring adults to death at light sources (light trap-based mass trapping, or ). Large-scale programs against agricultural pests initiated in the late 1920s in the United States were phased out in the 1970s, coinciding with the rise of pheromone-based management research. The interest in has surged in recent years with the advent of light emitting diodes, solar power sources, and intelligent design. The first step in implementing is to identify a trapping design that maximizes the capture of target pests and minimizes the capture of non-target beneficial insects-with a cautionary note that high captures in are not equivalent to the feasibility of mass trapping: the ultimate objective of is to protect crop plants from pest damage, not to trap adults. The captures of egg-carrying females in light traps have a greater impact on the efficiency of than the captures of males. When is defined as a harvesting procedure, the biomass of females in may be viewed as the best estimator of the mass trapping yield; biomass proxy has universal application in as every living organism can be defined on a per weight basis. While research has largely focused on agricultural pests, an attempt is made here to conceptualize as a pest management strategy in forest ecosystems, using spruce budworm as a case study. The mass trapping of female budworms is impossible to achieve in endemic populations due to the large spatial scale of forest landscapes (implying the deployment of a prohibitively large number of LTs); in addition, ovipositing female budworms do not respond to light sources at a low density of conspecifics. The light-based mass trapping of female budworms may provide a realistic management option for geographically isolated forest stands heavily infested with budworms, as a tool to prevent tree mortality. Somehow unexpectedly, however, one factor obscuring the feasibility of is as follows: the complex ('unknowable') economic valuation of forest stands as opposed to agricultural landscapes.