Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Int Endod J. 2023 Jun;56(6):686-696. doi: 10.1111/iej.13914. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
To evaluate and compare the treatment outcome of root filled teeth with apical periodontitis treated either non-surgically or by endodontic microsurgery, and to assess the influence of an intra-radicular post, clinical and demographic factors.
Clinical and radiological data from 1157 patients with apical periodontitis in previously root filled teeth treated by postgraduate students at the Department of Endodontics, University of Oslo, between September 2010 and January 2020 with recall data at least 11 months from completion were studied. Surgical cases were scored using the Rud/Molven criteria and grouped into success, uncertain or failure at control. Non-surgical cases were scored with the periapical index (PAI) and similarly grouped into success, uncertain or failure at control. Chi-square analyses were used for comparison of subgroups of teeth treated and logistic regression analyses for assessment of the influence of clinical variables.
Non-surgical retreatment was performed on 351 teeth and 107 teeth were treated with endodontic microsurgery, with overall success rates of 65.5% and 77.6%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant. Teeth with an intra-radicular post treated non-surgically (n = 30) were successful in 73.3% of cases, whereas teeth with intra-radicular post treated with endodontic microsurgery (n = 30) had a lower, 66.7% success rate. The distribution of tooth groups (anterior, premolar and molar) differed significantly between surgical and non-surgical cases, with maxillary anterior and premolar teeth more often treated surgically. Non-surgical retreatment cases were significantly influenced by patients' age (older patients had poorer outcome) and pre-operative PAI score (negatively correlated with outcome). Surgical cases were not significantly influenced by the factors studied here.
The tooth type differed significantly for teeth treated by surgical versus non-surgical methods. Microsurgical treatment with apicectomy and retrograde filling showed significantly better treatment results than non-surgical retreatment of teeth with apical periodontitis, whereas treatment outcome in teeth with posts after non-surgical treatment tended to be better than after surgical treatment. Outcome of non-surgical retreatment was negatively influenced by older age and higher pre-operative PAI score.
评估和比较根尖周炎经非手术或根管显微外科治疗的根管治疗后牙齿的治疗效果,并评估根管内桩、临床和人口统计学因素的影响。
研究了 2010 年 9 月至 2020 年 1 月期间,在奥斯陆大学牙髓病学系接受研究生治疗的根尖周炎的 1157 名患者的临床和放射学数据,这些患者的患牙曾接受过根管治疗,且在完成治疗后至少 11 个月有随访数据。手术病例采用 Rud/Molven 标准评分,并分为成功、不确定或控制失败。非手术病例采用根尖指数(PAI)评分,并同样分为成功、不确定或控制失败。采用卡方检验比较治疗牙齿的亚组,采用逻辑回归分析评估临床变量的影响。
351 颗牙行非手术再治疗,107 颗牙行根管显微外科治疗,总体成功率分别为 65.5%和 77.6%,差异有统计学意义。有根管内桩的牙行非手术治疗(n=30)成功率为 73.3%,而有根管内桩的牙行根管显微外科治疗(n=30)成功率较低,为 66.7%。手术和非手术病例的牙组(前牙、前磨牙和磨牙)分布差异有统计学意义,上颌前牙和前磨牙更常行手术治疗。非手术再治疗病例的年龄(年龄较大的患者治疗效果较差)和术前 PAI 评分(与治疗效果呈负相关)对治疗结果有显著影响。手术病例不受所研究因素的显著影响。
手术和非手术治疗的牙类型差异显著。根尖切除术和逆行充填的显微外科治疗与根尖周炎非手术再治疗相比,显示出显著更好的治疗效果,而根管内桩的牙经非手术治疗后的治疗效果比手术治疗后的效果好。非手术再治疗的结果受年龄较大和术前 PAI 评分较高的负面影响。