• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统非手术牙髓治疗40年的疗效:基于实践的回顾性评估

40-Year Outcome of Old-School, Non-Surgical Endodontic Treatment: Practice-Based Retrospective Evaluation.

作者信息

Frankenberger Roland, Becker Stephan, Beck-Broichsitter Benedicta, Albrecht-Hass Susanne, Behrens Charlotte J, Roggendorf Matthias J, Koch Andreas

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics, and Pediatric Dentistry, Medical Center for Dentistry, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, 35392 Marburg, Germany.

Prof. Becker & Kollegen, Kehdenstrasse 2-10, 47803 Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2024 Apr 1;12(4):90. doi: 10.3390/dj12040090.

DOI:10.3390/dj12040090
PMID:38668002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11049336/
Abstract

(1) Background: Non-surgical endodontic treatment has been shown to be clinically successful; however, clinical long-term data are scarce. This practice-based retrospective clinical investigation evaluated endodontic outcomes over 40 years and identified relevant clinical co-factors. (2) Methods: Two experienced dental practitioners in two different private dental practices treated 174 patients with 245 teeth from 1969 to 1993. After root canal obturation, either a new direct restoration (amalgam, resin composite, or glass-ionomer cement) or the re-cementation of a pre-existing prosthetic restoration or renewal of prosthetic restoration followed. Metal posts (operator A) or metal screws (operator B) were inserted when coronal substance loss was significant. The primary outcome (i.e., tooth survival) was achieved when the endodontically treated tooth was, in situ, painless and had full function at the end of the observation period. A secondary outcome, the impact of different prognostic factors on survival rate, was evaluated. (3) Results: The overall mean survival was 56.1% of all treated teeth after 40 years of clinical service, resulting in an annual failure rate of 1.1%. Most investigated clinical co-factors (jaw, tooth position, intracanal dressings, post/screw placement, and gender) showed no significant influence on survival. (4) Conclusions: Even with materials and techniques from the 1970s and 1980s, successful root canal treatment was achievable. Except for post-endodontic restorations, most of the evaluated factors had no significant influence on the clinical long-term survival of root canal-treated teeth.

摘要

(1) 背景:非手术牙髓治疗已被证明在临床上是成功的;然而,临床长期数据却很匮乏。这项基于实践的回顾性临床研究评估了40年间的牙髓治疗结果,并确定了相关的临床共同因素。(2) 方法:1969年至1993年,两名经验丰富的牙科医生在两家不同的私人牙科诊所治疗了174例患者的245颗牙齿。根管充填后,要么进行新的直接修复(银汞合金、树脂复合材料或玻璃离子水门汀),要么重新粘结现有的修复体或更换修复体。当冠部牙体组织大量缺损时,操作者A插入金属桩,操作者B插入金属螺钉。当接受牙髓治疗的牙齿在观察期结束时原位无痛且功能正常时,达到主要结局(即牙齿存活)。评估了次要结局,即不同预后因素对存活率的影响。(3) 结果:经过40年的临床使用,所有治疗牙齿的总体平均存活率为56.1%,年失败率为1.1%。大多数研究的临床共同因素(颌骨、牙齿位置、根管内敷料、桩/螺钉放置和性别)对存活率没有显著影响。(4) 结论:即使采用20世纪70年代和80年代的材料和技术,也能实现成功的根管治疗。除牙髓治疗后的修复外,大多数评估因素对根管治疗牙齿的临床长期存活没有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/0792ad7c0de7/dentistry-12-00090-g017a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/82f49c5c37fc/dentistry-12-00090-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/938e4bf90a90/dentistry-12-00090-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/1b4349abf9b6/dentistry-12-00090-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/2319986950de/dentistry-12-00090-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/3b9ecf156277/dentistry-12-00090-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/169c626996ed/dentistry-12-00090-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/b34b411a0bd2/dentistry-12-00090-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/497f700900d6/dentistry-12-00090-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/d5a880bcc23d/dentistry-12-00090-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/688803040d51/dentistry-12-00090-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/26af77fcc559/dentistry-12-00090-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/c306d020c75a/dentistry-12-00090-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/8aa4466fb53a/dentistry-12-00090-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/3ac57a503278/dentistry-12-00090-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/34486c9c829f/dentistry-12-00090-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/77c28d0580ae/dentistry-12-00090-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/0792ad7c0de7/dentistry-12-00090-g017a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/82f49c5c37fc/dentistry-12-00090-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/938e4bf90a90/dentistry-12-00090-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/1b4349abf9b6/dentistry-12-00090-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/2319986950de/dentistry-12-00090-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/3b9ecf156277/dentistry-12-00090-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/169c626996ed/dentistry-12-00090-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/b34b411a0bd2/dentistry-12-00090-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/497f700900d6/dentistry-12-00090-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/d5a880bcc23d/dentistry-12-00090-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/688803040d51/dentistry-12-00090-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/26af77fcc559/dentistry-12-00090-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/c306d020c75a/dentistry-12-00090-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/8aa4466fb53a/dentistry-12-00090-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/3ac57a503278/dentistry-12-00090-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/34486c9c829f/dentistry-12-00090-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/77c28d0580ae/dentistry-12-00090-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a6/11049336/0792ad7c0de7/dentistry-12-00090-g017a.jpg

相似文献

1
40-Year Outcome of Old-School, Non-Surgical Endodontic Treatment: Practice-Based Retrospective Evaluation.传统非手术牙髓治疗40年的疗效:基于实践的回顾性评估
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Apr 1;12(4):90. doi: 10.3390/dj12040090.
2
Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study.冠修复对根管治疗的前磨牙和磨牙抗折性的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Aust Endod J. 2013 Aug;39(2):48-56. doi: 10.1111/aej.12002. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
3
Longevity of class 2 direct restorations in root-filled teeth: A retrospective clinical study.根管治疗后牙齿的二类直接修复体的存留时间:一项回顾性临床研究。
J Dent. 2015 May;43(5):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
4
The resin-matrix cement layer thickness resultant from the intracanal fitting of teeth root canal posts: an integrative review.根管内桩道预备后树脂-基质水门汀层厚度:系统综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct;25(10):5595-5612. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04070-9. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars.纤维预制桩或定制桩的放置会影响根管治疗后前磨牙的3年生存率。
Am J Dent. 2008 Jun;21(3):179-84.
6
Radiologic assessment of quality of root canal fillings and periapical status in an Austrian subpopulation - An observational study.奥地利亚人群根管充填质量及根尖周状况的放射学评估——一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 May 2;12(5):e0176724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176724. eCollection 2017.
7
The influence of coronal restoration type on the survival of endodontically treated teeth.冠修复类型对根管治疗后牙齿存留率的影响。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004 Dec;12(4):171-6.
8
Two-year clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and resin composite restorations.无髓牙美白及树脂复合材料修复的两年临床评估
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(6):369-78; discussion 379. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00472.x.
9
Retrospective Assessment of Endodontically Treated Teeth Replaced by Dental Implants.根管治疗后牙的回顾性评估。
J Endod. 2024 Mar;50(3):310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.12.002. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
10
Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review.采用粘结式纤维增强复合桩系统的根管治疗后修复:综述
Am J Dent. 2007 Dec;20(6):353-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological and mechanical challenges in the endodontic treatment of immature teeth with pulp necrosis: insights based on a Series of Atypical Clinical Cases.牙髓坏死的未成熟恒牙根管治疗中的生物学和机械挑战:基于一系列非典型临床病例的见解
Biomater Investig Dent. 2025 Apr 4;12:43427. doi: 10.2340/biid.v12.43427. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical Outcomes and Complication Rates of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study.根管治疗后牙齿行固定义齿修复的临床疗效及并发症发生率:一项回顾性研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;13(1):42. doi: 10.3390/dj13010042.
3
Endodontic emergency patients' profile and treatment outcome - a prospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Endodontic Outcome of Root Canal Treatment Using Different Obturation Techniques: A Clinical Study.使用不同充填技术进行根管治疗的牙髓治疗结果:一项临床研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;11(8):200. doi: 10.3390/dj11080200.
2
Implant or tooth? - A cost-time analysis of managing "unrestorable" teeth.种植体还是牙齿?——“无法修复”牙齿处理的成本-时间分析。
J Dent. 2023 Sep;136:104646. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104646. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
3
Factors Affecting the Decision-making of Direct Pulp Capping Procedures among Dental Practitioners: A Multinational Survey from 16 Countries with Meta-analysis.
牙髓急症患者的概况及治疗结果——一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 26;24(1):1557. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05338-8.
影响口腔医师行直接盖髓术决策的因素:来自 16 个国家的多国调查与荟萃分析。
J Endod. 2023 Jun;49(6):675-685. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.04.005. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
4
Treatment outcome of surgical and non-surgical endodontic retreatment of teeth with apical periodontitis.根尖周炎患牙手术和非手术根管再治疗的治疗效果。
Int Endod J. 2023 Jun;56(6):686-696. doi: 10.1111/iej.13914. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
What ultimately matters in root canal treatment success and tooth preservation: A 25-year cohort study.根管治疗成功和保留牙齿的关键因素:一项 25 年的队列研究。
Int Endod J. 2023 May;56(5):544-557. doi: 10.1111/iej.13895. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
Two-Year Healing Success Rates after Endodontic Treatment Using 3D Cleaning Technique: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.使用3D清洁技术进行根管治疗后的两年愈合成功率:一项前瞻性多中心临床研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 21;11(20):6213. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206213.
7
Present status and future directions: The restoration of root filled teeth.现状与未来方向:根管治疗后的牙齿修复。
Int Endod J. 2022 Oct;55 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1059-1084. doi: 10.1111/iej.13796. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Non-Surgical Endodontic Treatment Using Calcium Silicate-Based Versus Resin-Based Sealers-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.基于硅酸钙与树脂的封闭剂用于非手术牙髓治疗的临床和影像学结果——临床研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Apr 7;13(2):38. doi: 10.3390/jfb13020038.
9
European Society of Endodontology position statement: The restoration of root filled teeth.欧洲牙髓病学会立场声明:根管治疗后的牙齿修复。
Int Endod J. 2021 Nov;54(11):1974-1981. doi: 10.1111/iej.13607. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
When to intervene in the caries process? A Delphi consensus statement.何时干预龋齿进程?德尔菲共识声明。
Br Dent J. 2020 Oct;229(7):474-482. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2220-4.